We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Author Topic: F.C.C. Likely to Open Airwaves to Wireless  (Read 1727 times)

Fansome

  • Guest
F.C.C. Likely to Open Airwaves to Wireless
« on: September 13, 2010, 1137 UTC »
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/technology/13wifi.html?_r=1&hp

September 12, 2010
F.C.C. Likely to Open Airwaves to Wireless
By EDWARD WYATT

WASHINGTON — When the Federal Communications Commission first approved the use of unlicensed bands of the airwaves decades ago, it began a revolution in consumer electronics — first in television remote controls and garage door openers, then in baby monitors and cordless phones, and most recently in wireless computer networks.

This month, the F.C.C. is likely to approve what could be an even bigger expansion of the unlicensed airwaves, opening the door to supercharged Wi-Fi networks that will do away with the need to find a wireless hot spot and will provide the scaffolding for new applications that are not yet imagined.

“We know what the first kind of deployments will be,” Julius Genachowski, the chairman of the F.C.C., said in an interview, citing wireless broadband networks that can cover entire university or corporate campuses, for example — what is referred to in the industry as “Wi-Fi on steroids.”

The stronger, faster networks will extend broadband signals to bypassed rural areas and allow for smart electric grids, remote health monitoring and, for consumers, wireless Internet without those annoying dead zones.

“But this will also be a platform for innovators and entrepreneurs,” Mr. Genachowski said. “There is every chance of this leading to the development of one or more billion-dollar industries.”

Just as broadband-ready smartphones could hardly be imagined in 1938, when the F.C.C. first approved the use of unlicensed radio waves, or even in 1985, when it issued the rules that led to Wi-Fi, the eventual consumer products that will use the new airwaves are all but unknown.

“I’m absolutely confident that there will be a huge range of applications that we cannot yet predict,” said Dan Reed, corporate vice president for technology policy and strategy at Microsoft, which, alongside Google and Dell, has pushed hard for the F.C.C. to approve the new rules.

Anyone who has wandered through a hotel conference center waving a laptop and hoping for a signal knows that wireless broadband connections have their limitations.

The expanded access to airwaves offers a solution. The unused bands of spectrum were generated by the conversion of television signals from analog to digital. Because digital transmission uses a smaller slice of spectrum, more “white space” was freed up around each broadcast signal. It is those white spaces that the F.C.C. is now seeking to put to use.

The new airwaves are particularly attractive because television signals are low-frequency waves, meaning they can travel farther, go more easily through walls, trees and other obstructions, and provide more reliable connections.

As with any developing technology, uncertainties remain. Urban areas, which have the most demand for the new airwaves, have less of them available because more local television stations are using available bands. Also, by making the airwaves available free, the F.C.C. is bypassing the possibility of using them to generate revenue, either through auctions or user fees.

The F.C.C. is virtually certain to approve the new rules at its Sept. 23 meeting, because it already has approved a similar set of rules, in November 2008. Those rules have never been in effect, however, because both supporters and opponents of the concept objected to some of the details.

Supporters challenged the F.C.C.’s decision to require new devices to include a feature that conducts an electronic search for airwaves that are not occupied, as well as to rely on a database of unused airwaves in choosing a frequency on which to transmit its signal. That belt-and-suspenders approach would have made devices more expensive because of the complicated engineering required.

The use of the white spaces was more generally opposed by a coalition of industries that included broadcasters, who feared that the new signals would interfere with their transmissions, and theater owners, sports arenas and churches, which make extensive use of wireless microphones that they, too, feared would be subject to interference.

Exactly how the F.C.C. has addressed those objections will not be known until the new rules are released at the Sept. 23 meeting. But people in the telecommunications industry who keep close tabs on the agency say they expect that the searching requirement will be abandoned, and that wireless microphones will be given certain transmission priorities.

Wireless networks that use the white-space signals are already being tested in several locations. Microsoft uses the signals in a wireless network that stretches over its corporate campus in Redmond, Wash.

The city of Wilmington, N.C., and the surrounding New Hanover County has a trial network used by several government entities. The transportation department connects wirelessly to remote cameras that help it monitor traffic congestion. The parks department similarly monitors remote wetland areas and uses the signals to transmit environmental data that is required by federal regulators — saving the cost of sending an employee to scattered locations.

Some new devices undoubtedly will serve health care applications, allowing hospitals to move equipment easily without rewiring or allowing them to monitor patients in remote settings. And so-called smart grids — systems that allow a power company to track consumption and generation more closely or to control appliances from a central location — are also likely.

