We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Author Topic: Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II  (Read 2606 times)

Offline Radiotech

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II
« on: June 29, 2022, 1909 UTC »
I have spent some time messing around with the Hellschreiber beacon, and got some new ideas for construction and also managed to get a bit more power from it. The circuit is a simple crystal oscillator running at 7140kHz into a C-Class amplifier IRF510.  There is a low pass filter after both the oscillator and the power amplifier and the output is nice looking.

At 13,8v i get 12W at 65% efficiency. The enclosure is a 3" PVC pipe with 3d printed end caps, i hope to seal it from moisture with epoxy glue. In the pipe i will try to fit a small battery pack, and connect a small solar panel. The PVC pipe is better than PE and PP since those wont glue at all.

I put this one in 7140kHz to not disturb people in the CW part of the band.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2022, 2020 UTC by Radiotech »

Offline ~SIGINT~

  • DXing Phenomena
  • *******
  • Posts: 4269
  • N.E. Canada (FN08)
  • .ılılı..ılılı..ılılı..ılılı..ılılı..ılılı.
    • View Profile
    • Milspec Communication Canada
Re: Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II
« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2022, 2127 UTC »
You might want to consider conformal coating the board for long term stability and resistance from the elements. Conformal coating has been applied to PCB for decades and is in wide use in military applications. It also looks like MG Chemicals has this available in aerosol format which will avoid dipping the PCB or trying to brush it on which is mainly used in repair and rework applications.

https://www.mgchemicals.com/category/conformal-coatings/

For the end caps, I would use a silicone based RTV. The same stuff you use around your bathtub will work like a charm. Don't forget to put a small weeping hole in the bottom of the pipe to allow the moisture to escape.

Good luck with the project. It looks good.

Offline Charlie_Dont_Surf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 841
  • Charlie's Point, California
    • View Profile
Re: Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2022, 0134 UTC »
If you do conformal coat, keep in mind that it might affect the operation slightly due to the capacitance of the coating against ground. Yes, the frequency is crystal controlled but that's not what I am talking about.

Also, conformal coating is not a particularly great heat transmission medium; you may find the circuitry also behaves differently due to the increased temperature under the coating. Definitely do not coat the heat sink and the final transistor.

The conformal coating that I have used professionally made rework a pain in the backside.
I don't STRETCH the truth.

cdsurf attt protonmail d0t com

Offline Radiotech

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2022, 1833 UTC »
I continued working on the enclosure today, i am trying to get the board as high as posible in the tube to be able to store batteries under it.

On standby the circuit draws 17mA and the microprocessor 3mA. Probably the voltage regulators use most of it, one 5v for the mcu and one 8v for the oscillator. I will half to think about getting that a bit lower.

Edit: I got the power consumption down to 9,1mA by adjusting the IRF510 bias voltage. The current users are probably as below, it would be nice if i could get the oscilator to run on 5v, since i could take away one of the regulators and get down to 6mA.

On TX at 14,4v it draws 1540mA and puts out just below 15W of RF power.

MCU: 3mA
5v regulator: 3mA
8v regulator: 3mA
« Last Edit: July 03, 2022, 2020 UTC by Radiotech »

Offline Stretchyman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
    • View Profile
Re: Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2022, 1848 UTC »
Why not run class E, way more efficient and will consume far less current for same O/P.

Gave you loads of advice as have others but you seem stuck in the past with a design from the 1950's

Ah well, your batteries will just go flat sooner than they would with a better design.

Str.
« Last Edit: June 30, 2022, 1858 UTC by Stretchyman »
'It's better to give than receive' so why Rx when you can Tx!

                                              ;)

Offline Radiotech

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2022, 1641 UTC »
I got a 14,4v 2500mAh batterypack(from two 6-cell NIMH batterypacks), the tube needs to be a bit longer to fit them how ever. 14,4v will give me 12-ish watts of RF output. Hopefully i can get a small solar panel to charge the batteries. I dont want a complicated charging circuit, but will look into a the possibility of using a relay to cut charging, or short the solar panel.

Without a solar panel the 6mA standby current would exhaust the battery after two weeks or so. Non-stopp TX with 50% duty cycle should last about three hours.


Thank you for the sudgestions on using a better amplifier, I know that there are better designs out there, i might continue experiment with other amplifiers as another project.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2022, 2021 UTC by Radiotech »

Offline Stretchyman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
    • View Profile
Re: Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2022, 1648 UTC »
Another suggestion (I really don't know why I bother!)

Why are you using NiMH?

LiPO, everytime.

Or maybe you should use NiCads ?? ;)


Str.
'It's better to give than receive' so why Rx when you can Tx!

                                              ;)

Offline Radiotech

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II
« Reply #7 on: July 02, 2022, 0556 UTC »
I thought a bit about what battery to use, and decided to use the 7,2v 2500mah NIMH battery because it doesnt really need a charge controller. The price was about the same for both Lipo and NIMH, but the NIMH has a couple up sides.

