HFU HF Underground

Technical Topics => The RF Workbench => Topic started by: Zazzle on September 27, 2013, 1222 UTC

Title: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (OFF air, 10.237,5kHz, 5W)
Post by: Zazzle on September 27, 2013, 1222 UTC
Hi everyone,

Firts of all: I'm not a native speaker of the english tongue. Please bear with me in case I screw up the grammar every now and then.

I toy with RF stuff since my childhood. (I have a passion for RF stuff on shortwave since I was eight. Back then my grand mother gave me her old valve radio as a birthday present and after I hit the SW button one day in the evening I could not let go. For me, SW is the modern way of the 'travel bug'). I've build quite some stuff so far and operate a small "wide range radio thermometer grid" in my area (µC controlled, solar powered, 1W 70cm transmitters. The farest one is 8km).

Now I want to build a CW beacon. Why? First, there is this a certain curiosity on the technical side: tinkering and the question if someone will pick it up, ever. Then there's this romantic side. A CW beacon is some kind of light house in a dark, stormy night. It's there when no one's around, sending it message to whoever may hear it.

So, enough smalltalk. Lets start with some technical stuff :)

1) The concept:
The whole beacon will be solar powered (by a 20-40W PV panel - overdone for the summertime but will also offer enough charge during winter) and controlled by an AVR controller. It will charge during day and as soon as the sun has set it'll start transmitting a message. The mikrocontroller will monitor the battery and shut down the device to keep itself in operation with 20% of battery capacity remaining as a buffer. The Battery, charge controller, mikrocontroller and transmitter will be mounted inside a water proof box. It's a low budget project because I guess sooner or later someone will find and steal/disassemble or damage it. The problem is that I live in a rather large city near its limits and so far I couldn't find a proper place that would allow to mount such a transmitter high above the ground without being noticed. Therefore I have to make a tradeoff between performance and security.

Picture (http://imageshack.us/a/img826/4580/9b6d.jpg)

2) Location
The main problem is the place where I live. It's a big city. There are no hills around. But there's lot of destructive people that like to damage stuff and there's a lot of background noise. The surrounding land is more or less flat (and used for agiculture purposes). My focus is on three primary locations:

A) Old Airfield

Picture (http://imageshack.us/a/img24/5272/ifzp.jpg)

It's possible to mount the module close to the ground so it won't be visible from some distance. There's an old fence with massive wooden post running across the field. I could mount long wooden slants to them, holding the transmitter an Antenna.

PRO
- No buildings around
- Wide open space
- If installed clever, not visible from the distance
CONS
- The Antenna will only be 2-3m above the ground
- Easy to reach / disassemble / damage

B) Old bridge

Picture (http://imageshack.us/a/img842/9238/bcs1.jpg)

I could install the PV module and transmitter easily in the middle of the bridge and run the antenna wires left and right towards surrounding trees.

PROS
- Transmitter and module easy to hide
- Not easy to reach
CONS
- The construction is made of steel
- The top of the bride is just 3-4m above the ground since its socket is below the ground level.

C) Old depot house roof

Picture (http://imageshack.us/a/img191/3761/lqkp.jpg)

Except of the (thin) antenna wires the whole setup is easy to hide. Climbing into the roof is hard and requires acrobatic stills. Therefore the setup is not prone to be stolen or suffering from damage.

PROS
- Not easy to access
- Antenan wires will be 10-12m above the ground
CONS
- Still in the city, higer building on one side, an open air field on the other side
- The roof construction is made of steel

3) The frequency.
I'm completely not sure about the frequency I want to use. My circuit is cabable of tuning about -/-20kHz around the fundamental crystal ferquency. I have crystals for:

10.00000 MHz
13.25583 MHz
16.48555 MHz

For me it's important to not disturb the HAM bands or any other service like nautic communication and alike. But of course I want my beacon to be noticed. Therefore I'm looking for a frequency that's not prne to cause trouble but is still likely to be scanned frequently.

My favorite is the 10MHz one. Because it's close to the 30m CW band.

4) The Signal.
This is primary about battery lifetime. Like told before, the whole device runs on Solar power and I also want it to operate during winter, even if not all night long. I have to make a decision between the TX-Time (the more often the more possible the beacon will be noticed) and battery lifetime (there is no use in having the transmitter shut down after just one hour of operation).

At the moment the Concept looks like this:

- Every 10 seconds a 1s long dash (to get attention)
- Each 10 Minutes the following message will be transmitted:

"<LOCATOR> SOLAR NIGHT ONLY UBAT 125" (where UBAT 125 means BATTERY VOLTAGE = 12,5V.)

5) Antenna
I think I go for a classic wire dipole. It will be quite long (23 ft. 4.8 inches / 7.1 mtr. per element) but on the other hand it's easy to build and mount. The box holding the transmitter will be mounted in it's middle. Anything I should pay attention to?

6) Operation times
Given that the signal travels way more far during night I forsee from running the transmitter during day. What's your opinion on that?

7) RF-Power.
Currently the Transmitter delivers 1,6W into Z=50R. Is that too much? Since it's CW I guess it's quite a lot. On the other hand, I have some background noises to overcome, the antenna isn't mounted very high and I still want to bridge some distance.

