HFU HF Underground
General Category => General Radio Discussion => Topic started by: ChrisSmolinski on May 05, 2022, 1133 UTC
-
A bill authored by Sen. Josh Becker, D-Menlo Park, that would require law enforcement agencies throughout California to find alternatives to encrypting their radio communications cleared its first hurdle Tuesday when the Senate Public Safety Committee voted to advance the legislation.
https://paloaltoonline.com/news/2022/04/19/becker-bill-to-remove-police-radio-encryption-picks-up-support
-
If anyone has any smarts they should also look at repealing that stup bill which blocks cell phone bands in receivers destined for USA.
-
" The decision by a number of law enforcement agencies to fully encrypt communication greatly limits the ability of journalists to serve the public."
This proposed legislation would be bothersome if journalists would actually serve the public, not themselves.
-
Regardless, I fully support this. I shouldn't have to own a $3K radio and have a buddy get me keys just to hear how my tax dollars are being wasted. Anything to promote government accountability I'm in favor of.
+-RH
-
The biggest thief in my town was the mayor's son along with a crew of his buddies ,who cruised around in car equipped with the same transceiver the police and fire dept. used. That little turd went on an eight year theft spree and never spent a day in court or jail.
-
Transparency. What a concept.
-
Agree with all comments above. Locally, the Highway Patrol is not encrypted, and when certain events take place, the radio is often the only way to have any clue what actually happened. I'm thinking of a particular situation a few years ago, none of the details made the local news. As said above, "journalism" these days is a joke, and their stories are weak at best, outright propaganda most of the time. It could actually help the public image of the police (not sure if that's this politician's idea, probably not).