HFU HF Underground

General Category => Huh? => Topic started by: JCMaxwell on May 16, 2017, 1358 UTC

Title: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: JCMaxwell on May 16, 2017, 1358 UTC
Anyone keeping up with Killary's body count?  I've lost track.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/16/slain-dnc-staffer-had-contact-with-wikileaks-investigator-says.html (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/05/16/slain-dnc-staffer-had-contact-with-wikileaks-investigator-says.html)

Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: MDK2 on May 16, 2017, 1439 UTC
Um... zero, right?

I think when we have a president giving away top secret information to the Russians and endangering our agents in the field, we can finally stop talking about Hillary. Just my opinion.

Now, back to shortwave pirates. Please.
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: JCMaxwell on May 16, 2017, 1449 UTC
Umm..  nope

So we'll have to agree to disagree, but since when is this sub-forum closed to politics? 

If that is the case, there are plenty of posts by other members that need to be corrected.
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: MDK2 on May 16, 2017, 1518 UTC
Nothing is "closed" but politics are divisive and IMHO have no place in non-political forums. We're here because we're united in our love of shortwave. My vote is to keep it that way, but you are free to do as the admins allow.
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Unknown Name on May 16, 2017, 1530 UTC
I agree, this has nothing to do with radio, so why post it?
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Josh on May 16, 2017, 1542 UTC
Shush, do you wanna get Ron Browned/Vince Fostered?!?



Also, I'm sure this murder was a random robbery save for nothing was missing from the body.
https://i.redd.it/oqpr78732txy.jpg
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: JCMaxwell on May 16, 2017, 1901 UTC
"Now, back to shortwave pirates. Please."

"Nothing is "closed" but politics are divisive and IMHO have no place in non-political forums.
We're here because we're united in our love of shortwave.
My vote is to keep it that way, but you are free to do as the admins allow."

"I agree, this has nothing to do with radio, so why post it?"


As far as our differing political / social views, like the song says -

"...I'll believe what I believe
And you believe what you believe too..."

And that's cool with me.


What chaps my hide is when a double-standard is applied.
I was stating my beliefs / observations, as many others have in this
forum on political views.  If you're going to call me out on it, that's fine,
as long as everyone who does it is called out too.

I haven't seen that happen before on this forum and it surprised me.

That's my only point.

Anyway, sorry I ruffled so many feathers.

It's been real.

JC
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Josh on May 16, 2017, 2130 UTC
Hey bro, don't leave me here with all these killary supporters.
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Pigmeat on May 17, 2017, 0249 UTC
Al, your kids are acting up!

Since Trump turned the black helicopters over to Al, he's nowhere to be found, but when he gets back.......

Do you boys use just foil like Pop's or have you included mylar to reflect the heat of the Sun? That heat build up is why he has to guzzle anti-freeze. Otherwise you get brain bubbles. Unlike what most people tell you, drinking antifreeze wont kill you if you follow the basic rule, shots only until you're partially blind. Top up weekly.

BTW, the Presidential rug is mylar lined. I don't know about his little red caps. Fez's would've been a better look. Imagine Trump coming down the street in a mini-car and a fez. That's a look that inspires.
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Josh on May 17, 2017, 1657 UTC
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C_9ijWXUAAAnbwq.jpg:large

If he was conscious when the officers got to him, and some were wearing cameras, I wonder what Mr Rich said to them?
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Pigmeat on May 17, 2017, 1832 UTC
"Ann Coulter is a ma...."
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Uncle John on May 18, 2017, 0028 UTC
Umm..  nope. So we'll have to agree to disagree, but since when is this sub-forum closed to politics?  If that is the case, there are plenty of posts by other members that need to be corrected.

              http://avani-yoga.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/The-Autobiography-of-a-Spiritual-Genius-Gopi-Krishna.pdf (http://avani-yoga.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/The-Autobiography-of-a-Spiritual-Genius-Gopi-Krishna.pdf)
             