Yours,
~Zazzle
Title: Re: 1,5 CW beacon project - Concept questions
Post by: ff on September 29, 2013, 2314 UTC
Nice project Zazzle!  I have read your post several times and still have yet to digest it all.  I agree with you about using the 10 MHz range.  Since your unit will be in charging mode all day, you should stick with lower bands for more reliable nighttime operation, when you will actually be transmitting.  It is imperative to keep clear of ham bands and anywhere that is being used.  If it were me, I would start monitoring several different frequencies, looking for a little used place.  Cheap crystals can be found on most electronics websites.  Most of these are defunct microprocessor clock freqs; many of these would work well for you.
I think your power level is fine - IF your location is at least a hundred meters or so from where someone would be using phones or radios or TVs.  In that situation, anything up to 5 watts seems OK to me.  Regarding that, my choice would be the old depot, IF you don't hurt yourself getting an antenna up there.  I have many people around me that like to destroy things too, but the same people tend to be lazy enough that they won't mess with something that takes a lot of effort to get to.  Have fun and good luck with your project Zazzle!
Title: Re: 1,5 CW beacon project - Concept questions
Post by: Zazzle on October 02, 2013, 1041 UTC
Hi there, ff!

First of all: thank you for the answer: I was already fearing to go without one :)

Heh, yes. That, it was quite a bunch of text, and there's more stuff I keep pondering in my head. But pondering leads to nothing, doing stuff does. So here we go. This weekend the Transmitter will, if nothing goes wrong, on air.

I'd  settle on 9.995Mhz. Around here it wasn't in use each time I checked in the evening hours every now and then. Tomorrow I'll spend my day adjusting the oscillator and power stage for the best performance. Friday is assembling day and on Saturday late evening the baby is set free. When it comes to the climbing... luckily I'm quite acrobatic and may also use a climbing harness. Man, I'm so exited. I hope no one will damage or steal it. :)

I also had some more thoughts about the signal. So far I wanted to send dashes each 10 seconds to get attention. Each 10 Minutes I wanted to transmit the message. But that's stupid. Who's listening to boring dashed for, like, more then 5 minutes? Instead, I decided to do it different.. I send the message all teh time but slow. It has some advantages. Firts, possible audience will know pretty fast that it's a message and will listen to it until the point it starts to repeat. Second, I can send the message more slow, making it easier to read when with a bad SNR. I got to have a close eye on the available charging capacities during dark winter days.

Maybe I won't stick to "space is three times the time of a 'dat'". Hell, since the message is simple I guess everyone can tell the words apart.

Anyway, I got a 12V/7,2Ah battery. It offers enough buffer for really bad days when, for example, it snows a lot. For those interested, here's the way I calculated my signal timing in regard to the energy consumption.


MESSAGE =
XXXXX SOLAR POWERED NIGHT TX ONLY 1WTX UBAT 125
     

TX active time (per message)
----------------------------------
. = 61 (* 1s) =~ 61s
- = 63 (* 3s) =~ 189s
==================================
TX(on) = 250s
==================================


Message duration
----------------------------------
+Sign AND letter spaces (5s each) = 124 (* 5s) = 620s
+ TX(on) = 250s
==================================
Duration = 870s
==================================


Message per hour
----------------------------------
3600s / 870s =~ 4,20
==================================
Messages / h = 4,20
==================================


mAh / h consumption
----------------------------------
(100% / 3600s) * 250s * 4,20 = ~ 30%/h
(240mA/100%) * 30% =  72mAh

+ 16h (winter) * 72mAh = 1152mAh
+ 24h * 5mA (system) = 120mAh
==================================
(Winterday) = 1272mAh
==================================


Worst charge condition
(The case of a snow covered module is ignored)
----------------------------------
Sun radiation in winter = 50w/m2
= 5% from Summer (1000w/m2)

5% from 80W = 4W
I(charge) = 4W/17V = 235mA
Charge hours per winter day = 5
5h * 235mA = 1175mAh
==================================
Charge per winter day = 1175mAh
==================================




Title: Re: 1,5 CW beacon project - Concept questions
Post by: ff on October 02, 2013, 1202 UTC
I love your attention to detail, Zazzle!  I have never had much luck figuring things so closely - Mother Nature always shows me my folly of thinking I can figure everything out to the decimal point.  One thing I urge you to do: you said in your first post you can bend your crystal freq +/- 20 KHz.  I would bend as far LOWER of 10 MHz as I could get it.  If you can get down to 9980, that's great.  If not, get as far from 10MHz as you can.  There's several time standard stations around the world operating on 10 MHz and you want to get out from under their interference.  For my thinking, 9995 is just too close.  I think you could find several cheap crystals in the 9-10MHz range that might be an even better way to go.

I think its wise that you are going to run a continuous message/ID.  Leaving spaces will lessen your chances of others hearing you.  Also, beaconeers that I am familiar with here use slower code.  As you say, it improves readability, and at your power level, your signal will be a challenge to copy under most conditions.

Are you using a PWM charge controller or a reflexive (switches on and off at preset battery voltage levels) unit?  Why I ask is because although PWM is more expensive, they tend to better use the available hours of sunlight, leading to a better charge.  From your calcs it looks like you are keeping the charge/discharge rates well below C20, which is good.  Also, you might want to consider a time out feature that would cut off your beacon after 6 hours of on time.  That would be helpful, especially in the winter sun months.

Finally, may God bless you on your planned climb.  I was still climbing tall trees in my early 40s but now that I'm almost 60, I realize I was running on stupidity and dumb luck.  Climbing is for kids... please be careful Zazzle!  We radio nuts need to watch out for each other.  Good luck with your project... 73!
Title: Re: 1,5 CW beacon project - Concept questions
Post by: Zazzle on October 02, 2013, 1317 UTC
Hi there!

