We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - skeezix

Pages: 1 ... 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 [280] 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 ... 367
4186
Huh? / A Town Is Building a Public Beer Fountain to Attract Tourists
« on: February 12, 2016, 1219 UTC »
http://time.com/money/4217615/beer-fountain-tourist-attraction/

Zalec, a small town in central Slovenia, is famed locally for the hop farms that surround it in what is known as the “valley of green gold.” Soon, however, according to reporting from the BBC, the town is likely be known for something else: a public beer fountain.

The project, which proponents say will create Europe’s first public beer fountain, gently gurgling local brews rather than water, has no set completion date. Once completed, visitors will pay around $6.75 for 10.5 fl oz, served in a commemorative mug, of one of a variety of locally produced beers.

The cost of the fountain—projected to be about $400,000—will be half financed by the city, the rest covered by private donations, according tot he town mayor Jako Kos. Some locals have grumbled that the money could be better spent elsewhere in the community, but the mayor insists the fountain will draw money-spending visitors. “It’s true the fountain won’t be cheap,” he said. “But it’s a development project, a tourism product.”


4187
Huh? / Re: Info on Lincolnshire Poacher
« on: January 09, 2016, 0154 UTC »
Oh, I like it runny.

4188
Huh? / Re: Info on Lincolnshire Poacher
« on: January 09, 2016, 0142 UTC »
You do! Excellent

4189
Huh? / Re: Info on Lincolnshire Poacher
« on: January 09, 2016, 0042 UTC »
I'd like to try that cheese.



4190
Weird., didn't see anything about enforcement of RFI emissions in that document.

Around here,  would go a long way in protecting the AM radio band (amongst other bands).

4191
North American Shortwave Pirate / Re: UNID 6965 AM 2138- 10/11/15
« on: October 11, 2015, 2150 UTC »
Nothing heard here, not even a hint of carrier at 2149 UTC.

4192
MW Loggings / Re: A Morning In The 1490 Graveyard
« on: September 28, 2015, 2306 UTC »
The drop is rather sudden.

Thanks for posting these, they're quite interesting.

4193
http://culture.pl/en/article/how-much-do-you-know-about-polish-history-quiz

Using nanometer-scale components, researchers have demonstrated the first optical rectenna, a device that combines the functions of an antenna and a rectifier diode to convert light directly into DC current.

Based on multiwall carbon nanotubes and tiny rectifiers fabricated onto them, the optical rectennas could provide a new technology for photodetectors that would operate without the need for cooling, energy harvesters that would convert waste heat to electricity - and ultimately for a new way to efficiently capture solar energy.

In the new devices, developed by engineers at the Georgia Institute of Technology, the carbon nanotubes act as antennas to capture light from the sun or other sources. As the waves of light hit the nanotube antennas, they create an oscillating charge that moves through rectifier devices attached to them. The rectifiers switch on and off at record high petahertz speeds, creating a small direct current.

Billions of rectennas in an array can produce significant current, though the efficiency of the devices demonstrated so far remains below one percent. The researchers hope to boost that output through optimization techniques, and believe that a rectenna with commercial potential may be available within a year.

"We could ultimately make solar cells that are twice as efficient at a cost that is ten times lower, and that is to me an opportunity to change the world in a very big way" said Baratunde Cola, an associate professor in the George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech. "As a robust, high-temperature detector, these rectennas could be a completely disruptive technology if we can get to one percent efficiency. If we can get to higher efficiencies, we could apply it to energy conversion technologies and solar energy capture."

The research, supported by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Space and Naval Warfare (SPAWAR) Systems Center and the Army Research Office (ARO), is scheduled to be reported September 28 in the journal Nature Nanotechnology.

Developed in the 1960s and 1970s, rectennas have operated at wavelengths as short as ten microns, but for more than 40 years researchers have been attempting to make devices at optical wavelengths. There were many challenges: making the antennas small enough to couple optical wavelengths, and fabricating a matching rectifier diode small enough and able to operate fast enough to capture the electromagnetic wave oscillations. But the potential of high efficiency and low cost kept scientists working on the technology.

"The physics and the scientific concepts have been out there," said Cola. "Now was the perfect time to try some new things and make a device work, thanks to advances in fabrication technology."

Using metallic multiwall carbon nanotubes and nanoscale fabrication techniques, Cola and collaborators Asha Sharma, Virendra Singh and Thomas Bougher constructed devices that utilize the wave nature of light rather than its particle nature. They also used a long series of tests - and more than a thousand devices - to verify measurements of both current and voltage to confirm the existence of rectenna functions that had been predicted theoretically. The devices operated at a range of temperatures from 5 to 77 degrees Celsius.

