301
North American Shortwave Pirate / Re: Pesques vs. Pirates 6925.5 USB
« on: June 15, 2010, 1719 UTC »
in all that mess of "AUDIO"was a lot of stuff including "MEXICAN" RAP the "MEXICAN" National Anthem was buried in there too!!
Shortwave Pirate Radio In North America And Around The World, And Other Signals That Go Bump In The Night
We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations.
Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
302
North American Shortwave Pirate / Re: Pesques vs. Pirates 6925.5 USB
« on: June 15, 2010, 0539 UTC »
LOL !!!
303
General Radio Discussion / .Your Dog Could Be a Tax Write-Off
« on: June 15, 2010, 0050 UTC »
http://dogs.about.com/b/2009/09/26/your-dog-could-be-a-tax-write-off.htm?r=outbrain
Imagine if your pet care expenses were tax deductible. I would wager that most pet owners have thought about it before - I do every year. After all, we can deduct our own health care expenses and many of our purchases, so why not our pets? Soon, tax-deductible pets could become a reality if a proposed bill passes.
Enter H.R. 3501: the Humanity and Pets Partnered Through the Years (HAPPY) Act, introduced by U.S. Representative Thaddeus McCotter. The proposed legislation would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow taxpayers to deduct up to $3,500 per year for the expenses of legally owned pets. Best of all, it includes veterinary expenses.
According to the proposal, there are two major factors to justify the bill. First, the 2007-2008 National Pet Owners Survey states that 63 percent of US households own a pet. In addition, they acknowledge the positive impact that the human-animal bond has upon people's well-being, both emotional and physical. If passed, the legislation would be effective beginning in the tax year 2010.
To me, this is utterly amazing and, quite frankly, a bit shocking. We all know the high cost of dog ownership and that every little bit helps. This bill could bring a whole new light to saving money on our pets' expenses. Do you want to show your support for this bill and help it get passed? With the help of the ASPCA, write to your U.S. representative and ask him or her to support and cosponsor the HAPPY Act.
Now we want to hear from you. What are your thoughts on this bill? Is there a downside, or is this simply a dream come true? Tell us what you think.
Imagine if your pet care expenses were tax deductible. I would wager that most pet owners have thought about it before - I do every year. After all, we can deduct our own health care expenses and many of our purchases, so why not our pets? Soon, tax-deductible pets could become a reality if a proposed bill passes.
Enter H.R. 3501: the Humanity and Pets Partnered Through the Years (HAPPY) Act, introduced by U.S. Representative Thaddeus McCotter. The proposed legislation would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow taxpayers to deduct up to $3,500 per year for the expenses of legally owned pets. Best of all, it includes veterinary expenses.
According to the proposal, there are two major factors to justify the bill. First, the 2007-2008 National Pet Owners Survey states that 63 percent of US households own a pet. In addition, they acknowledge the positive impact that the human-animal bond has upon people's well-being, both emotional and physical. If passed, the legislation would be effective beginning in the tax year 2010.
To me, this is utterly amazing and, quite frankly, a bit shocking. We all know the high cost of dog ownership and that every little bit helps. This bill could bring a whole new light to saving money on our pets' expenses. Do you want to show your support for this bill and help it get passed? With the help of the ASPCA, write to your U.S. representative and ask him or her to support and cosponsor the HAPPY Act.
Now we want to hear from you. What are your thoughts on this bill? Is there a downside, or is this simply a dream come true? Tell us what you think.
304
Spy Numbers / Re: High Frequency Global Communications System
« on: June 11, 2010, 0545 UTC »
4724 Aeronautical Off Route Frequency US Air Force Worldwide USB Global HF System Primary ---- 8992 Aeronautical Off Route Frequency US Air Force Worldwide USB Global HF System Primary ------ 11175 Aeronautical Off Route Frequency US Air Force Worldwide USB Global HF System Primary ------13200 Aeronautical Off Route Frequency US Air Force Worldwide USB Global HF System Primary ----- 15016 Aeronautical Off Route Frequency US Air Force Worldwide USB Global HF System Primary ------ are you sure your 6799 isn't 6800 instead ?? ----- 6800 HF SHARES Network US Government Nationwide USB/ALE there are a lot more freqs that you will hear these kind of broadcasts on years ago i had heard them in the 25-26 mhz range strange stuff indeed im still looking to see if i have anymore audio files left i had 40-50 before the computer crashed some did not survive and a lot got deleted by the guy who built this computer around my harddrives if i find more i will post them OutHouse Radio
305
Spy Numbers / Re: High Frequency Global Communications System
« on: June 11, 2010, 0456 UTC »