Quote
I love your attention to detail, Zazzle!  I have never had much luck figuring things so closely - Mother Nature always shows me my folly of thinking I can figure everything out to the decimal point.  One thing I urge you to do: you said in your first post you can bend your crystal freq +/- 20 KHz.  I would bend as far LOWER of 10 MHz as I could get it.  If you can get down to 9980, that's great.  If not, get as far from 10MHz as you can.  There's several time standard stations around the world operating on 10 MHz and you want to get out from under their interference.  For my thinking, 9995 is just too close.  I think you could find several cheap crystals in the 9-10MHz range that might be an even better way to go.

I'm a perfectionist. Sometimes it's a bless (like in my old job as an engineer) but sometimes it's also a pain because I can't stop thinking (what causes problems when it's about overthinking social stuff). Heh!

Understood. But it makes me a wee bit unhappy because I'd need to re-calculate most parts and I also need to re-wind inductors. AFAIK there are some odd 7.xxx MHz crystals in my xtal box. Or I use some 3...4MHz one along with a frequency doubler. I'll check that. But yes, if nothing works I'll try to tune it away from 10M as far as I can. I just checked frequency charts. 10MHz seems to only go for the US and not Europe. But anyway, interfering with government services is a NoGo.

Edit: "Crystal penning" is going to be my friend :)

Quote
Are you using a PWM charge controller or a reflexive (switches on and off at preset battery voltage levels) unit?  Why I ask is because although PWM is more expensive, they tend to better use the available hours of sunlight, leading to a better charge.  From your calcs it looks like you are keeping the charge/discharge rates well below C20, which is good.  Also, you might want to consider a time out feature that would cut off your beacon after 6 hours of on time.  That would be helpful, especially in the winter sun months.

Naa, as simple as possible. I think I have a cheap reflexive charger somehere on the attick (just the board, without chassis). If I can't find it I'll go with the charger circuit attached (just scribbled it down, should work fine). Of course PWM would be the best solution when aiming for the best efficiency. On the other hand, the project should be as cheap as possible (since it's prone to get lost). I decided to kill the energy problem with a 80W module (got a verrrryy cheap one from ebay, one cell has a hot spot. I short circuit that one. The remaining 35 cells should work fine). A PWM charger is about 80+ bucks over here. Too much for the project. The panel was less then 15 bucks, shipping included.

C20 goes only for discharging. Lets say the battery is really drained during a winter day and the next day will be sunny, then it charges with like 3-4A. That's okay since I'm okay with, like, 1Ah missing to full charge due to the fast charging of the first 90%. In case I use my own circuit it won't cut off the charging but goes into "CU (constant voltage) charging mode", what allows the battery to keep charging at a lower current.

About the cut of: I go with a different solution: The µC will monitor the battery voltage and if it drops below 11,5V it'll not start another transmission after tehe running has finished. When the battery is back to 12,5V it starts transmitting again. The battery will wear of when staying not fully charged for a longer time but I'm aiming for broadcast-time, not a as-long-as-possible battery life. I can change the battery once a year if needed. The battery I use isn't a new one anyway.

So far I'll try to keep the costs as low as possible. It will keep me from cursing if the project gets's lost... much. Most time I'd spend on the software and circuit. And that I've on my PC so a second transmitter can be build way faster.

Quote
Finally, may God bless you on your planned climb.  I was still climbing tall trees in my early 40s but now that I'm almost 60, I realize I was running on stupidity and dumb luck.  Climbing is for kids... please be careful Zazzle!  We radio nuts need to watch out for each other.  Good luck with your project... 73!

Friends say I have that special grin on my face that tells people I'm up to no good. But well, since I still have one year until I hit the 30 (and start to get officiall old)... lets do this! :)

Yours,
~Zazzle
Title: Re: 1,5 CW beacon project - Concept questions
Post by: ff on October 02, 2013, 1915 UTC
It all sounds really good Zazzle!  Please keep us posted on your progress and final frequency choice.  Many here will want to put your beacon freq on their check list.  And since you're 29, you really ARE a kid, at least for a little while longer.  Still, be careful!  You don't want to scare this old man, do you?  :o  Good luck to you and your project...
Title: Re: 1,5 CW beacon project - Concept questions
Post by: Zazzle on June 26, 2014, 0853 UTC
Hey,

I'm not dead! Nor is the Project. :)
 I just got the hell busy with RL stuff and that made my interests shift a bit towards other projects.

Anyway. There's progress:
- The Software (for an Attiny25) is almost done
- The HF part is done (see picture)
- The µC board is also almost done

Question: I got a Cystall for 10.240MHz. Suitable? I found no services I might affect nor seems this frequency crowded. I also have 10.110 Mhz Crystalls but I like to forsee from annoying the CW'ers.

I also changed te type of Antenna I'm going to use. I've build a MicroVert for 10.240Mhz. Works fine and solves my problem with long wires.

Best Regards,
~Zazzle
Title: Re: 1,5 CW beacon project - Concept questions
Post by: Zazzle on June 26, 2014, 0945 UTC
Hey,

I got a question. With about 1W TX-Power I have to keep an eye on my Battery balance, especially during winter. I aim for long operation hours, therefore I have to make a trade-off between the following parameters:

- Length of signs: the longer the sign the more power is consumed.
- Space between signs: the longer the space the more likely that the Beacon gets overheard.
I can't stick to the usual ratio of 1:3 between DIT and DAT because the power consumption would be the same, regardless of long or short signal duration.

