We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - NJQA

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 22
91
Equipment / Re: LOG Not Performing Well
« on: September 10, 2021, 1438 UTC »
I suspect multiconductor wire will have odd capacitance effects and other undesireables as with using cat cable as an antenna - the pairs are specifically twisted so as not to interfere with each other signalwise.

The twisted wires depend on current flowing in equal but opposite directions in the wire pairs to achieve cancellation of radiated energy.  For external induced EMI, the twisting ensures external fields induce equivalent voltages in both wires so that the induced energy can be negated by differential signaling.

Connecting all of the conductors together at each end negates these effects.  It just becomes a lot of wires in parallel.

92
Equipment / Re: LOG Not Performing Well
« on: September 10, 2021, 1410 UTC »
I have posted this link before.  This gives the background on why buried Log or Bog antennas don’t perform well.  Figure 39 is worth looking at:

https://rudys.typepad.com/files/qexjul-aug-2016-bog.pdf

This should be no surprise if you think about the difference in performance of buried vs elevated radials on a vertical antenna.  Verticals only need a few radials if the radials are elevated above ground, but they do need to be the right length.  Buried radials require many of them to achieve similar performance but the specific length of them tends to be less critical as ground losses become more dominant.

A few years ago I put up (down?) a 1000 ft BoG for the winter DX season.  I used a roll of cheap outside rated CAT5 UTP cable I bought off of Amazon.  This  cable was 24 ga copper clad aluminum (CCA) wire.  I twisted all the wires together at each end and fed it with a 9:1 (I think) balun.   The resistance of each of the individual wires was about 75 ohms, so it was probably about 9 ohms for the entire length of the antenna.  An external preamp was not used.

I was pleased with how well it worked for LW NDB DXing.  Part way through the season performance seemed to drop off a little, but I attributed that to conditions.  I was still hearing many new stations.

When I rolled it up in the Spring I found that I actually had 4 pieces of wire.  Some time during the Winter a rabbit or squirrel had chewed through the wire at multiple spots.  My LoG had become a large OCF-dipole-on-the-ground!

One of my original reasons for measuring the wire resistance had been for future troubleshooting, but during the course of the season I never rechecked it.  If I had it would have become obvious that the wire had been severed.

I will probably install another LoG this Fall.  I may use copper wire this time but I really don’t expect a noticeable difference over CCA.  Receive antenna currents are extremely small and (I squared R) losses aren’t very large.  People build Beverage antennas using aluminum or Copperweld fence wire all the time.  W8JI had some comments on wire types for Beverage antennas, but he said the biggest reasons to choose one over the other were largely focused on how well the wire survived environmental conditions and how difficult it was to work with.

http://www.w8ji.com/beverages.htm

There is probably a sweet spot regarding the minimum length of a LoG.  Too little wire won’t capture enough signal.  KK5JY suggests 15% of the target wavelength.

http://www.kk5jy.net/LoG/

My tests this Winter may use a roll of Home Depot THNN copper house wire (about 500 ft) instead of the 1000 ft CAT5 UTP as I want to see if this length will be useful at LF.





93
Equipment / Re: LOG Not Performing Well
« on: September 09, 2021, 1343 UTC »
I don’t think you want to remove the insulation from the wire on a LoG antenna.

Although this isn’t the case for you since you just installed your LoG, both LoG and BoG antennas suffer performance degradation if they get subsumed into the ground.  These antennas need to be sitting *on* on the ground, not under it, even a little bit.


94
Equipment / Re: Long Wire RX Antenna - How Long is Too Long?
« on: August 24, 2021, 1819 UTC »
One other item to consider is your antenna switch and coax.  If the isolation is not so good, you can have significant signal leakage between the antennas you are running your A-B tests on.  This can make the poorer antenna seem to perform better than it actually does.

95
Equipment / Re: AnyTone AT-D578UVIIIPRO Tri-Band transceiver
« on: August 24, 2021, 1202 UTC »
The 578 was reviewed in the June 2020 issue of QST.  There wasn’t anything remarkable in terms of problems with the radio.  The worst comment I saw was that the sensitivity on 220 was slightly worse than on the other bands (it was .31 uV).  That is not surprising as 220 was probably an add on.