chews here gum like a Hefer <<<<<<<<<< LOL Good One !!! OK GUYS here is one from 6739 Aeronautical Off Route Frequency US Air Force Worldwide USB Global HF System Primary I can't remember how long ago this was but it is a very good recording with a FEMALE operator http://www.mediafire.com/?dwvigj5yydm
306
Spy Numbers / Re: High Frequency Global Communications System
« on: June 09, 2010, 2336 UTC »
OK here it is again someone needs to save this i will more than likely delete it again http://www.mediafire.com/?hqx3ymmjkhw
307
Spy Numbers / Re: High Frequency Global Communications System
« on: June 09, 2010, 2233 UTC »
OOOPS I accidently deleted that recording from media fire i will look for it in my audio files when i find it i will repost it you may want to save it as i clear my stuff off of mediafire often
308
North American Shortwave Pirate / Re: WEAK RADIO 6925 AM
« on: June 08, 2010, 2138 UTC »
21:34 sounds like another am carrier mixing in with WEAK playing BILBO BAGGINS 22:02 Lightening Hopkins DIRTY DOZENS LOL 22:22 WHOREHOUSE BLUES Motorhead 
22:29 911 blues R&B Bombers Thanks for playing it WEAK LOUIE LOUIE +60 I have to leave now WEAK "Fantastic" signal today
22:29 911 blues R&B Bombers Thanks for playing it WEAK LOUIE LOUIE +60 I have to leave now WEAK "Fantastic" signal today
309
North American Shortwave Pirate / WEAK RADIO 6925 AM
« on: June 08, 2010, 1956 UTC »
HUGE SIGNAL 19:57 peaks of +40 great audio really clear short fast fade at times OP says by email >> 45 watt carrier and maybe 80 or so peaks <<< " Skynyrd " FUNNY COMMERCIALS !! 20:26 +50 one more and your're off the scale Thanks for the SKYNYRD just what the DR. ordered to go with the Whiskey A little audio from earlier BEFORE you BROKE MY METER 21:04 still going strong ID at 21:12 signal has dropped s5-7 with static but still some strong peaks s9to +20 http://www.mediafire.com/?yyyyytlauyz
A little audio from earlier BEFORE you BROKE MY METER 21:04 still going strong ID at 21:12 signal has dropped s5-7 with static but still some strong peaks s9to +20 http://www.mediafire.com/?yyyyytlauyz
310
North American Shortwave Pirate / Re: 3910l
« on: June 06, 2010, 0548 UTC »
Fansome
Hero Member
I think that was Wolfman Jack, in the background, God rest his soul.
Quote from: outhouse radio on Today at 03:17
LMAO WOLF HOWLING
---------------------------------- I thought it was you AL!! 
Hero Member
I think that was Wolfman Jack, in the background, God rest his soul.
Quote from: outhouse radio on Today at 03:17
LMAO WOLF HOWLING
---------------------------------- I thought it was you AL!!
312
North American Shortwave Pirate / Re: 3910l
« on: June 06, 2010, 0307 UTC »
this guy has been on and off all evening He played "WIPE OUT" with some good audio too!!
313
Spy Numbers / Re: High Frequency Global Communications System
« on: June 03, 2010, 1653 UTC »
I don't remember the date or exact freq but i think it was 6850 not sure tho i like the slight ECHO effect i hear these stations all the time
314
General Radio Discussion / BROADCAST TRANSMITTER STOLEN WHILE ON THE AIR
« on: May 20, 2010, 1824 UTC »
Thieves nick transmitter while radio station is on the air
May 1 2010 Exclusive by Keith Mcleod
A RADIO station was silenced yesterday when its £50,000 transmitter was swiped.
The plug was pulled on Lanarkshire's L107 - which broadcasts to a potential audience of more than 600,000 - shortly after noon.
Mike Smith's Log In To Lunch show was being broadcast when the airwaves went dead.
The owners said the transmitter had been "unlawfully taken" from the 17th floor of an office block in Hamilton.
The blow came amid a bitter dispute between the new and former owners.
The station was taken over earlier this year after claims that former major shareholder Alan Shields had failed to pay creditors and DJs.
New boss John Prendergast, 31, bought out the shareholding of shock-jock Scottie McClue and offered cash guarantees to creditors and staff.
Yesterday, the new regime at the station gave a statement to police over the transmitter, said to be the size of a large fridge.
It was claimed that CCTV cameras from the office block - South Lanarkshire Council's County Buildings HQ in Almada Street - show two men pushing it out on a trolley and loading it into a van.
Last night, Prendergast said: "It would be like something out of the Keystone Kops, if it was not so serious.
"What we know is that two men got into the office building saying they were from L107 and gained access to the room where the transmitter was.
"Maintenance guys checked the roof of the County Buildings and found the antenna was still in place.
"But when they checked the transmitter room, they found it was gone.
"What the people responsible did not know though was that the council has recently installed a state-of-the art CCTV system."
A police spokeswoman said: "We have had a complaint regarding the theft of a radio station transmitter. Our officers have been at the scene and are investigating."
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/2010/05/01/thieves-nick-radio-transmitter-while-station-is-on-the-air-86908-22225555/
May 1 2010 Exclusive by Keith Mcleod
A RADIO station was silenced yesterday when its £50,000 transmitter was swiped.