So I need your opinion on the following timing:

DIT = 0,7s = 5
DAT = 2,1s = 15
SIGNSPACE = 5s = 50
WORDSPACE = 10s = 100

My timer allows 100ms steps.

What's your opinion?

With best regards,
Zazzle
Title: Re: 1,5 CW beacon project - Concept questions
Post by: ff on June 26, 2014, 1500 UTC
I need your opinion on the following timing:

DIT = 0,7s = 5
DAT = 2,1s = 15
SIGNSPACE = 5s = 50
WORDSPACE = 10s = 100

My timer allows 100ms steps.

Good to see you're still with it Zazzle and nice looking build!  I have precisely ZERO experience with beacons so please regard my comments as opinion.  To me, your dats are a bit fat.  I'm guessing that dit=5 and dat=10 are long enough.  The wordspace=100 will probably be OK but I'd shorten up the signspace, maybe to 20 or so.  Just my take on it...
Title: Re: 1,5 CW Beacon Project - On Air Now
Post by: Zazzle on February 12, 2015, 1306 UTC
Hey everyone!

ah, f# this. I finally got this project done. :)

Of course. I wanted it Solar powered. I wanted it to not only transmit the Locator but also the Battery Voltage and Temperature. And it should include a good charge controller and a low-battery protection function and so on. In the end I got frustrated because it always felt like spending too much work on a project that gets liekly stolen/damaged anyway. Also, after observing the mount of sun (and therefore energy available during winter during the last monts) I came to the conclusion: even a 240W Module would not provide enough energy during winter to have the transmitter operating during night under every conditions.

I reminded myself of a simple but remarkable quote from the movie Contact. Ted Arroway: "Small moves, Ellie, small moves."

So I started programming the AVR controller doing just one thing: providing the key-ing signal. I got my motivation back after that and spend my last Saturday getting everything ready.

I forsaw from using a Solar powered system (but I have plans for a new one. 7MHz this time. Solar powered. But I'll disassemble it during winter so it works fine with a 20W module during Summer. Small enough to hide it).

My location of choice is now an old industrial ruin around the corner. I know every corner of it and it's close by. Perfect. AND there's grid power available from a pumping station that decontaminates the groundwater. The cables run all across the areal.

So, it's on air since Sunday afternoon. It broadcasts: "<LOCATOR> LIFE IS COMMON LIFE IS PRECIOUS <LOCATOR> 1W TX ALL DAY LONG" [RETURN]

The Frequency is 10.240MHz (okay, 10.238,5MHz exactly)

So I called this station "Common and Precious #1". Now, let me spam this thread a bit so I can post more pictures :)

The pictures show the transmitter in its weather proof housing.


Greetings,
Zazzle
Title: Re: 1,5 CW Beacon Project - On Air Now
Post by: Zazzle on February 12, 2015, 1312 UTC
Murphy is not my friend! After having it running with a dummy load for days (in the fridge and in the stove to check how it behaves with different ambient temperatures) it suddenly started to run postal and oscillate like mad after adding a shield. But some blocking capacitors and lowering the amplification of the oscillator stage solved the issue. I now have a small intermodulation because of stray capacitance but the double PI-Lowpass takes care of that. An FFT analysis shows: harmonics are within the limits and the output looks fine.
Title: Re: 1,5 CW Beacon Project - On Air Now
Post by: Zazzle on February 12, 2015, 1353 UTC
Finally, photos of the setup.

Sunday. Installation. First problems:
The signal strength around on the receiver side drops to S1 within ~300m. (Icom IC-90, Set ti AM, Narrow). At home,~5km air line, I got a S1 signal with my NRD-525 and a large wire dipole (in the garden) as well.

Wednesday. Checking for problems. Changing the position.
I went on the roof again and mounted the transmitter on a 3 meter long wooden slat The antenna is now installed as a "wannabe Inverted V". The angle is quite low.

The Signal got better. S3 300 meters away and S2 at home. I also noticed that I may have cut the Dipole wires too long while preparing everything at home. I've calculated 6,85 meters per side. It looks like I accidently cut them to 7.9m or maybe even 8.9m. Since I had no folding rule along... a check is on my list for today. But it would explain the low emission. Feeding point mismatch. I may also add another meter to the wooden slant.

The voltage at the output measures around 8,5Vrms into a 50R Dummy Load, which equals approx 1,5W HF.

Geeky me. I also took a handheld DSO along yesterday. The signal on the Transmitter output looks fine while it's working. Clear sinewave. Voltage stays around ~8Vrms

But I'll open another thread on the antenna issue since I have more question on that topic.

Greetings,
Zazzle
Title: Re: 1,5 CW Beacon Project - On Air Now
Post by: Zazzle on February 17, 2015, 1103 UTC
Morning!

So, I finally had a look at the Antenna last weekend. Indeed, I had cut the Dipoles way too long. Approx 9m instead of 6,85. No idea how that happened. The signal increased (especially in quality) after cuting both wires down. I also changes the support wires to Nylon.

Still, I'm not satisfied with the field. The next thing I'll try is a 1:1 BalUn. Feeding the Dipole with a balanced Signal may help.

Greetings,
Zazzle
Title: Re: 1,5 CW Beacon Project - On Air Now
Post by: Zazzle on March 08, 2015, 2311 UTC
Good evening!

It's been a while. Projects at work. And not to mention that spring's here. The garden wants attention as well. Anyway. Time for some updates!

