HFU HF Underground

General Category => General Radio Discussion => Topic started by: ChrisSmolinski on November 22, 2019, 1944 UTC

Title: Congress Introduces AM-FM Act to Revise Copyright Law for Terrestrial Radio
Post by: ChrisSmolinski on November 22, 2019, 1944 UTC
No word if this would apply to shortwave pirate radio stations  :)

Quote
Senator Marsha Blackburn and Rep. Jerrold Nadler today introduced the Ask Musicians for Music Act (AM-FM), which aims to revise existing copyright law for radio stations and musicians.

Under the current copyright system, radio stations can use sound recordings over their airwaves without paying royalties to creators who own a stake in the sound recordings. The AM-FM Act would require all radio services to pay fair-market value for the music they use.

https://variety.com/2019/biz/news/congress-am-fm-act-copyright-law-terrestrial-radio-1203412412/
Title: Re: Congress Introduces AM-FM Act to Revise Copyright Law for Terrestrial Radio
Post by: BoomboxDX on November 26, 2019, 0409 UTC
If passed, more commercials, talk and religion (and other brokered radio) coming to the airwaves near you.
Title: Re: Congress Introduces AM-FM Act to Revise Copyright Law for Terrestrial Radio
Post by: Brian on November 26, 2019, 1056 UTC
I'm astonished that stations don't that already.
They do here.  The amount is calculated on the stations turnover, I think. The bigger the station, the more they pay.
Even ordinary businesses that have a radio on in their office/shop have to pay as it's considered a public performance.
That way,the musician gets payed  multiple times.

Way back in the 1980's. one of the big pirates here offered to pay performance rights in an attempt to appear legal but it was refused.
Title: Re: Congress Introduces AM-FM Act to Revise Copyright Law for Terrestrial Radio
Post by: Josh on November 26, 2019, 2336 UTC
"the musician gets payed "

lol
Title: Re: Congress Introduces AM-FM Act to Revise Copyright Law for Terrestrial Radio
Post by: BoomboxDX on November 29, 2019, 1022 UTC
I'm astonished that stations don't that already.
They do here.  The amount is calculated on the stations turnover, I think. The bigger the station, the more they pay.
Even ordinary businesses that have a radio on in their office/shop have to pay as it's considered a public performance.
That way,the musician gets payed  multiple times.

Way back in the 1980's. one of the big pirates here offered to pay performance rights in an attempt to appear legal but it was refused.

Stations pay BMI, ASCAP, etc., but this proposed law is a different deal. This would require stations to pay considerably more money per play than they pay now -- which, from what little I understand, is a lot less than digital royalties are.