                                                                           >:(   Particularly begin w. "Part 5".    >:(
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Pigmeat on May 18, 2017, 0259 UTC
Umm..  nope. So we'll have to agree to disagree, but since when is this sub-forum closed to politics?  If that is the case, there are plenty of posts by other members that need to be corrected.

              http://avani-yoga.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/The-Autobiography-of-a-Spiritual-Genius-Gopi-Krishna.pdf (http://avani-yoga.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/The-Autobiography-of-a-Spiritual-Genius-Gopi-Krishna.pdf)
             
                                                                           >:(   Particularly begin w. "Part 5".    >:(

It's not a fez, but it is a snazzy cap. Do you think he was a foil man?
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Uncle John on May 18, 2017, 2147 UTC
It's not a fez, but it is a snazzy cap. Do you think he was a foil man?

                  No, but I have decided you are a waste of my time. So Long.
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Pigmeat on May 18, 2017, 2216 UTC
Ask a question about a god-man's preferred cap lining, and people get upset. Sheesh!

Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Dr. Strangelove on May 18, 2017, 2326 UTC
Umm..  nope. So we'll have to agree to disagree, but since when is this sub-forum closed to politics?  If that is the case, there are plenty of posts by other members that need to be corrected.

              http://avani-yoga.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/The-Autobiography-of-a-Spiritual-Genius-Gopi-Krishna.pdf (http://avani-yoga.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/The-Autobiography-of-a-Spiritual-Genius-Gopi-Krishna.pdf)
             
                                                                           >:(   Particularly begin w. "Part 5".    >:(
Quit taking the brown acid!
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: John Poet on May 21, 2017, 0932 UTC
Anyone keeping up with Killary's body count?  I've lost track.


She'd have a long way to go to catch up with Republican George W. Bush's hundreds of thousands,
or Nixon and Kissinger's millions...  (there's an "inconvenient truth" for ya!)

BTW-- Since Faux News won a court ruling which stated that nothing they broadcast has to actually be true, they aren't really a credible source for anything whatsoever...

Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Josh on May 21, 2017, 1336 UTC
http://www.wnd.com/2017/05/chilling-similarities-between-seth-rich-murder-and-clinton-body-count-victims/

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.php#axzz4hiiWEfZ5

lol who knew
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth" And counting!
Post by: ThaDood on May 21, 2017, 1406 UTC
   Yep,  that's the problem with Billery and Hill. Ya get too close to them and find out stuff, there leads a trail of a body count. Might be time to bring back out the blast from the past the Vince Foster Suicide Action Figure Doll. And, didn't anyone learn anything from the movie Primary Colors? Oh wait... That was fiction. Right????
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Skipmuck on May 21, 2017, 1536 UTC
I was not planning on getting embroiled in this particular discussion, but I woke up with a headache this morning.....despite having quit drinking over 13 years ago....then again, maybe I won't comment after all...follow the links and judge for yourself. :-X

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/bodycount.asp
https://www.thoughtco.com/the-clinton-body-count-4056792
https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4525
https://www.truthorfiction.com/clintonfriends/
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Josh on May 21, 2017, 1742 UTC
According to the Daily Mail, David has remarried since his divorce from Barbara in 2014. His current wife, Elyssa Young, works as an administrative worker at Snopes, but she previously had a lengthy career as an escort and adult film star working under the name Erin O’Bryn. Reviews for Young’s “services” have been left on her personal escort website as recently as 2015. Young’s websites and Twitter account describe her as “a mature and experienced courtesan, idealist, activist & dreamer.” Her website further states, “Here’s the donation I request for my time, companionship, and entertainment” with “non-negotiable” rates of $1,200 for her minimum four hours and $5,000 for 24 hours.
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/12/22/snopes-ceo-accused-in-divorce-proceedings-of-embezzling-company-money-to-spend-on-prostitutes/


