We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - GC

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7
1
SDR - Software Defined Radio / Re: SDR cable
« on: February 11, 2020, 1850 UTC »
Yes, commonly listed as USB printer cable. These are male A to male B cables like this one:


https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/usb-cables/7587494/


That is of course assuming your computer or laptop has the matching USB A female port and not something unusual like a mini/micro/firewire port.


cheers, Graham


2
Utility / Re: CHU Canada on 14670 kHz is back.
« on: April 16, 2019, 2224 UTC »
there is a status page for the CHU Transmissions here:


https://nrc.canada.ca/en/chu-short-wave-station/


nothing for today but then it may not have been updated yet.


cheers, Graham near Ottawa Canada


3
Other / Re: UNID 6990 LSB 2327 UTC 11 Jan 2019
« on: January 12, 2019, 0001 UTC »
don't know if went off the air or faded away but off at approximately 2019-01-11 23:55 utc


TDOA hasn't helped, I get fixes all over North America with no consistency from fix to fix.


cheers,

4
Other / Re: UNID 6990 LSB 2327 UTC 11 Jan 2019
« on: January 11, 2019, 2340 UTC »
now on 3500kHz  at 2019-01-11 23:35 UTC


cheers, Graham near Ottawa Canada


5
I had my son in law listen to these recordings including one from 3500 kHz LSB.


He is Mohawk and speaks some of this aboriginal language.


He has positively identified these as being "native". He describes the transmissions as "short answers" and "responses". He recognised a few words, definitely words like "STOP" and "REPEAT".


He was not sure of the dialect, maybe Mohawk, maybe not, wasn't sure.


Pesky "Wind Talkers" perhaps?


cheers, Graham near Ottawa Canada

6
Peskies / Re: Chanting Pesky 6990 LSB 2100 UTC 2 Jan 2018
« on: January 04, 2019, 0004 UTC »
Good evening all,


On the UDXF groups.io list there have been some recent postings regarding a "Japanese numbers station" on 3500kHz LSB.



One of the posters had posted a short recording of the activity on 3500kHz. I had a quick listen and compared to the recordings posted here and to my ear they sound the same and quite likely the same "speaker".


Still no idea of what this is however. 


Definitely not Japanese, doesn't sound like Chinese or Korean  but it does sound sort of Asian but also sounds a bit like one or another North American aboriginal dialects.


some of the clues of being just below one of the amateur radio bands (i.e. 3500, 6990) and LSB vs USB point to something that is quite likely unlicensed (i.e. pirate of some sort).


I recall seeing a posting somewhere of someone using kiwiSDR TDOA and got a fix around Boston.


This interesting mystery continues.


cheers, Graham near ottawa Canada
 

7
HF Mystery Signals / Re: All 1 PPS pip / pulse / tick logs here please
« on: November 18, 2018, 2011 UTC »
Andrea,


yes, that sounds and on the waterfall looks like the 1 PPS pip / pulse / tick that has been discussed.


cheers, Graham ve3gtc near Ottawa Canada


8
HF Mystery Signals / Re: All 1 PPS pip / pulse / tick logs here please
« on: November 13, 2018, 0220 UTC »
token,
Well reasoned and I doubt that I could convince you otherwise.
I think you are correct, there have been more observations in the amateur radio bands simply due to their being more listeners.
 
There is a what I believe to be a part to this mystery which has not been reported very often. There have been reports of and I have logged on numerous occasions a very wide band signal noted just below the amateur 40m band, on 8MHz and 12MHz; some reports from Europe as well.
I have not done much of any real analysis on this signal other than to note that it appears to be something like PSK/QAM and looks a lot like the Pluto II OTHR on a SDR waterfall but is 25kHz wide whereas I think the Pluto II signal is note quite as wide. Signal strength has been the same as the 1 PPS signal and also seems to be located somewhere near Chicago when I have used the KiwiSDR SDR's to get a TDoA fix. I did not check this evening but a couple of evenings ago I noted this signal around 6800kHz (just a vague recollection as a I don' t have my log handy).
It always pays to be somewhat skeptical even when you have a growing list of evidence that points to one thing. In other words, it is too easy to jump to conclusions when what you think you know is conveniently leading you along.
these are the links to some of the interesting postings on high frequency trading, chicago, and HF antennas (they are also embedded in the links Token provided);
https://sniperinmahwah.wordpress.com/2018/05/07/shortwave-trading-part-i-the-west-chicago-tower-mystery/
https://sniperinmahwah.wordpress.com/2018/06/07/shortwave-trading-part-ii-faq-and-other-chicago-area-sites/
https://sniperinmahwah.wordpress.com/2018/07/13/shortwave-trading-part-iii-fourth-chicago-site-east-coast-patent-regulation-and-farmer-kevin-mystery/
https://sniperinmahwah.wordpress.com/2018/07/16/shortwave-trading-part-iv-sleuthing-examples-research-tools-techniques-deputies-wanted/
I am sure that this mystery has been discussed on other english and non-english web sites; the challenge in searching for them is to search for the right terms and human nature being what it is, everyone and every group will post using somewhat different language making it difficult to find said discussions.
My suspicion is that the 1 PPS signal and the 25kHz wideband signal are related and most likely related to this HFT stuff.  The PPS signal itself likely little more than a measurement tool rather than a conveyor of much data itself but I leave some room for doubt - too few real hard facts and what we have is mostly circumstantial.
cheers, Graham near Ottawa Canada

9
I have been noting this signal as well and my feeble attempts at using the KiwiSDR tdoa function has provided a fix just west of Chicago.


