We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Antennae

Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 44
406
General Radio Discussion / SDR direction finding
« on: June 09, 2014, 0418 UTC »
Say I have an hour's worth of SDR recording from an SDR receiver with dual channel input (2 receiving antennas). 
Can I find the direction of all the transmissions that are within the spectrum of that hour that I recorded? 

407
1649utc
I have a carrier (a tone on usb and lsb) and its on 15052 or 15053
Thanks for the news.

408
The RF Workbench / Re: High Powered Pirates
« on: June 08, 2014, 1638 UTC »
I have a coworker that worked at a military radar station in Alaska. There was a fire alarm sounding inside and the door into the station was frozen shut. He went up to the roof and climbed in that way to find no fire.  While on the roof he felt the radiation and said it was tingly. I think he said it was in the megawatts range.  He is very quick and smart, weird, twitches, can't have children, and recently had his bladder removed. He thinks he's impotent from the radiation exposure. His thyroid had some problem after the exposure. 

409
The RF Workbench / Re: which type of crystal
« on: June 08, 2014, 1628 UTC »
UPDATE:
I got a ham license (hooray!) and tried the transmitter on air and it doesn't go across the street! It doesn't move the dial on my antenna tuner either. I used 2 different antennas. Full update is on the bottom of the article:
http://hfunderground.com/blog/?p=369

410
0801utc (1am local time)
I was listening for Atlantic 2000 and didn't have anything on 9485 or 6005.

411
0805 utc (1am local time) :P
9635 I had a carrier signal. And according to short-wave.info, Mali Bamako was the only station on at the time.


412
I hear a carrier. The noise gets louder when I tune to the frequency.  And on USB I heard some definite station sounds.

413
0222 utc
Wolverine ID

Noise is high but undetectable fading.  Sun is highish at 724pm local time.  
SINPO
25242 with sky loop and tuner

0231 utc
SINPO
15353 with helical vertical indoors and tuner (I tuned it so the noise went away)


Thanks Wolverine!

0300ish
SSTV with loop and tuner because the propagation improved and this was the best reception
It look like colors was the theme. Red red wine.

414
Sounds like a cool station I'll start listening for it.

415
Equipment / Re: HF Receiving Antenna Myths
« on: June 07, 2014, 1709 UTC »
2 weeks ago I was messing around with my new adjustable inverted V. I have 5' of bare wire on each end so I can roll them up to shorten or unroll to lengthen the dipole.  I checked the resonance with a noise bridge.  At the longest dipole length, it was resonant to 6.4xx mHz.  At the shortest length it was resonant to 7.470ish and there was an American radio station nearby just barely legible. (so I figure this is as good as the antenna should get theoretically) It was 4pm in the afternoon and sun was high.  I went and checked my horizontal loop (about 97' in diameter) and the reception was the same.   Later at night on the loop the reception came in way better as the sun went down. But I couldn't compare to the inverted V because I took it down. I used my portable receiver on both antennas. It was a case of propagation. 

Nella F. is a forum member and believer in propagation as the main factor in receiving a signal.

This morning I put a tuner on my loop.  My loop connects to a 75ohm coax cable with no balun and comes inside the house.  I found a carrier signal on 6930usb (a slight tone above the noise) and I was able to tune to get better signal and reception than when bypassing the tuner (by about 10-20 percent). So I'm stoked for tonight, hopefully there will be some pirates to listen to and tune up.   

416
Equipment / Re: Inverted V on steep hillside
« on: June 07, 2014, 1609 UTC »
Chris, I had a 1/4 wave vertical with 4 radials 6 feet off the ground about 150' from the nearest house. It didn't pick up the noise from my house that I usually hear with my loop right next to my house. It was cut for 43meters and had no tuner. I connected my portable to its contacts with alligator clips. This is when there were some storms in the South (as I recall) in mid Feb. 2014. 
When I was only hooked up to the radials, I would hear the noise from the storms.  When I was only hooked up to the vertical wire, I didn't hear them so much.  When I was hooked up to both the wires sometimes I couldn't tell a difference. But sometimes both made the reception better.  This is storm noise I'm talking about receiving and I don't know if its polarized or not, its just my observations.

Without a tuner it was about as good as my loop that doesn't have a tuner.  I didn't compare it with the loop that much as the wires broke.

417
Equipment / Re: Tips on broomstick receiving antenna
« on: June 07, 2014, 1554 UTC »
I got a tuner. And it did make a difference on the strong 15.000mHz Universal Time station.  But nothing too fancy.
I was going to make a longer antenna with half the wire but when I took off my wire it was all curly and turned into some ungodly knots like out of a cartoon.  I threw the wire away.

$15 for something that works sounds worth the money!

418
I can't find the article, but some contractor for the US made a drone that can selectively destroy things in a city with EMP.  That way it won't get hospitals and other stuff. 
As seen on TV:
"Make it nice with an EMP device."

419
General Radio Discussion / Chinese RF interfering electronics
« on: June 06, 2014, 0313 UTC »
I have an idea regarding RF interfering TVs and power supplies and electronics. 
I assume the Chinese govt. pays for the China Radio International radio show. What if those listeners with radio interference wrote to CRI complaining about the interference and blame it on electronics from China? Maybe China's govt. would crack down on devices leaving their country so we can hear the beloved CRI show more clearly? 

420
Huh? / Re: A colaboration of software giants
« on: June 03, 2014, 0326 UTC »
The List is real?
The sad thing is its true, but for the purpose of tailoring ads to me so they can milk me, the consumer, for my money.  We're just cows.
On the paranoid side, I am comforted by fact that I have my computer's camera physically covered so they can't spy on me  ::)


Pages: 1 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [28] 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 44