We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - syfr

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 46
316
Equipment / Re: Vertical antenna build questions
« on: June 05, 2020, 1242 UTC »
Transmitting and receiving are reciprocal.   What benefits one, benefits the other.

Its been my experience that in a practical sense one will SEE the benefits of more radials in the reduced bandwidth of the antenna in use as a transmitting antenna (as losses decrease) more than you'll hear the difference. You'll also SEE that adding more beyond a certain practical point (8-10) becomes less and less impactful to the efficiency .  (It's kind of like asymptotically approaching a limit- there's a big diff when you start, but that really tapers off quickly). You can see this with the narrowing of low SWR bandwidth. Its pretty impressive ! :-)  Short, long or in between  length radials, it's hard to tell much practical difference given all the other variable involved in setting up an antenna in all but a uniform, idealized antenna range.

I'd not overdesign on paper chasing that limit, but put up the 1/4 wave with 6-8 radials under it, then play with the spacing, position and length of the director/reflector.  I think you'll notice FAR more of an effect messing with that , than the radials (beyond a few).   I'd get the geometry correct, then add radials, as the directivity and S/N will come from geometry of the array , while the radials will "just"  affect the overall, broad band loss.

317
Is there supposed to be something wrong with people who "sale" stuff?  Is that a bad thing?

People "sale" stuff because there's people who want to buy it... that's true for Stretch and for Chris. I'm pretty grateful for the opportunity.  There's about 10,001 schematics on the web that are free. A lot of them are posted here too, but not everyone wants to assemble a BOM, lay out a circuit board, order parts etc.

  I don't recall either Chris or Stretch refusing to answer any technical questions because they want you to buy their gear, because that never has happened.

Now, we return you to the regularly scheduled axe grinding.



318
digikey does program them, and has 'em to you in 3 days. Cost is $4 including programming.

319
The RF Workbench / Re: Simplest Tx
« on: May 28, 2020, 1315 UTC »
There's likely more LuLu's that have been put on the air than any other design

As with any design, there's always tradeoffs, but it's a solid performer that has been "track tested" for years (decades?)


320
The RF Workbench / More beacon simplicity (and economy)
« on: May 28, 2020, 1308 UTC »
I've messed with a fair number of small beacon circuits and am interested in your comments on this.

I've been using the Epson programmable oscillators for a while, in ISM band HIFER use. They're super cheap ($4 , programmed to your 4 digit places of accuracy). 

https://www.digikey.com/product-detail/en/epson/SG-8002DC-MPT/SG-8002DC-PHC-ND/275176

I'll have to re-measure my HIFER into a 50 ohm resistor, but IIRC it's about 4mW output.    Programming takes 2 days and it's at your door in a week.  What a bargain for FOUR BUCKS.

Following up on Stretch's post of an old familiar CMOS inverter transmitter, I'm going to try replacing what's hanging off pins  11 and 9  in this schematic:

http://new-ham-radio.blogspot.com/2010/07/is-it-possible-to-create-qrp.html

With one of the Epson oscillators.

Keying will be handled by an ATTiny 85 stuffed with any of the million keyer software packages available for download. I've not programmed a Tiny but have done so with a Arduino and I think it can use the same IDE. I have one of the dev boards to mess with and a programmer of fine Chinesium quality.

Given that power budgets are where it's at for solar powered beacons,  Class E is the way to go.  The epson oscillator has a chip enable so keying it from an ATTINY should be straightforward, and the AT TINY can be put into super efficient sleep modes. 

Anyone see any major problems with this concept?   Digikey has decent shipping ($5) in US and they're fast at programming (2 days).

First application will be a QRSS transmitter for 40M, but if this works, the possibilities are endless, and the frequency flexibility of these things is handy.


321
Been playing with the PiZero with WiFi a bit. .  Lotsa capability for 9.99$ and a 1.5 watt consumption.

A 30 min transmission followed by deep sleep for a week, with occasional wakeups to check battery voltage should be workable.

322
The RF Workbench / Re: Simplest Tx
« on: May 28, 2020, 1155 UTC »
Thanks for the info Stretch, and I appreciate the info you've shared here.

Nobody's forcing anyone to purchase anything and all opinions are valuable.