I have also found this signal quite regularily on 12185kHz and have noted some reports on 14462, 7674, and 10222 but have never noted this activity on those last three noted frequencies; one of several my have been noted to being the European end of this circuit.


This signal is pretty easy to find using a SDR - it is usually very strong and has a distinct rather wide bandwidth. My attempt at using the KiwiSDR tdoa on the 12185kHz also provided a fix near Chicago.


cheers, Graham near Ottawa Canada





10
What few reports I have found on this activity are not clear as to whether they actually transmitted on 80m or not. There were a handful of reception reports for WI2XFX on 40m right around 2018-07-31 00:04 and :08 UTC were all of the receiving stations were in the western part of North America: (hopefully the formatting doesn't get messed up):


2018-07-31 00:08  WI2XFX  7.040105  -25  0  BP72  1000  KK6ZIZ  CM88  3055  141 
2018-07-31 00:04  WI2XFX  7.040101  -25  0  BP72  1000  W6EXT  CM87wi  3201  140 
2018-07-31 00:04  WI2XFX  7.040089  -22  0  BP72  1000  SWL-CM98DN  CM98dn  3091  138 
2018-07-31 00:04  WI2XFX  7.040095  0  0  BP72  1000  VE7DXK  CN88fp  2028  129 
2018-07-31 00:04  WI2XFX  7.040105  -16  0  BP72  1000  KK6ZIZ  CM88  3055  141 
2018-07-31 00:04  WI2XFX  7.040100  -26  0  BP72  1000  VE6HFD  DO41ap  2297  106 
2018-07-31 00:04  WI2XFX  7.040099  +2  0  BP72  1000  KPH  CM88mc  3097  141 
2018-07-31 00:04  WI2XFX  7.040100  -10  0  BP72  1000  KP4MD  CM98iq  3093  138 
2018-07-31 00:04  WI2XFX  7.040100  -17  0  BP72  1000  WB6HYD  CM87xi  3204  140 
2018-07-31 00:04  WI2XFX  7.040100  -21  0  BP72  1000  KR6LA  CN90ao  2875  137
2018-07-31 00:04  WI2XFX  7.040100  -22  0  BP72  1000  WW6D  CM88pk  3070  140




cheers, G near Ottawa Canada


11
Propagation / Re: Long delayed echo
« on: July 28, 2018, 2236 UTC »
When you hear hfgcs echo, it's more likely due to several tx sites simulkeying around the world than an actual long delayed echo. Not that it can't happen tho.
that was my first thought also, that Gander may use a second TX located in another area for coverage reasons, there are many HF communication stations that do this.


bingo!  these two comments are right on the mark.


I made a post to the UDXF groups.io list and got some very interesting replies. One knowledgeable individual had all the details and our own Chris S made a comment which provided some additional collaborative evidence.


quote


Well, after some analysis by others on another list, it turns out that I mistaken in my observation that what I heard was a delayed echo.
 
 <quote - my reply on first and another post below>
 I checked the most recent Industry Canada frequency list and you are correct - Iqaluit and Cambridge Bay are still listed as remote TX sites on that frequency (listed as TX 11.2804 MHz which makes it a bit of challenge to search for). And Chris S estimation of "a delay of about 46,500 miles"  all fits as well.
 
So, what I heard was in fact more an interesting bit of propagation where I was clearing hearing both Gander and either their remote transmitter in Iqaluit or Cambridge Bay and the remote transmission had a delay due to relay through a geosat.
 
Not what I thought but still pretty interesting non the less.
cheers, Graham near Ottawa Canada
 
 
 
On 2018-07-28 16:45, wrote:
  <blockquote>
At last check (when I retired from ATC electronics in Canada in mid-2016) Gander had the NAT-D family of frequencies at Cambridge Bay, Iqaluit and if memory serves at Gander NL. The two remote locations are fed via satellite links, and the satellites in geosynchronous orbit are about 22500 miles up so your round-trip calculation of 46000 miles is very accurate. A delay of half a second would not be unreasonable when multiple sites are selected for transmit at QX IFSS. Also, and this may have changed since, the feed to/from YQX actually went to North Bay Ontario then to Telesat for uplinking as Arctic Radio was always at YYB FIC until it was amalgamated into QX IFSS nearly 10 years ago, so additional delay can certainly exist in that process. As to why you heard the echo clearly then it faded may be more to do with changing conditions preventing you from hearing multiple sites continuously. Cheers
<end quote>
</blockquote>And as I said - an interesting bit of propagation  but not what I at first thought it was.

cheers, Graham



12
Propagation / Long delayed echo
« on: July 28, 2018, 1443 UTC »
Early Saturday morning is one of those times I find that I have a bit of quite time that I can spend "spinning the knobs" of my radio.