Blair Levin, a fellow at the Aspen Institute and a former F.C.C. official, said that although there was no guarantee that the new airwaves would produce the technological gold rush that some supporters have expected, “anything that is put to use that is now lying fallow is good for the economy.”

The fact that new applications can use unlicensed airwaves is important as an economic development tool, said Rebecca Arbogast, a managing director and telecommunications analyst at Stifel Nicolaus. Few companies have the billions of dollars required to buy spectrum that is periodically auctioned off by the F.C.C., she said, but unlicensed spectrum can attract cash-poor, start-up companies.

The deployment of television-band white spaces represents a rarely used model for the F.C.C., which historically has operated under more of a command-and-control model, in which it tells licensees what they can use their spectrum for.

“The last time we did this, no one knew what would happen,” Mr. Genachowski said. But the result — wireless computer networking and other consumer applications — has transformed the economy.

While issues of interference and other conflicts inevitably will arise and will be have to be addressed by the commission, he said, “we are confident that the benefits of moving forward are so significant that we should act now.”

Offline SW-J

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 544
  • Dallas, Texas
    • View Profile
Re: F.C.C. Likely to Open Airwaves to Wireless
« Reply #1 on: September 13, 2010, 1434 UTC »
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/13/technology/13wifi.html?_r=1&hp

« on: Today at 11:37 »   Quote


The stronger, faster networks will extend broadband signals to bypassed rural areas and allow for smart electric grids,



Bzzzzt!

Epic fail; the day that the local distribution network is completely computerized is also the day androids will be driving the electric utility trucks ... one thing I learned in the five local power outages we had is - the guys arriving on the scene for the 'service call' will "drive the line" looking for a downed wire or a tree against the line or maybe a poor CBer whose mast has fallen onto the primary distribution line (it has happened!!!) ... how's a so-called "Smart Grid" going to do that? Ans: they aren't ...

Power substations already have 're-closers' that will attempt to restore power several times before finally giving up (ever notice how your lights after going out sometimes will come back on a couple times before finally staying off or staying on?) so this 'smart grid' is just more fanciful sales and marketing to the public so's the public will know what their utility dollar is  being spent on ... but it won't improve service or your life; just eases the power co's ability to do a remote cut-off if you don't pay your bill ...


o Icom IC-756ProII, ProIII, Alinco DX-70, Kenwood TS-680s
o WinRadio G303e, Degen/Kaito 1103/DE1103, Stoddart NM-25
o 1/2 wave 80m Dipole used with several tuners
o Tuned loops from 2' thru 16' diam. capable of 160m thru 10m

Offline syfr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 687
    • View Profile
Re: F.C.C. Likely to Open Airwaves to Wireless
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2010, 0009 UTC »
"wireless computer networking and other consumer applications — has transformed the economy."

So THAT'S what did it!

Kiwsdr x 2. TenTec Paragon/NRD535

Offline SW-J

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 544
  • Dallas, Texas
    • View Profile
Re: F.C.C. Likely to Open Airwaves to Wireless
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2010, 0109 UTC »

Quote
The deployment of television-band white spaces represents a rarely used model for the F.C.C., which historically has operated under more of a command-and-control model, in which it tells licensees what they can use their spectrum for.

A potential minefield; bad enough the digital TV signals break up, freeze, are unusable where they used to be usable, but now the potential for a STRONG emitter the next channel over can cause adjacent channel overload problems with a plethora of near-fringe-area receivers ...

GREAT! 

Maybe this will help with the demise of terrestrial broadcast TV (and the networks! Broadcast TV already suffers from lack of content anyway) ...

o Icom IC-756ProII, ProIII, Alinco DX-70, Kenwood TS-680s
o WinRadio G303e, Degen/Kaito 1103/DE1103, Stoddart NM-25
o 1/2 wave 80m Dipole used with several tuners
o Tuned loops from 2' thru 16' diam. capable of 160m thru 10m

cmradio

  • Guest
Re: F.C.C. Likely to Open Airwaves to Wireless
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2010, 0921 UTC »
The bigger the mess this becomes, the higher the likelyhood the CRTC will say, "Let's do this too!" :o >:( :-[ ::)

Peace!

Offline syfr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 687
    • View Profile
Re: F.C.C. Likely to Open Airwaves to Wireless
« Reply #5 on: September 14, 2010, 1036 UTC »
1001 channels and nothing to watch....
Kiwsdr x 2. TenTec Paragon/NRD535