We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissable in your locale.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - The Ether Hacker

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 46
406
So just because you have a boat and are out fishing then you can operate outside the amateur bands. I'd guess that the fisherman don't even need to have passed any technical exam or demonstrate any technical competency like hams have to do.
Strikes me as very strange, especially in this day and age of communications. For sure they will have internet at sea these days. They are CB pirates in my eyes

Fishermen don't use the amateur bands, they use the marine bands. And 48m has some marine allocations.

Yet, last night I caught a booming USB signal on 3673 khz every few hours with maritime weather forecasts in English and Dutch by the Netherlands Coastguard, right in the 80 meter amateur band.... high powered too...  they may not be fishermen but it is certainly Maritime radio use...

And I thought the 80 meter band 3600-3800 khz was exclusively for amateur audio and digital mode communication in Europe.

It's RF anarchy out there, lol.

407
SINPO 23322

1940 Usual 1930s style music and IDs

408
Here's a more traditional view, V field only. IN the left plot the dipole is running N-S.



Sorry, but your diagrams are not displaying, ... at least not on my browser

409
I don't remember well about 6220 kHz, but RTE has (had?) a SW service for Irish fellows in Africa. That was once through Meyerton in South Africa, then through relay in Madagascar.


The Meyerton SW TX site near Johannesburg, used for Radio RSA, at the time?  I'm sure the Apartheid regime was glad of RTE's (financial) support ....

410
Interested to know how you discerned this!

Well, there's this leprechaun.....

(Private message sent)

411
If this was such an issue then why was RTE using 6220 KHz some years ago as was Mystery Radio who were jamming out RTE at the time until RTE moved to 6225, again outside the official broadcast bands. Many international broadcasters are using 6200 - 6400 etc, so isn't this guidance out of date?

Are you sure?  I don't think RTE, being a state broadcaster) every (officially) broadcast on shortwave.  There were plans for an official shortwave broadcast service back in the 1950s/60s I think, but apart from one or two St Patrick's Day special broadcasts, nothing came of it, officially.

However, regarding state broadcasters not sticking to international broadcasting plans, this has happened, especially by North Korea, in the past, and other types of broadcast have turned up in the wrong bands, definitely.  And then there are spy/number stations too.


Between the late 1930's and the 1950's, Radio Eireann were on SW regularly on their own transmitters from Athlone, officially.

The more recent broadcasts, both on 6220/5 and 58xx were official relays.

Ah, ok... I stand corrected

412
Seems ok at the moment the SSB idiots have gone away some time ago. Why don't they QSY off to the amateur bands. They shouldn't be there

They were probably swearing Irish fishermen.... it is after all the Maritime band


(split and renamed by moderator Ray)

413
If this was such an issue then why was RTE using 6220 KHz some years ago as was Mystery Radio who were jamming out RTE at the time until RTE moved to 6225, again outside the official broadcast bands. Many international broadcasters are using 6200 - 6400 etc, so isn't this guidance out of date?

Recent example tonight of licensed broadcasters not obeying the ITU international frequency plan.... The Netherlands Coastguard blasting their USB maritime weatherforecast in the middle of the 80 meter Radio Amateur band....

... if a pirate did this for any amount of time... ofcom would be knocking on their door no time...

414
Not agreeing with Jock Wilson about low dipoles: they are not directional.

Confirmed again reading the reference from aa3rl ginen by the Ether Hacker :
a low dipole is equally well (or equally bad) in every azimuth, with the maximum of radiation direct to the clouds. For receiving, a low dipole is sometimes jammed by noise in the clouds just above, even hours before any T-storm. Most of the time, it's a very good receiving antenna.

At low HF frequencies, that idea of low take off angle seems a bad one. Rather look for 'chordal hop' !

It's difficult to say what is a better antenna or not.  There's no correct answer. I think it depends on your (local) situation and what you wish to do and the frequencies on which you wish to do it.  Certainly a dipole, monopole or related array antenna is good for radiating... for receiving I think low noise antennas like Beverage antennas are probably the best I've come across... but they take up a lot of space... nice, if you have it.... and they are not suitable for transmitting, just receiving.... but very, very impressive results

415
What is known about this station?  Any contact information?  Is it linked to Zenith or Harmony?
said to be a relay from a web station,
not really a free one? (only for subscribers of iPhone ?)