I've been on the roof today night and disassembled the Transmitter. That was fun. Obviously, people have been up on the roof. There was a chair (which hasn't been there before) and a - believe it or not - big Dart disk. Funny thing. People have been playing Dart up there. That's why I love this city. Silly people over and over. On the other hand those people have shown no interest in damaging the Transmitter/Antenna/etc. Which I'm grateful for. Psysically and function-wise the Transmitter survived the first weeks of operation. Good!

There are some things on the list that I want to try out on the workbench and in my backyard. The latter regards possible Antenna options and a better impedance matching.


Stay tuned. :)
~Zazzle
Title: Re: 1,5 CW Beacon Project (on air, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on May 19, 2015, 1249 UTC
Hi there,

I came to the conclusion that my setup works properly. The signal looks fine. The field is strong (hence, yes, RF is emitted) and other readings look fine, too. So, I guess the Antenna position is too low and the city around interfers with the signal.

Last week I put the transmitter back into operation. There's no use in having it rotting at home in the basement. So it can rott on the roof and do some work meanwhile. Maybe, eventually, in case fortuna likes me, someone will hear it. ;p

Maybe, in case I'm bored and feel funny, I may try a 1/2 lamda Dipole.

The exakt frequency is 10.237,74MHz. Changes a bit with the ambient temperature.

So, done so far.

Greetings,
Zazzle
Title: Re: 1,5 CW Beacon Project (on air, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on May 20, 2015, 1229 UTC
Hey,

YES! A reward! Finally! About two hours ago I could hear my own beacon in Enschede (NL, Europe) which is about 470km away. S5-S6.

http://websdr.ewi.utwente.nl:8901/, 10237.74Mhz, CW-Narrow

That also means, that, yes, I was right. The Transmitter works fine. It just seems that it's not creating a local field but radiates into the room. I received the signal through a reflection (as it seems). This behaviour may be caused by the construction of the roof.

Anyway, now, that I know that it's working I have my motivation back. I'm going to have a look at it on the next weekend. Maybe I'm able to extend the poles about 1-2 meters, getting some distance between the Dipole and the roof construction.

Greetings,
~Zazzle
Title: Re: 1,5 CW Beacon Project (on air, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: ChrisSmolinski on May 20, 2015, 1809 UTC
Congratulations!

I just checked via the Twente SDR, and could hear CW there as well.  I can try listening here in the USA, once it is later, and we might have better propagation on 30 meters.
Title: Re: 1,5 CW Beacon Project (on air, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: curious george on May 21, 2015, 0027 UTC
Zazzle,

Check the Beacons forum, I think Chris and I have logged it here in the USA.  I can e-mail you an audio file, but I don't have an e-mail address for you.
Title: Re: 1,5 CW Beacon Project (on air, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on May 21, 2015, 1218 UTC
Hi there,

 *bows* thank you for the reports. That just made my day. :)

Actually, I'm pondering to add a 5W Amp. Just for the heck of seeing how much the signal propagation would change. I see to this on the weekend. And, yeah, I'm all motivated now - since I know that it works properly. :)

Kind regards,
~Zazzle

Title: Re: 5W CW Beacon Project (on air, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on June 08, 2015, 1124 UTC
Hi,

It's been some weeks again. But there's also news!

I couldn't resist and added a 5W PA. The system is operating again since last night. That fun and I was able to run several experiments with different filters. The actual one is way more reluctant to reflected power than the former one. Btw: the SWR is about 1:1.3, which is pretty neat.

Some funny impressions from last night:

Edit: Oh, I put the antenna bit higher. Approx 5m above the roof by now.

Greetings,
~Zazzle
Title: Re: 5W CW Beacon Project (on air, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: ff on June 08, 2015, 1345 UTC

  • Jep! There's a security service visiting the old ruin every few hours during the night. But it's like with security shown in movies. They aren't quiet and thye drive around on the complex with headlights full on, like "hide, we're comming!" :D

LOL!  I'm sure security would rather find a place to nap than to find an intruder!  What current is the 5 watt amplifier drawing?  Does that kill the battery before dawn?  Good project Zazzle! 
Title: Re: 5W CW Beacon Project (on air, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on June 09, 2015, 0707 UTC
Hey ff!

Thanks. :)

LOL!  I'm sure security would rather find a place to nap than to find an intruder!

Heh, seriously. If I were to catch intruders I'd either enter the areal with headlight off or wait hiden somewhere, all quiet and with lights off too, after I pretended to have left the ground.

What current is the 5 watt amplifier drawing?  Does that kill the battery before dawn?

920mA Key-Down. On on stanby it's approx 110mA. The oscilallator is running all the time. The PA-Driver (which is also the buffer) is keyed.

No Battery. It's grid powered. I just ran approx 70m of wire across a hidden path. Don't ask where I get the power from and I don't have to show you funny but ugly Photos. :D

Kind regards,
~Zazzle
Title: Re: 5W CW Beacon Project (on air, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: ChrisSmolinski on June 09, 2015, 2120 UTC
Your beacon is just now starting to fade in, at 2120 UTC.
Title: Re: 5W CW Beacon Project (on air, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on June 23, 2015, 2130 UTC
Hi there,

looks like there's an issue. It's consuming power but doesn't output RF. Going to check that on the upcomming weekend.

~Zazzle
Title: Re: 5W CW Beacon Project (in maintainance, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on June 27, 2015, 2149 UTC
Hey,

Odd. The SMPS PSU died. Looks like the transformer has gone short. Internal insulation fault. Anyway, not much of a deal. I'll replace it tomorrow.