Pros:


  • Can handle 1/10c(250mA) continous charging
  • Does not break down due to voltage getting too low.
  • Isnt as much of a fire hazard that LiPo is if you handle them wrong

Cons:

  • Lower capacity by weight/size
  • High self discharge
  • Lower current capacity

One possibility with the NiMh is to get a solar panel that provides maximum 250mA, then i dont need a charge controller, the panel could charge the battery indefinetly without any risk of over charging the battery.
« Last Edit: July 02, 2022, 0558 UTC by Radiotech »

Offline Stretchyman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
    • View Profile
Re: Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II
« Reply #8 on: July 02, 2022, 1213 UTC »
What's wrong with a charge controller?

Plenty from CH using multiple cells and cost virtually nothing.

3Series 11.1V 12V 12.6V Li-ion Lithium 18650 Battery Charging Protection Board PCB BMS Module(10-13A) https://amzn.eu/d/7XpfAJs

You seem bent on using old inefficient technology at every step.

I'll leave you to it bud.

I'll await V3!

Str.
« Last Edit: July 02, 2022, 1217 UTC by Stretchyman »
'It's better to give than receive' so why Rx when you can Tx!

                                              ;)

Offline Radiotech

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II
« Reply #9 on: July 03, 2022, 1716 UTC »
I have not got much experience working with MOSFETs, but this perhaps could work as a charge controller. When the batteryvoltage gets above say, 15volts, the attiny45 puts a high on PB5 and shorts out the solar panel to stop over charging the battery.

In this way, if the battery goes dead, there is no voltage needed to start charging the battery. R1 is a simple 10k pull-down. IRF520 should be able to deliver 3 amps with 5v on the gate. Do you think this would work?

« Last Edit: July 03, 2022, 2021 UTC by Radiotech »

Offline Stretchyman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
    • View Profile
Re: Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II
« Reply #10 on: July 03, 2022, 1945 UTC »
Just buy the real thing, it works and has the terminals to solder the batteries in. Just supply wi the correct voltage and leave alone. Charge will terminate at correct voltage and go O/C when near flat. A total no brainer. Comes in LiFePo and Lipo flavours.

Anyone building a beacon would be well advised to use such.

So LiPo, Attiny and class E, + a PCB.

Maybe get round to it one day..

Str.
'It's better to give than receive' so why Rx when you can Tx!

                                              ;)

Offline Radiotech

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II
« Reply #11 on: July 03, 2022, 2019 UTC »
You are probably right streachyman, my designs will never become very usefull or efficient, designing things my self(without propper expertise) and soldering together old parts is probably a waste of time.  :) It is summer time so i will throw out this old project and spend some time in the sun instead  8)

Offline Stretchyman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
    • View Profile
Re: Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II
« Reply #12 on: July 04, 2022, 2110 UTC »
Ha ha! Just that being an Engineer or 'Racio Tech' it's good to try to make the best design is it not? There's load loads of old published designs around that weren't much good when they were current and now with new devices, parts and techniques there's a fairly decent and efficient design to make I think.

Please look at the advice given as I think if heeded you'd have a really good design.

Please design a PCB, they're very simple and so cheap making it a piece of cake to put the circuit together.

Sounds like you're having fun.

Keep it up!

All the best from Blighty.

Str.
'It's better to give than receive' so why Rx when you can Tx!

                                              ;)

Offline Charlie_Dont_Surf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 841
  • Charlie's Point, California
    • View Profile
Re: Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II
« Reply #13 on: July 08, 2022, 0243 UTC »
You seem bent on using old inefficient technology at every step.

I'll leave you to it bud.

Another suggestion (I really don't know why I bother!)


Why not run class E, way more efficient and will consume far less current for same O/P.

Gave you loads of advice as have others but you seem stuck in the past with a design from the 1950's


Not satisfied with rubbing people the wrong way on another forum with a similar line of criticisms, you have to continue to do it here too. (Shaking my head.) I actually happen to agree with you in your general thrust on that other board about using obsolete transistors and boat-anchor-style construction techniques but I would not have conducted myself in the same manner.
I don't STRETCH the truth.

cdsurf attt protonmail d0t com

Offline Pigmeat

  • Marconi Class DXer
  • ********
  • Posts: 6684
    • View Profile
Re: Hellschreiber Beacon Mk II
« Reply #14 on: July 08, 2022, 0541 UTC »
Stretchy is from the UK. The Sun, the thing that powers solar panels, is just a rumor over there in Cloud Land. Being an island nation they prefer windmills. They're building a huge array of them on Guernsey. I hope the cows and sheep aren't lifted off to France by the vortex.

 

HFUnderground T-Shirt
HFUnderground Garden Flag
by MitchellTimeDesigns