The SW relay seems through the Harmony TX

Well, I know a way of checking this.....

You are correct as usual, Ray, this is the same transmitter as Harmony and Zenith, same power, same antenna, same location.

Maybe the owner has leased airtime?

416
1152 No signal here at the moment

417
SINPO 2222  Some talking audible and a weak carrier here at 1152

418
we have been on 6305khz without any trouble from ofcom for a few years now you were right thats why we try to stay on 6305khz .We have been told that ofcom are no longer bothered with radio merlin unless we course interference.We use to use 150 watt but had major problems locally hence the low power

With efficient antenna a reduction from 150 watt to 20 watt only leads to a 9db fall in signal strength so if Radio Merlin registers a signal strength of S9+10db with 150 watt, it's strength will still be S9+1db with just 20 watt... but with much less chance of neighbour interference... so propagation conditions are much more of a factor in a strong signal than transmitter power.  The big stations have to make a lot of effort and power to get signal strengths of S9+40db using massive antenna networks and 100kw or more.

The high power Dutch pirates must generally live areas not close to neighbours.... eventually with high RF power it is inevitable to cause QRM in the surrounding area.

419
Thx for the link.

Merlin closed down abruptly during a song 'lolly, lollipop' sung by a female.

That would have been around 0724 UTC.

I hope it wasn't because of a bust by OFCOM!

They probably close down during the daytime, as propagation is less good.  I have read that Radio Merlin has got caught a few times in the past by OFCOM and it's predecessor the DTI, because they were using the wrong frequencies it was said, and I think this is why they now only broadcast on 6305 khz.  To be honest, I think OFCOM know where they are, maybe they are just not acting against them at this time, higher priorities and less government funding?  It would be different if they transmitted on the FM band, I'm sure... let's just say occupying the FM band involves taking a piece of higher value real-estate in the RF spectrum, as far as the government is concerned.... it's all about money, usually.... although they claim it is due to interference... well maybe it does interfere with their income and finances

There are still a number of UK based pirate stations on shortwave, just not broadcasting as frequently as Merlin.

420
Yep, your reply is informative, and I agree totally with your analysis.

I think it's worth adding that the physical characteristics of his half-wave dipole, namely 4 metres off the ground and slung in an east-west direction must necessarily make it directional as a north-south RF radiator for 6 megs.

I reckon if said radiator were slung higher, it would be less directional up to a critical vertical height when it would become directional again above said critical height.

My memory ain't the best these days, but it tells me for a non-directional dipole, it should be non-sloping and about a quarter of a wavelength off the ground.

If the station were located in the UK, the op would be well advised to sling his half-wave dipole in a north-south direction were his target listenership eastern seaboard North American DXers, of course located across the pond from him.

Any thoughts on what I have added?

Over and out.

There's an interesting article about dipole height and it's affects online: https://www.qsl.net/aa3rl/ant2.html

Johnny Tobacco also uses a low dipole at this time... BUT with his kilowatts of power, he still gets out an impressive signal, including over the pond to the US.... just goes to show what brute RF power can achieve....  but Radio Merlin's power being a modest 20 watt, the signal is generally quite impressive too, considering it's low power.... and it also travels to the East Coast of the US.

Basically, from what I understand, a low dipole will radiate most of it's power straight up in the sky at high angles so "IF" conditions permit NVIS propagation, Radio Merlin will get most of it's power radiated straight down on the UK and surroundings, and I understand that the directionality of such a low dipole is not as great as when it is put up half a wavelength up from the ground, which for 40 meters would be a height of 20 meters above ground!  Such a high dipole would be more directive east-west and the lobes of maximum radiation would be at lower angles benefiting long distance DX when and if the ionosphere allows for this.

Considering how well Radio Merlin's signal is received over Europe and in the UK when conditions allow, with only 20 watt, the relative low height of the dipole might be the most desirable, to be honest, but it should not be much lower or you get more ground losses.

A low dipole (5 meters above ground) is a "cloud warmer" at long hf wavelengths, but can be desirable if you want to try and get a strong "local" NVIS signal when conditions on the band allow for it.... when they don't you'll be sending maximum power to your local flying saucer in space or your friendly nasa astronaut on the space station or moon. ;)

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 46

Item image   Lot of Vaseline Glass Beads

 $14.95