Around 11:00 UTC (7:00 EDT) I was scanning through 11MHz and came upon a signal that at first I thought was HFGCS on 11175kHz but was not on that frequency.

I thought of HFGCS (i.e. MAINSAIL) due to the "echo" noted on the audio.

However the frequency was 11279kHz and was Gander Radio with an echo of about one quarter of a second (wild guess). At first only Gander Radio was effected and the aircraft transmissions were not. After a short while the echo on Gander Radio's transmissions diminished only to return again for a while and I could hear this same echo on at least one of the transmissions from one of the aircraft but missed which one. This effect did not last that long was effectively gone by about 11:30 UTC.

I attempted to listen to Gander on a couple of the online Kiwi SDR's but was not quick enough - I didn't hear Gander at all on some or only weakly on others.

I managed to make a short recording - about 1:15 in length (14mb in size), I have posted it here:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ix7wo4xgai7xvze/AAAmvMfvBes-Ylk1N2p5gWk1a?dl=0

for anyone who might like to have a listen.

The first part of the recording shows a very clear and distinct echo. About a half minute later it is almost completely gone. Unfortunately I did not get a recording of the aircraft's transmission having the same sort of echo.

I have heard echo's and delays before but this one is the clearest and most distinct that I can recall.

Some consider long delayed echoes to be those of greater than a couple of seconds while others have a much looser definition. A quick search using Google or your preferred search engine will find much food for thought.


cheers, G near Ottawa Canada





13
Very interesting reading indeed.


I am not a die hard follower of the Amelia Earhart mysters but I do find stories such as this interesting.


Another interesting story line can found here:


https://earhartsearchpng.com/earhart-lockheed-electra-search-project/  part 1


https://earhartsearchpng.com/earhart-lockheed-electra-search-project-4/  tangible evidence


https://earhartsearchpng.com/earhart-lockheed-electra-search-project-5/  analysis


read all parts if you have an interest but in any case, the evidence noted on the above posted web pages paints a very different picture than that from the "analysis of hf transmissions" story line and here are other theories as well.


Which is correct? neither perhaps. I don't know but makes for interesting reading.


cheers, G near Ottawa Canada


14
Equipment / Re: Icom IC R-75 comms receiver performance...
« on: July 27, 2018, 1440 UTC »
Sorry... I'm somewhat skeptical of a bucket of dirt in the shack being even remotely useful as a electrical ground. Maybe you can grow a tomato in it, with enough light?  ;D


I was thinking the same thing.  To me it sounds more like a short makeshift counterpoise which may help a bit but is no way a RF ground or earth if you prefer.


cheers, G near ottawa Canada

15
Utility / Re: Misplaced FAX on 11175khz
« on: July 22, 2018, 1352 UTC »
I spent some time listening for this FAX signal and managed to hear it this morning and was able to copy some of the maps being sent.[/size]This facsimile broadcast does in fact appear to KVM70 from Honolulu. What maps transmitted when match the published schedule for Honolulu and one of the maps I did copy a map clearly noted KVM70 on it.Also, after much trying I managed to get the KiwiSDR TDoA to provide a fix - tried at least a half dozen times trying different receivers, all failed but two but those two where reasonably close in agreement that the source was near mid Pacific.As best as I could measure, carrier frequency was near 11177.30kHz and while this frequency was active with this FAX signal, I heard nothing on Honolulu's posted frequencies of 9982.5, 11090, or 16135 kHz.signal strength in Eastern Ontario SINPO 32233. GHFS broadcasts on 11175kHz did not interfere much when they were active. The FAX signal has faded out in Eastern Ontario but is strong on online SDR's in the Western area of North America.copied FAX having KVM70 noted and screen capture of one of my feeble KiwiSDR TDoA attempts:https://www.dropbox.com/sh/7iqtwfq1lbh2a2e/AABUzHB7tpSrd88jaYm5c2M8a?dl=0And this is a link to the NWS NOAA Worldwide Marine Radiofacsimile Broadcast Schedules date September 21, 2017:http://www.nws.noaa.gov/os/marine/rfax.pdfInterestingly, Honolulu VOLMET (also KVM70) is NOTAM'ed US til April 15, 2019; I wonder if there is some connection to this FAX being on this frequency and not the usual ones? cheers, Graham near Ottawa Canada[/size]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7