Several of the locals here have this radio.  I have heard no complaints.  Apparently there are different firmware loads available.  The ham version adds 220 MHz.  The commercial version gives you a FCC compliant radio for business purposes.

You also have to pay close attention to the model number of the radio you are buying.  Different models of this radio had different features.  I saw one version recently that included aviation band receive (including an AM decoder).  Other versions did not include GPS.  Pay close attention - if the price seems too good, then you might not actually be buying the model you think you are.

All of the major dealers sell the 578 (HRO, R&L, etc) and there doesn’t seem to be any difference in price.  One dealer includes access to training videos if you buy from him, but I seem to remember that he charges for shipping, so your best deal might be elsewhere.

This is a DMR digital radio, which also has analog FM.  That is why it costs what it does.  The radio is small and the display is small. 


96
Equipment / Re: KiwiSDR backdoor
« on: July 16, 2021, 1305 UTC »
Check to see that your KiwiSDR is updated to V1.461.

www.kiwisdr.com

98
Maybe a clue is in his tag line “….trusty rusty 1980s portable with about 140 feet of wire thrown up in the trees…..”. That is a lot of antenna for most portable radios.  It is possible that his portable radio is overloaded and generating this signal internally.

99
I don’t know that I buy into this “sub-harmonic” idea.  Mixing products seem more likely.

If you are actually hearing WBBR 1130, mixing products from a station on 680 kHz (or 1580 kHz) could produce a signal on 450 kHz…but I would expect to hear audio from both stations.  You didn’t report that.

Also, does WRCA 1330 Boston carry Bloomberg?  They are closer to you than NYC.

If you were tuned to 450 kHz, and your radio had a 455 kHz IF, the local oscillator would be at 905 kHz.  If WRCA 1330 also mixed with the 905 kHz local oscillator, then the product would be at 405 kHz which is near to the frequency you were hearing this unknown signal.


100
Many of the Retevis products are available on Amazon (though the RT27 is not as cheap as the factory is selling it). I have found that almost all of the Retevis radios have programming software available, though sometimes I have to email them to get it.

101
22 Meter Band HiFER Beacons / NHVT
« on: July 04, 2021, 1414 UTC »
Heard 1413Z on 13558.9.  Weak and fading.   First time heard here.

102
Equipment / 630M Loop on the Ground (LoG) antenna
« on: May 23, 2021, 1255 UTC »
Detailed analysis and report on a 630M Loop on the Ground Antenna.

https://rudys.typepad.com/files/630m-log-notes.pdf

103
Equipment / Re: Lab599 Discovery TX-500? Yeah, I want one!
« on: May 18, 2021, 1131 UTC »
I don’t know; he hasn’t posted anything yet.  He briefly showed it during the last club meeting (a VTC in lieu of an in person meeting).  I agree, it looks very interesting and I want to know more too.

104
Amateur Radio / Re: Listing of Eastern Hamfests 2021.
« on: May 18, 2021, 0109 UTC »
I’ve always found Berryville to be worth the trip.  Hot, yes (it is August after all), but the tailgate area was well shaded and the BBQ was good.  Really pleasant drive down there.   Last time I was there I saw some rare SW receiver boatanchors.  Berryville is one of my favorites.

Manassas used to be really good but fell out of favor in past years.   It was usually hot too and the tailgate area was out in the Sun - but that was at the PW County fairgrounds and the fairgrounds have been sold.  The hamfest is now at a different location in the city of Manassas.  I expected it to be poor when I attended the 2019 hamfest but was pleasantly surprised.  The new venue was not bad at all.  It even had good shade for the tailgate area.

Remember when the big hamfest in the DC area was Gaithersburg, MD?  It was huge and was two days long.  Timonium, MD was another big one.  Both are gone.  The others will disappear too if people don’t go.

105
Equipment / Re: Lab599 Discovery TX-500? Yeah, I want one!
« on: May 17, 2021, 1217 UTC »
Ham Radio Outlet is shipping them.  One of the local hams has one, got it last week.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ... 22