A 'false moral equivalance' is what he is proposing there. Sorry, but that's not the way it is.
One side in this war has a history of witch hunts, endless propoganda campaigns, exposing people's personal information on the internet, attempting to reveal the location of 'enemy' operators, and using multiiple sock-puppets to gang up on anyone voicing any dissent and trying to shut them up, wear them out or chase them away.
And it goes further than that.
My email box is becoming full of the stories of people who have been persecuted by one 'side' in this war, going back years.... on a particular site and off of it... harassment campaigns conducted by Email... and people thanking me for standing up to the sockpuppets and trying to shut them up, because they fear "being banned" if they post, or having their personal information leaked, because its been done before.
Some of those who scream the loudest about 'cowards who make their attacks while hiding behind the internet' now appear to be the most guilty of that, and to a sickening degree which I never imagined possible.
So no, I can't agree that "one side is no better than the other."