The plug was pulled on Lanarkshire's L107 - which broadcasts to a potential audience of more than 600,000 - shortly after noon.
Mike Smith's Log In To Lunch show was being broadcast when the airwaves went dead.
The owners said the transmitter had been "unlawfully taken" from the 17th floor of an office block in Hamilton.
The blow came amid a bitter dispute between the new and former owners.
The station was taken over earlier this year after claims that former major shareholder Alan Shields had failed to pay creditors and DJs.
New boss John Prendergast, 31, bought out the shareholding of shock-jock Scottie McClue and offered cash guarantees to creditors and staff.
Yesterday, the new regime at the station gave a statement to police over the transmitter, said to be the size of a large fridge.
It was claimed that CCTV cameras from the office block - South Lanarkshire Council's County Buildings HQ in Almada Street - show two men pushing it out on a trolley and loading it into a van.
Last night, Prendergast said: "It would be like something out of the Keystone Kops, if it was not so serious.
"What we know is that two men got into the office building saying they were from L107 and gained access to the room where the transmitter was.
"Maintenance guys checked the roof of the County Buildings and found the antenna was still in place.
"But when they checked the transmitter room, they found it was gone.
"What the people responsible did not know though was that the council has recently installed a state-of-the art CCTV system."
A police spokeswoman said: "We have had a complaint regarding the theft of a radio station transmitter. Our officers have been at the scene and are investigating."
http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/2010/05/01/thieves-nick-radio-transmitter-while-station-is-on-the-air-86908-22225555/
315
General Radio Discussion / right to swear
« on: May 19, 2010, 0331 UTC »
U.S. rights group sues to protect right to swear (Reuters) - An American rights group is suing the police in Pennsylvania for issuing tickets, which carry a jail sentence, to people for swearing.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64D3D820100514?feedType=RSS&feedName=oddlyEnoughNews&rpc=69
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which filed the lawsuits earlier, argues that the right to use profanity is protected by the U.S. Constitution.
"Unfortunately, many police departments in the commonwealth do not seem to be getting the message that swearing is not a crime," said Marieke Tuthill of the ACLU of Pennsylvania. "The courts have repeatedly found that profanity, unlike obscenity, is protected speech."
Obscenity, under the Supreme Court's definition, refers to speech that mainly appeals to the "prurient interest" in sex, according to the ACLU.
One lawsuit involves an unidentified woman in Luzerne County in northeast Pennsylvania who was given a citation which carries a maximum penalty of $300 and 90 days in jail after she yelled an offensive word at a motorcyclist who swerved close to her in October 2008.
In a separate case a man was arrested, cited for disorderly conduct and briefly jailed after shouting a double expletive at a policeman who was writing him a parking ticket.
The two are among at least 750 people in Pennsylvania a year who face illegal disorderly conduct charges because of the use of profanity in Pennsylvania, the ACLU said.
Citations for swearing have also been handed out in other states including Michigan and New York, according to the ACLU, which said it has successfully defended about a dozen people in profanity prosecutions.
But the group added that there are more citations given out in Pennsylvania than other states.
"Cops don't understand that there's a legal definition of obscenity and therefore issue citations for profanity," said Sara Mullen, a spokeswoman for the ACLU.
Tuthill added that the ACLU will continue to bring lawsuits until the practice of issuing citations for swearing is stopped.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE64D3D820100514?feedType=RSS&feedName=oddlyEnoughNews&rpc=69
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which filed the lawsuits earlier, argues that the right to use profanity is protected by the U.S. Constitution.
"Unfortunately, many police departments in the commonwealth do not seem to be getting the message that swearing is not a crime," said Marieke Tuthill of the ACLU of Pennsylvania. "The courts have repeatedly found that profanity, unlike obscenity, is protected speech."
Obscenity, under the Supreme Court's definition, refers to speech that mainly appeals to the "prurient interest" in sex, according to the ACLU.
One lawsuit involves an unidentified woman in Luzerne County in northeast Pennsylvania who was given a citation which carries a maximum penalty of $300 and 90 days in jail after she yelled an offensive word at a motorcyclist who swerved close to her in October 2008.
In a separate case a man was arrested, cited for disorderly conduct and briefly jailed after shouting a double expletive at a policeman who was writing him a parking ticket.
The two are among at least 750 people in Pennsylvania a year who face illegal disorderly conduct charges because of the use of profanity in Pennsylvania, the ACLU said.
Citations for swearing have also been handed out in other states including Michigan and New York, according to the ACLU, which said it has successfully defended about a dozen people in profanity prosecutions.
But the group added that there are more citations given out in Pennsylvania than other states.
"Cops don't understand that there's a legal definition of obscenity and therefore issue citations for profanity," said Sara Mullen, a spokeswoman for the ACLU.
Tuthill added that the ACLU will continue to bring lawsuits until the practice of issuing citations for swearing is stopped.