Fabricating the rectennas begins with growing forests of vertically-aligned carbon nanotubes on a conductive substrate. Using atomic layer chemical vapor deposition, the nanotubes are coated with an aluminum oxide material to insulate them. Finally, physical vapor deposition is used to deposit optically-transparent thin layers of calcium then aluminum metals atop the nanotube forest. The difference of work functions between the nanotubes and the calcium provides a potential of about two electron volts, enough to drive electrons out of the carbon nanotube antennas when they are excited by light.

In operation, oscillating waves of light pass through the transparent calcium-aluminum electrode and interact with the nanotubes. The metal-insulator-metal junctions at the nanotube tips serve as rectifiers switching on and off at femtosecond intervals, allowing electrons generated by the antenna to flow one way into the top electrode. Ultra-low capacitance, on the order of a few attofarads, enables the 10-nanometer diameter diode to operate at these exceptional frequencies.

Georgia Tech associate professor Baratunde Cola measures the power produced by converting green laser illumination to electricity using the carbon nanotube optical rectenna. Credit: Rob Felt, Georgia Tech

"A rectenna is basically an antenna coupled to a diode, but when you move into the optical spectrum, that usually means a nanoscale antenna coupled to a metal-insulator-metal diode," Cola explained. "The closer you can get the antenna to the diode, the more efficient it is. So the ideal structure uses the antenna as one of the metals in the diode - which is the structure we made."

The rectennas fabricated by Cola's group are grown on rigid substrates, but the goal is to grow them on a foil or other material that would produce flexible solar cells or photodetectors.

Cola sees the rectennas built so far as simple proof of principle. He has ideas for how to improve the efficiency by changing the materials, opening the carbon nanotubes to allow multiple conduction channels, and reducing resistance in the structures.

"We think we can reduce the resistance by several orders of magnitude just by improving the fabrication of our device structures," he said. "Based on what others have done and what the theory is showing us, I believe that these devices could get to greater than 40 percent efficiency."


4194
Quote
The commission reiterates our firm position, ... , that unauthorized broadcast operations within the FM and AM radio broadcast bands — often referred to as pirate radio broadcasting — is strictly prohibited and subject to enforcement measures

Mentions specifically within the FM & AM bands.

So that means SW is of less concern, as well as 87.9 nor 1710 since they're not within the FM nor AM bands. √


Quote
prevent those that may attempt to come online in the future

PreCrime? Until the transmitter is radiating beyond established limits, its not illegal. If I have a 1kW transmitter into a dummy load which has radiation under Part 15 limits, there's nothing illegal about that.


Quote
who has spoken several times this year about the pirate radio problem

What about the RFI pollution problem from zillions of cheap electronics that are not meeting existing regulatory standards? That is a far bigger threat to radio than pirate stations. Yet, nothing is done. In 2001 when I moved into my house, bands were very quiet. Today, its a mess LW through SW. Had to move a MW antenna from my porch to a tree out back because noise in the power lines is swamping the band. And its still not clean, just better than what it was. My nice loop that's waaay out back in the shed now picks up lots of RFI from somewhere, even though not much back there.


Quote
Violations are not to be taken lightly, as the harmful interference caused by pirate operations sabotages licensed broadcasters serving their communities and puts the valuable public safety contributions of these stations in jeopardy to the detriment of the American people who count on them, including diverse and underserved populations.

Does that include the interference from the IBOC digital sidebands to adjacent channels?


Meh.


John, he's off your Christmas card list, but if he sends a reception report, will you send him a QSL card?



4195
I've been listening for the station, but have yet to hear it.  Persistence will pay off.



4196
Shortwave Broadcast / The Mighty KBC 7375 kHz AM 6 September 2015 0000Z
« on: September 06, 2015, 1245 UTC »
They had a good signal when they came on at 0000Z, but two adjacent stations ~10 kHz on either side were causing a fair amount of problems. Made KBC very hard to listen to.



Yaesu FT-847 with homebrew PA0RDT Mini-Whip

4197
SDR with knobs.  Next, personal delivery by Belinda.




4198
Equipment / Re: Palomar VLF Converter
« on: August 26, 2015, 0359 UTC »
Power supply?

I've had one of those for a while and it has a connection for 9V battery. Doesn't seem to eat too many batteries. (On the other hand, I have an SDR that I use for any LW listening these days).




4199
Quote
Our lack of the most basic data on the extent of the problem is unacceptable

So very right.

I moved into my house in 2001 and it was fairly quiet. Today its a big mess of RFI. Even my shed that is 70' from the house and nothing obviously nearby except an underground telephone line, is not quiet.

I doubt anything will be done.

4200
With the lack of sunspots in the forecast for quite a while, it is time to stake out a claim down way on VLF/ELF for a new & improved funny band.

To those that say "what about antennas & bandwidth? What about xmtrs?" I say innovate!







Pages: 1 ... 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 [280] 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 ... 367
HFUnderground T-Shirt
HFUnderground Garden Flag
by MitchellTimeDesigns