We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Author Topic: FCC Commissioner Questions Enforcement Actions (Radio World)  (Read 3344 times)

Offline John Poet

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 917
  • Lansing, Michigan, USA
  • I survived the Mad Lagomurph
    • View Profile
    • Free Radio Cafe forums
    • Email
FCC Commissioner Questions Enforcement Actions (Radio World)
« on: December 10, 2015, 0247 UTC »
Remarks made last week by FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai will likely fuel concern among broadcast industry observers {i.e. whores ~ J.Poet} who doubt the Federal Communication Commission’s commitment to enforcement.

In his address to the PLI/FCBA 33rd Annual Institute on Telecommunications Policy and Regulation in Washington, Commissioner Pai acknowledged the trend of fewer FCC enforcement actions and specifically mentioned the lack of attention given to pirate radio complaints.

The FCC commissioner said an email he obtained from an unidentified whistleblower within the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau dated Oct. 28, 2014, included the following instructions from the bureau’s Northeast Regional Director to field agents: “We are scaling back our response to pirate operations. Barring interference to a safety service, pirates should not be given a high priority. If there’s interference to a safety service, it’s not a pirate case but instead a safety case.”

The email went on to state “we will not be issuing NALs [Notice of Apparent Liability] to the majority of pirate operators,” according to Commissioner Pai.

Industry observers have told Radio World the FCC’s pending field office closings and staff cutbacks will further erode the FCC’s enforcement abilities.

“My prediction is that we’ll continue to see a less effective enforcement process and fewer enforcement actions,” Pai said.

http://www.radioworld.com/article/fcc-c ... ons/277676

And may your prediction come true! ~John Poet

John Poet

"A treasonous voice of dissent"

The Crystal Ship Shortwave
Free Radio Cafe Forums

Offline John Poet

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 917
  • Lansing, Michigan, USA
  • I survived the Mad Lagomurph
    • View Profile
    • Free Radio Cafe forums
    • Email
Re: FCC Commissioner Questions Enforcement Actions (Radio World)
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2015, 0250 UTC »
Sounds like the NE Director has a healthy attitude about pirate enforcement-- unless there's a valid threat to health and safety, they have better things to do than chase pirates...

Some of these other field offices should follow their lead-- for the short time that they may continue to exist before many are eliminated...

John Poet

"A treasonous voice of dissent"

The Crystal Ship Shortwave
Free Radio Cafe Forums

Fansome

  • Guest
Re: FCC Commissioner Questions Enforcement Actions (Radio World)
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2015, 0324 UTC »
Was anything said that differentiated HF from FM enforcement efforts?

Offline Pigmeat

  • Marconi Class DXer
  • ********
  • Posts: 6684
    • View Profile
Re: FCC Commissioner Questions Enforcement Actions (Radio World)
« Reply #3 on: December 10, 2015, 1358 UTC »
They're only going to go after penguin-phobic pirates, Al. You have nothing.....uh...... maybe you should stay off the air.

Offline sat_dxer

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 2326
    • View Profile
Re: FCC Commissioner Questions Enforcement Actions (Radio World)
« Reply #4 on: December 10, 2015, 1613 UTC »
Enforcement disarray will now lead to the emergence of a more aggressive, anti pirate jammer.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2015, 2330 UTC by sat_dxer »
Most times & frequencies posted are only an approximation.

Offline Pigmeat

  • Marconi Class DXer
  • ********
  • Posts: 6684
    • View Profile
Re: FCC Commissioner Questions Enforcement Actions (Radio World)
« Reply #5 on: December 10, 2015, 2106 UTC »
There's nothing new about jammers. They've infested the pirate frequencies for years. They're just part of the game.

Offline redhat

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 1586
  • USA
  • Music is my drug.
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: FCC Commissioner Questions Enforcement Actions (Radio World)
« Reply #6 on: December 11, 2015, 0710 UTC »
Considering the number of AM's & FM's out there doing things that are blatantly illegal, I'd say they should have better things to do.

+-RH
Somewhere under the stars...
Airspy HF+, MLA-30/Mini-whip/Chi-Town Loop
Please send QSL's and reception reports to xfmshortwave [at] proton [d0t] me

Offline BDM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 566
  • S/E Michigan
    • View Profile
Re: FCC Commissioner Questions Enforcement Actions (Radio World)
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2015, 0124 UTC »
+1, agree with RH
Radios -- Perseus SDR // SDRPlay RSPdx // Icom IC-7300 // Tecsun PL-660 // Panasonic RF-5000A --Antennas-- Pixel Pro 1B loop - 82' fan-dipole at 40' - tuned MW/BCB 40" loop and 100' receive only dipole
-Brian--North of Detroit--MI-
1710/KHz the MW Pirate Clear Channel (not so much anymore "sigh")

Offline Rafman

  • DXing Phenomena
  • *******
  • Posts: 2584
  • Virgilina Border
  • Pirate Radio: Radio FUN minus Station Management!!
    • View Profile
    • WirelessDX - Collection of Pirate Radio clips by Rafman K4RAF
    • Email
Re: FCC Commissioner Questions Enforcement Actions (Radio World)
« Reply #8 on: December 13, 2015, 0722 UTC »
I consider this good news [for MF/HF, unless you are licensed & being encroached upon... or operate a business using Part 15 for links or service & get driven off...

I had an enjoyable conversation about this very recently...  ;)

Real Men of Radio ?
~
Rafman
Onion Flats [Baskerville] VA USA
[All QSLs greatly appreciated: WIFIDX@gmail.com]
Elad FDM-S1&S2 / SDRplay1 & SDRplay2
Mizuho SX59 & SX3 preselectors / JPS ANC4 Noise Phaser
41m EU beverage / 40m loop / 75m CF Zepp / 41m Sloping Dipole
The "Real FCC" http://bit.ly/2lQDNYm