lol seriously you can trust snopes
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Skipmuck on May 21, 2017, 1843 UTC
According to the Daily Mail, David has remarried since his divorce from Barbara in 2014. His current wife, Elyssa Young, works as an administrative worker at Snopes, but she previously had a lengthy career as an escort and adult film star working under the name Erin O’Bryn. Reviews for Young’s “services” have been left on her personal escort website as recently as 2015. Young’s websites and Twitter account describe her as “a mature and experienced courtesan, idealist, activist & dreamer.” Her website further states, “Here’s the donation I request for my time, companionship, and entertainment” with “non-negotiable” rates of $1,200 for her minimum four hours and $5,000 for 24 hours.
http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2016/12/22/snopes-ceo-accused-in-divorce-proceedings-of-embezzling-company-money-to-spend-on-prostitutes/


lol seriously you can trust snopes

http://variety.com/2017/biz/news/milo-yiannopoulos-resigns-breitbart-pedophilia-1201993063/

lol seriously you can trust breitbart

But  don't let that stop you....follow the links...
http://www.alternet.org/election-2016/6-manufactured-news-scandals-produced-and-promoted-breitbart-news-and-new-trump
https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2016/08/17/breitbart-news-worst-headlines/212467
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/dispatches/2017/01/09/anatomy-breitbart-lie/
https://www.thenation.com/article/from-fox-news-to-breitbart-liars-harassers-and-far-right-bottom-feeders/
http://www.salon.com/2017/02/06/building-the-realm-of-alternative-facts-trumps-lies-are-enabled-by-years-of-right-wing-media/
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/fbi-breitbart-investigate-alt-right-wing-websites-fake-news-bots-donald-trump-a7641826.html
http://therightscoop.com/jake-tapper-mocks-breitbart-news-for-being-bannons-lapdog/
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: MDK2 on May 21, 2017, 1902 UTC
Josh, do you think that someone who unironically shares WND posts can actually say that anyone else's sources are untrustworthy?

The funny thing about the ad hominem against Snopes is that it doesn't actually discredit them. One can be a whoremonger AND able to conduct thorough and fair research. The two aren't in any way exclusive. (And no, I don't believe the Daily Mail's uncorroborated story, I'm just pointing out that it doesn't matter if it's true.)
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: MDK2 on May 21, 2017, 1908 UTC
Anyway, this is why it's never a good idea to bring up politics in a nonpolitical forum. The internet has millions of places for such spleen venting. (I know, I like to vent mine from time to time.) There's no reason to ever mention it here, except when something has some direct bearing on our hobby. We have other places we can go.
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Pigmeat on May 22, 2017, 1155 UTC
Good! Back to hat liners. Has anyone tried cutting down survival blankets to fit? You could do several caps and hats with one blanket.
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Traveling Wave on May 22, 2017, 1630 UTC
In the immortal words of Hunter S. Thompson ....."When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro"
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Josh on May 22, 2017, 1728 UTC
"Josh, do you think that someone who unironically shares WND posts can actually say that anyone else's sources are untrustworthy?"
Absolutely.

"The funny thing about the ad hominem against Snopes is that it doesn't actually discredit them. One can be a whoremonger AND able to conduct thorough and fair research. The two aren't in any way exclusive. (And no, I don't believe the Daily Mail's uncorroborated story, I'm just pointing out that it doesn't matter if it's true.)"
Just one ensample of the vast left wing spiracy of fake news, you know those "news" outlets that predicted a killary win by a landslide, and that honesty or personal integrity matter not to leftists.
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Josh on May 22, 2017, 1731 UTC
Anyway, this is why it's never a good idea to bring up politics in a nonpolitical forum. The internet has millions of places for such spleen venting. (I know, I like to vent mine from time to time.) There's no reason to ever mention it here, except when something has some direct bearing on our hobby. We have other places we can go.