Greetings,
~Zazzle
Title: Re: 5W CW Beacon Project (in maintainance, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on June 28, 2015, 2159 UTC
Hey there!

Fixed aaaaand back in operation. Hope that was the last issue for several months to come. :)

~Zazzle
Title: Re: 5W Text Beacon Project (operating, CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on July 01, 2015, 0933 UTC
Mornin,

I spend yesterday evening with reading a lot of stuff about "Regular Dipoles VS Inverted-V Dipoles". I'm left with the impression that there's no statement that can be trusted. One side says that an Inverted-V Antenna does, contraty to an regular Dipile, ratidate rather omnidirectional and in a lower angle. Other sources say that that a Dipole that isn't hung in a height that's at least 5x the wavelength, doesn't radiate directional (like it should) anyway.

I'm tempted to change Antenna configuration from "Regular Dipole" to "Inverted-V" but wonder what your opinions might be on that topic. :)

Kind regards,
~Zazzle.
Title: Re: 5W Text Beacon Project (operating, CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: ak7v on July 01, 2015, 1703 UTC
The main practical difference will be a change in feedpoint impedance.  An inverted vee is closer to the 50 ohms that most ham radio transmitters prefer (I'm not sure what your TX is looking for).  It's also usually easier to erect, so it's a popular configuration.  I've never heard of anyone intentionally putting a dipole 5x the wavelength high.  To me that seems excessive.  At 13Mhz putting the apex of an inverted vee up 30-40 feet is good for near-omni radiation at a reasonable take-off angle.  Beyond that you start getting into diminishing returns for the amount of effort.

If you want to get fancy, there is free antenna modeling software out there what will show you the radiation patterns of different configurations at different frequencies.  EZNEC and 4nec2 are examples.  Antenna theory is a deep and complex subject, but there are answers out there! 
Title: Re: 5W Text Beacon Project (operating, CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on July 07, 2015, 1346 UTC
Hey AK7V,

those are the most dominant traits, yes. The main reason for my question regards the angle in which the signal is radiated. In my case I don't have just a (wet) soild but a big steel based construction under the roof. Professional literature says one thing, lots of blogs/websites/foums say another thing so I was interested in more opinions. I guess the literature is more about the theoretical behaviour, not really paying attention to the environment (that has a big effect on the Antenna. Like feed point impedance and radiation angle).

Kind regards,
~Zazzle

Title: Re: 5W Text Beacon Project (operating, CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on July 07, 2015, 1352 UTC
Hey,

I changed the Antenna configuration from "Straight Dipole" to "Inverted V Dipole" last weekend. That was a good thing to do because the Beacon can now be heard in Enschede (WebSDR)  for a lot of hours each day with a strong signal of about S6. Sometimes even S7 and above.

Also the local field has improved, too. With my new (also Inverted V Antenna) in the backyard I get it with S9.

Made me quite happy. Now, let's wait for reports. :)

Kind greetings,
~Zazzle
Title: Re: 5W Text Beacon Project (operating, CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on July 30, 2015, 0928 UTC
Hey,

Changed the Antenna configuration back to straight Dipole. The local field was nice but the reception in Enschede dropped a great deal.  Also, I took some photos (finally).


Whole Setup 1 (https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/sc/74nm15t3clrwgfh/AACXrCPkPXBNnGlFLZ_fFETBa/0?token_hash=AAGmG89Q63VbflaaZcNGMRCGD6eykpiM9zIpDl8d2wRloA&expiry=1438250940)
Whole Setup 2 (https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/sc/2yqft23x3rq8j9a/AACpvx7RX1MjxzJei6rOAbpGa/0?token_hash=AAGmC8gpdfHxhDV47Pdl46ZjXWMvcSvw8nZcbS0SWsKhrw&expiry=1438251441)
Whole Setup 1 (https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/sc/p71n0pc6nta4xqt/AAAgvCWSavfsp1e9H9EXR6Vna/0?token_hash=AAFbGuFxx-Y9ZUCbrcKYp8SjX9eFrJ3d3c4J7sXvz2jyjw&expiry=1438251087)
Pole (https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/sc/ypnhalbr53hisxr/AAAijo6TkXNf24t6u9DfO1kSa/0?token_hash=AAGRfB9gRXZsiYtlkOFNrj-LCQoVQOKFtuy4QHINdHgWow&expiry=1438251057)

Greetings,
~Zazzle
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on August 11, 2015, 2319 UTC
Hahaha, yes! ;D

http://sv1xv.blogspot.de/ (http://sv1xv.blogspot.de/)

I've been wondering when (and how) this will happen for months by now. I'm taking about Google-Hits regarding the Beacon. People receiving it, wondering what it is and posting stuff. Awesome. Makes me grin right now.

I think I'll ask someone to forward that guy a QSL card. Let's see his reaction to the fact of suddenly receiving such a card from a station he's been wondering about. That could be funny! :D

~Zazzle
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on August 31, 2015, 1415 UTC
Hey,

Maintenance post. We had some storms recently so I went out for a check last night. I was quite amazed to see that the whole setup stood up against the beautiful night sky like it did when I saw it last time. Funny how much stress this cheap (but well considered) setup can withstand.  Also, given how many people (Graffity sprayers, etc.) run around on that industry yard, I'm also amazed that it didn't fell linto the hands of teenagers with too much energy left. So, jep, nothing to complain. :)

Btw: I made this chart yesterday.

