We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissable in your locale.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Tube Shortwave

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8
91
Let me cut through the marketing-speak:

They have discovered a conductive material with such a low velocity factor that they can use less of it, and therefore lower the Q of their RF conductors to the point that the already hidden, internal antennas will be slightly more internal and hidden.  Oh, and did we mention, less efficient?  They figure there are enough cell sites saturating the urban areas that ghetto saps will not notice.  Those of us in rural areas certainly will.

I long for the analog phone days when I had a 3-watt phone under the seat and an antenna on the roof of the truck.  Man, that thing sounded great.  People sounded like people, not like robots with severe packet loss.

92
HF Beacons / Re: Dual Antenna Test 12889.2 Khz
« on: November 05, 2009, 1429 UTC »
I am QRV!

93
HF Beacons / Re: Dual Antenna test-
« on: November 03, 2009, 1411 UTC »
I am really looking forward to listening for these tests!

94
General Radio Discussion / Re: Horizontal or Vertical Polarization?
« on: November 02, 2009, 0141 UTC »
What you are proposing sounds a lot like the TCI 527 wire log periodic antenna.

http://www.tcibr.com/?PageID=203

I have used the TCI antennas, they are amazing, and really hold up over the years.  Performance is outstanding!

95
HF Beacons / Re: WW (Wild West) are you up to the challenge
« on: October 03, 2009, 0403 UTC »
Copying WW here, but need Argo to do it.  No copy by ear.  Can see it in the noise using Argo though.

96
HF Beacons / Re: New ditter in Death Valley
« on: September 24, 2009, 0427 UTC »
Nothing heard 40 miles SE of Sacramento.

97
HF Beacons / Re: beacon like signal on 7999khz
« on: September 12, 2009, 1612 UTC »
Maybe it's the boys up in Alaska playing with their mega-power moonbounce array again?

98
HF Beacons / Re: beacon like signal on 7999khz
« on: September 11, 2009, 0421 UTC »
Over the horizon radar.

99
General Radio Discussion / Re: Are Sunspots Disappearing?
« on: September 04, 2009, 1649 UTC »
'Global Warming' (Now referred to as 'climate change') is a ridiculous liberal power ploy that seems to be working.  With no facts, only junk science that happens to be easily refutable with actual science, desperate people have swallowed this hook, line, sinker, and boat.

</political rant>

100
General Radio Discussion / Re: Pirate CW net
« on: September 02, 2009, 1610 UTC »
I understand.  Unfortunately, count me out.

101
General Radio Discussion / Re: Pirate CW net
« on: August 29, 2009, 2219 UTC »
I agree about the average QSO on the ham bands.

Well, as I see it, this is your opportunity to change all that!  Fake a callsign if you must skate the rules, but let's do it on the amateur spectrum somewhere.  I would love to participate on a CW net to discuss interesting things (NOT ham garbage), but am not willing to risk my career to participate in a net out of band.



102
HF Beacons / Re: WW project is complete
« on: August 06, 2009, 1420 UTC »
the average ham cant hear
anything that isn't s9  or 50 micro volts at his antenna terminal....


What did you expect from an appliance operator?  The average ham doesn't even know their electrical field from the magnetic field.  Not to mention a resistor from an inductor.  Or, how to build a fixed value antenna matching network.  It is disgusting.

Amateurs as a group are no longer the radio experts that we all could depend on.  They're typically just an out-of-shape joke.  Physically and mentally. 

Somewhere along the way, someone decided that memorizing test answers qualifies one as a radio 'expert'.  That is like saying that giving one, who has never driven, a driver's license makes them an expert driver.

Someone who cannot solder or troubleshoot an RF circuit is now able to memorize some test answers and achieve the rank of 'extra'.  Actually 'earn' the rank?  Perish the thought.

I'll dismount my soapbox now.

103
Spy Numbers / Re: Homebrew numbers startions
« on: July 28, 2009, 0422 UTC »
Been there, done that.

I know of one station that was more than willing to continue operations sending numbers.  However, the op requested a program to convert letters to numbers A=1, B=2, etc. in order to cut down on the amount of time it took the op to prepare the transmissions.  I guess nobody came through.

104
HF Beacons / Re: Another High Frequency Beacon Society Contest
« on: July 22, 2009, 0453 UTC »
This sucks.  Absolutely no signal from CO at all in California.  I guess we couldn't budget enough for ionosphere conditions either.

105
It's too bad robot radio never once gives a tip of the hat to Weather Radio, which was the first robot on the air and a true pioneer.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8
HFUnderground Mug
HFUnderground Mug
by MitchellTimeDesigns