A fascist always wants to control what people can talk about.

jussayin
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Pigmeat on May 23, 2017, 0111 UTC
I bet Franco was a foil man.
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: ChrisSmolinski on May 23, 2017, 1218 UTC
Franco.

(http://i.imgur.com/n99E0HJ.jpg)
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Skipmuck on May 23, 2017, 2341 UTC
https://www.aol.com/article/entertainment/2017/05/23/fox-news-retracts-seth-rich-story/22105997/


Uh-Oh Spaghetti O's! Yum!  :D
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Josh on May 24, 2017, 1653 UTC
https://twitter.com/YoungDems4Trump/status/866568927844851712
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: BoomboxDX on May 25, 2017, 1453 UTC
As an independent I didn't particularly care for either major Presidential candidate but we got the one we got and hopefully, in some way, the country comes out better for it, even if it's despite him being in office -- for whatever that's worth.

As for what you can believe, really, it's up to an individual to mistrust any news source and just do research if you want to know the truth, or something close to it... they're all in it to make money, and stories sell when they're exciting and pointed...

They don't print news or broadcast news for the good of the people. It's to make a living, and try to survive in an internet news environment, where the New York Times is competing with Joe Blow's Biased News Blog; it's an environment where any mannequin can put up a web site and claim to be a journalist.

Sorry for my cynicism, just overloaded from all the political blather on my FB lately. Peace.

Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Josh on May 25, 2017, 1603 UTC
Those paragons of human dignity and freedom, the saudis, recently complained that their media was letting the public define or drive the narrative instead of the media defining the narrative, wich every regime desires.
Anyway I think we all know what the others think and no one is going to be changing anyones mind on the matter so yeah.
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: redhat on May 27, 2017, 2353 UTC
If there is one thing I have observed with Trump in office is how closed DC is to outsiders and their ideas.  Having observed this, it makes me wonder if change, short of a revolution and its bloodshed, is really possible.

It does paint a fairly bleak picture of a country controlled by a runaway government that seeks only to masturbate itself.  Time will tell...

+-RH
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Pigmeat on May 28, 2017, 1343 UTC
Redhat, as I told a revolutionary type I knew decades ago; do you know what a revolution in a superpower such as the United States would entail? We're not talking about simply civilians taking up arms, but factions of the military with it's arsenals being unleashed in a total war driven by competing ideologies. That means nukes, chemical, and biological weapons very likely being used wholesale within our own borders. There wouldn't be a blade of grass worth eating after such a conflict and it would take decades, if not centuries for anything resembling functioning society to reemerge.

If you want to change the system, you have to participate in the system, you can't stand on the sidelines, observe, and complain or simply walk away. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, but radical, sudden change is always a violent and murderous affair that does no one any good.
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: skeezix on May 28, 2017, 1616 UTC
If you want to change the system, you have to participate in the system, you can't stand on the sidelines, observe, and complain or simply walk away.

Yuri Bezmenov: Deception Was My Job (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3qkf3bajd4)
Title: Re: A real "Inconvenient Truth"
Post by: Josh on May 28, 2017, 1621 UTC
Redhat, as I told a revolutionary type I knew decades ago; do you know what a revolution in a superpower such as the United States would entail? We're not talking about simply civilians taking up arms, but factions of the military with it's arsenals being unleashed in a total war driven by competing ideologies. That means nukes, chemical, and biological weapons very likely being used wholesale within our own borders. There wouldn't be a blade of grass worth eating after such a conflict and it would take decades, if not centuries for anything resembling functioning society to reemerge.

If you want to change the system, you have to participate in the system, you can't stand on the sidelines, observe, and complain or simply walk away. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, but radical, sudden change is always a violent and murderous affair that does no one any good.

There's also the outside influences to such activities. Don't think Russia or China or even Canada and countries in south America would sit idle as we tear ourselves apart. That being said, a great great uncle, who happened to be the only president of the Confederacy, said if there's to ever be another civil war, let them start it.