323
Understood Chris, thanks!

Part of this is an experiment to see what a PiZero and an RTL dongle (I know, I know) can survive . I might just erect a full wave loop for 22M , do my best to choke the heck out of a long DC feed line (the last 10 feet of which might be pretty small wire as a fusible link) and see what happens through a summer.   The worst I'm out is about $50 including a small DC supply.   

What I really want is a constant feed , wirelessly from out back. I'm pretty sure the Pi can work the across the yard to my router DX with the digital feed. If I could get a year out of such an arrangement, I'd call it a success .  I think the MSI dongle is pretty affordable, and I could allocate one of those a year or so, if this works, but I"m not likely to put a spendy solution out there. For WSPR and QRSS, I think with a dongle of some sort, and a bandpass filter, I can put up a dedicated WSPR/QRSS monitor ... but we'll see.

324
Hi Chris
I'm not all that far from you (to the south). How do you protect your loops etc from lightning damage ?

325
Hi All,

I have an SDR or two I am going to deploy for HF reception.  I hope to link to them via WiFi to avoid a DC connection to my house.  Power will be a DC feed (yes, a dc connection) but via a  run of "fusible link" thin wire , before connecting to a choke and onward to a DC supply.  The whole arrangement is going to be assumed to be somewhat sacrificial as I live in NC, and lightning  is a way of life.  The idea is that my house is not sacrificial.   

I have a tower and a yagi etc, but that stuff is all disconnected during lightning season except when I'm using it.   I do have about an acre of woods back there with a ton of trees that I can hang things from, though I really don't want to erect something super complicated at this point .

Here's the question.  What recommendations do you have on a broadbandish wire antenna ? Let's assume it's not tunable (so broadband is a poor term!) for HF ?    I've never messed with a loop and I do have one of Chris's  multitap impedance transformers available for this , so those are on the radar screen.  If that's a good solution, what design/dimensions would you recommend?    I guess a G5RV is kind of a loop/folded dipole/squashed loop.

I've got a lot of wire if needed.

Your thoughts appreciated. Chris, what works well for you?

I don't want to put my Kiwi out there, but an MSI SDR might be expendable (I want to stick a RTLSDR dongle out there first just do do a proof of concept on the wireless link, etc).    I know their limitations!

Thanks!



326
SDR - Software Defined Radio / Re: KiwiSDR Sound Client
« on: April 30, 2020, 2135 UTC »
PERFECT!

327
SDR - Software Defined Radio / The new improved openwebrx
« on: April 30, 2020, 2132 UTC »
This deserves its own topic :-)

Regardless of how one views the definition of "OPEN SOURCE"  we're lucky to have this software re-supported by Jakon (DD5JFK).

I'm using it on a couple of RTL SDR dongles and I really like it. Being  a Kiwi SDR owner and fan, the UI is comfortable and doesnt require advanced degrees to operate.  This is really nice software and the new version has a bunch of digital mode decoders built in. I've also hooked up a SDRplay SDR and there's support/installers for others.

There's a Groups.io group to support this and installers are available.    I'm using it with the Soapy connector to enable a pretty decent HF receiver too!

https://groups.io/g/openwebrx/topics

Two thumbs up!
Modify message

328
SDR - Software Defined Radio / Re: 6 years of OpenWebRX
« on: April 30, 2020, 2129 UTC »
Regardless of how one views the definition of "OPEN SOURCE"  we're lucky to have this software re-supported by Jakob (DD5JFK).

I'm using it on a couple of RTL SDR dongles and I really like it. Being  a Kiwi SDR owner and fan, the UI is comfortable and doesnt require advanced degrees to operate.  This is really nice software and the new version has a bunch of digital mode decoders built in.

There's a Groups.io group to support this and installers are available.    I'm using it with the Soapy connector to enable a pretty decent HF receiver too!

https://groups.io/g/openwebrx/topics

Two thumbs up!

329
SDR - Software Defined Radio / Re: Kiwi SDRs
« on: April 29, 2020, 1627 UTC »
Why do they have time limits?

Because some people go to bed and leave their PC connected to an active SDR.


(Kiwis are configurable this way as the admin chooses)

J

330
Rocky is very strong on the KFS SDR right now (5PM PDT)

Good job!

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 ... 46