~Zazzle
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: SV1XV on August 31, 2015, 1819 UTC
Hahaha, yes! ;D

http://sv1xv.blogspot.de/ (http://sv1xv.blogspot.de/)

I've been wondering when (and how) this will happen for months by now. I'm taking about Google-Hits regarding the Beacon. People receiving it, wondering what it is and posting stuff. Awesome. Makes me grin right now.

I think I'll ask someone to forward that guy a QSL card. Let's see his reaction to the fact of suddenly receiving such a card from a station he's been wondering about. That could be funny! :D

~Zazzle
Hi Zazzle, I just noticed the link to my blog - thanks. Costas SV1XV
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: SV1XV on September 09, 2015, 1855 UTC
Today I visited the Post Office and found a QSL card for "Common and Precious" reception. Thank you very much!

QSL Common and Precious (http://www.ipernity.com/doc/777361/39587700)

Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on September 11, 2015, 0912 UTC
Hey!

Heh! I though you might like a surprise QSL Card and hoped you won't be upset because I googled for your address. :)

~Zazzle


Today I visited the Post Office and found a QSL card for "Common and Precious" reception. Thank you very much!
QSL Common and Precious (http://www.ipernity.com/doc/777361/39587700)
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: SV1XV on September 11, 2015, 0948 UTC
Not at all, my address is no secret after all; it is published on QRZ.COM etc ham sites.



Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: skeezix on September 13, 2015, 2051 UTC
I've been listening for the station, but have yet to hear it.  Persistence will pay off.


Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on September 14, 2015, 1245 UTC
I've been listening for the station, but have yet to hear it.  Persistence will pay off.

Thank you for Listening! :)
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: syfr on December 21, 2015, 0127 UTC
OK, a new DX target ...

I'll be tuning!

Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on March 09, 2016, 1223 UTC
Good afternoon,

Oh look! Spring's ahead! It's time to quit hibernating and get active here again! No, seriously, other stuff absorbed me during Winter and I almost forgot to check this place. Sorry for all those pending QSL-Card requets. I'm digging through the backlog today.

Anway! I checked the setup last weekend after not doing so for months. I was amazed to see: it's how I left it last time. In full working condition with no damages, both in electrical and mechanical terms. Which surprised me since we experienced some nasty storms during the last couple of months.

Also, last year during the installation I had my doubts that it will even surive a month without damage (on purpose). But,well it made it's way to it's first anniversary without any damage - except a broken PSU. But that doesn't count.

Hooray, I guess. :)

Kind greetings, Zazzle.

Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: AntiRecoveryUnit on March 30, 2016, 1811 UTC
Hello!  Your beacon seems to be s2 to s9+20 daytime here in Finland. Fading away when sun sets.
I have now checked it daily, and it's there. Qrg seems to fade about 50hz max!
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on April 08, 2016, 1108 UTC
Hi there AntiRecoveryUnit,

Thank you for the report! Can you send me some additional details, like locator, via DM? I can send you a QSL-Card, in case you want one. :)

Kind greetings,
~Zazzle
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on May 19, 2016, 1203 UTC
Hey,

Ops. The Beacon has ceased operation.

I couldn't hear it yesterday so I had a look at the setup. To my reliev, I found everything in the state I left it last timne. Nothing got stolen and/or vandalised. Since I had no instruments with me, I coudln't run tests (i.e. checking if power was still present). I'll do that on the upcomming weekend.

I suspect it's either a problem with the power cable or with the PSU inside the beacon. CW-Operation is a lot of stress for SMPS PSUs and I wouldn't be surprised if it broke (again).

Well, let's wait and see.

Kind Greetings,
Zazzle
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on July 11, 2016, 0918 UTC
Hi!

Jop! Like suspected, the PSU broke down. Something caused the fuse to blow. It's odd. The EMI-filter on the line-input looks like it had to endure high currents. The insulation on the copper wire bubbled up.

Hadn't a closer look at the issue so far. But regardless of the cause, the PSU will be replaced entirely.

Greetings,
Zazzle
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on September 08, 2016, 1050 UTC
Hi there!

Eh. THAT took a while. After becomming aware of the fact that not only the PSU had gone faulty I somehow had a hard time getting my ass up and look at the issue. Eventally I had a look and, well, it was a fix that took only 5 minutes. The protection Z-Diode on the collector of the driver Transistor had gone short.

We had several big summerstorms recently. With a lot of lighning. I guess a parasitic stray field from a lightning strike nearby made it go short. It's a 33V Diode and the amplitude of the HF hardly reaches the 10Vss peak.

Replaced it. Works again.

Brought the Beacon back on air on Tuesday night.

Kind greetings,
~Zazzle
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on October 30, 2016, 2229 UTC
Hi,

looks like I've been the victim of vandalism for the first time since I put the Beacons on the roof. But the whole situation is pretty confusing.

One of the support poles were down, shattered into pieces. The fragments look like someone had been hitting them with a big, sharp object, like an axe or machete.
I wonder who climbs up to the roof (not that easy) with some big knife to damage one pole? Power cables, antenna wires and everything else was left untouched.
Curious. When someone intended to go all postal he could just damage all Beacon setups in less than 5 minutes to the point beyond repair.

My current guess is, that it were some kids that started with the first pole and ran off when it came down.

As a result one half of the Dipole were down. So far I could bring it up with some quick fix. Still, it won't radiate properly with the current angle.

Therefore this Beacon runs currently with restrictions. If the weather is on my side next weekend I'm gonna install a new support pole. If things are worse than I was able to see in the dark  I also need to replace the entire half of the Dipole.

Oh well, could have been worse. :)

Kind greezings,
Zazzle.
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on November 23, 2016, 1150 UTC
Hey,

Some progress:


I was mistaken.

I always assumed that hardly anyone would climp the roofs on that old industrial yard. But a visit on a sunny day after weeks of shitty weather made me stand corrected. There were six (6!) other people climbing roofes on the yard. Some kids, some creative guys with spray paint and some that looked like they were up to no good.

Well, after pondering my options for a moment I decied to go on. There's no way I can do anything against vandalism. Expect the hope, that when they see somone working on the poles, they might understand that it's someones project and nothing that's meant to be damaged.

Greetings,
Zazzle

Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: ChrisSmolinski on June 18, 2017, 2135 UTC
I am hearing what sounds like your beacon on 10237.7 kHz (approximate, as it is very weak) at 2135z on 18 June 2017.
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (5W CW, 10.237,74MHz)
Post by: Zazzle on June 19, 2017, 1141 UTC
Good evening!

Hey Chris! Thank you a lot! :)

Maintainance report:  had to fix some support wires that broke during the recent storm. Looks like the fabric got weak due to the UV radiation. I replaced the wires with a type that's UV resistant. Everything else looks fine. I guess sooner or later one of the support poles will give away. After almost three years of sun and rain it looks ... well... tired. :)

Kind greetings,
Zazzle
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (on air, 10.237,5kHz, 5W)
Post by: AntiRecoveryUnit on June 25, 2017, 1142 UTC
Hello! Looks like i'm able to hear Your beacon almost 24/7 on summer  ;D

30meters, what a band :D
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (on air, 10.237,5kHz, 5W)
Post by: Zazzle on June 27, 2017, 0823 UTC
Hey!

Hello! Looks like i'm able to hear Your beacon almost 24/7 on summer  ;D
30meters, what a band :D

nic eto hear. Thank you for the report. :)

Kind greetings,
~Zazzle
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (OFF air, 10.237,5kHz, 5W)
Post by: Zazzle on July 17, 2017, 1150 UTC
Hi,

Status Update: This one is off air. Since about 10 days.

So far I can't say why. It died along with the 40m band Beacon. Since we had some thunderstorms lately..I suspect that the stray field of a nearby lightning strike fried the PA. When standing under the Antenna can I hear a weak key'ed signal from the oscillator/driver in my mobile scanner. So I guess only the PA stage died. Soooo annoying.

Kind greetings,
Zazzle
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (OFF air, 10.237,5kHz, 5W)
Post by: Zazzle on November 08, 2017, 1100 UTC
Hey,

baaa. I'm slooooow. Finally found the motivation to uninstall the whole beast and take it home. There's some issue with the seperate amplifier. The screws are corroded. Haven't dealt with that so far.

But I've been rebuilding the dipole.
+ Thicker wire
+ Proper BalUn
+ Adjustable LC impedance matching. (10-15R:50R)

Got a new toy. A55 Zoom Antenna Analyzer. So much fun. :)

Greezings,
~Zazzle
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (OFF air, 10.237,5kHz, 5W)
Post by: autovon on November 08, 2017, 2354 UTC
I enjoyed listening for your beacons at my old QTH.  Hopefully will be able to catch some soon again.  Keep up the good work; we're glad you are doing these projects.
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (OFF air, 10.237,5kHz, 5W)
Post by: Zazzle on November 09, 2017, 1135 UTC
Hey Autovon!

Thanks for your kind words. :)

I enjoyed listening for your beacons at my old QTH.  Hopefully will be able to catch some soon again.  Keep up the good work; we're glad you are doing these projects.

Mind telling me which your old QTH was?

Kind greetings,
~Zazzle
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (OFF air, 10.237,5kHz, 5W)
Post by: ChrisSmolinski on November 09, 2017, 1426 UTC
I look forward to hearing this beacon when it is back on the air. Is the 6.398.5kHz beacon on now?
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (OFF air, 10.237,5kHz, 5W)
Post by: autovon on November 09, 2017, 2244 UTC
Old QTH was the UK.  The beacon signals were audible most days there.
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (OFF air, 10.237,5kHz, 5W)
Post by: Zazzle on November 13, 2017, 1124 UTC
Hey Chris!

I look forward to hearing this beacon when it is back on the air. Is the 6.398.5kHz beacon on now?

Si, it is. :)

Kind Greetings,
~Zazzle
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (OFF air, 10.237,5kHz, 5W)
Post by: Zazzle on February 26, 2018, 1456 UTC
Hey,

Just you know... this one's still on my desk. Since it's 3 years old it'll get some mods and a new antenna.

Kind Greetings,
Zazzle

Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (OFF air, 10.237,5kHz, 5W)
Post by: syfr on June 27, 2018, 1609 UTC
I enjoyed list e ring to the 30m signal. Hope you get the time to get it running but I sure know how life gets in the way of hobbies.
Title: Re: Beacon Project "Common and Precious" (OFF air, 10.237,5kHz, 5W)
Post by: Zazzle on July 17, 2018, 1932 UTC
Heyho!

I enjoyed list e ring to the 30m signal. Hope you get the time to get it running but I sure know how life gets in the way of hobbies.

thank you for the motivating words. It's on the todo-list along with some other projects but I'm sure I'll manage sooner or later this year! :)

Greetings,
Zazzle