We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Author Topic: Investigation by ARRL OOs, Researchers Leads to Resolution of 60 Meter Interfere  (Read 2337 times)

Offline ChrisSmolinski

  • Administrator
  • Marconi Class DXer
  • *****
  • Posts: 31697
  • Westminster, MD USA
    • View Profile
    • Black Cat Systems
08/03/2011
Collaboration between ARRL Official Observers and researchers at Rutgers University has resulted in a change of operating frequency of coastal HF radars, eliminating interference to amateur stations using two frequencies in the 60 meter (5 MHz) band.

In July 2003, radio amateurs in the US received secondary privileges on 60 meters. Its strict guidelines -- no CW, operation just on five distinct channels using USB, a maximum effective radiated power of 50 W and only open to General, Advanced and Amateur Extra class licensees -- have prevented it from being popular. At first, amateurs interested in operating on 60 meters had to make modifications to the radios in use at the time. But now, more rigs are available that are designed to operate on 60 meters directly, or with a simple manipulation of menus.

Over time, radio amateurs heard various signals on the channels; users assumed these signals were those of government users and protected as such. Normally, advice to amateurs is to “use it or lose it” in regard to band usage, but on 60 meters, the watchword seemed to be “misuse” the band and lose it. So amateurs were cautious and compliant and when the band was made available to radio amateurs, users reported that everyone on the band was friendly and courteous, with at least one amateur reporting “that it was the way all the other bands used to be.”

But recently, with more users and people monitoring and using the band, amateurs began hearing more Coastal Ocean Dynamics Applications Radar (CODAR) signals on the channels. CODAR is a form of HF radar used by a number of institutions to research and study ocean currents and waves. Amateurs frequently reported CODAR sounds as that “repetitive loud swishing sound” on the band.

“After comparing reception reports of these signals that we had been hearing on the East Coast and reports he had received from amateurs on the West Coast, ARRL Orange Section Official Observer Coordinator Dan Welch W6DFW, followed up on them and began doing some research,” explained ARRL Field and Regulatory Correspondent Chuck Skolaut, K0BOG. “We alerted Official Observers -- especially along the coast -- to monitor and forward reports.”

Welch enlisted the assistance of a number of these Official Observers and other stations to monitor the frequencies after he had received more observations. Through good cooperation with the FCC, he was able to ascertain that CODAR was being used by Rutgers University on channels 3 and 4 in the 60 meter amateur band.

According to Skolaut, much of the follow-up included good cooperation from the CODAR group at Rutgers, including Josh Kohut and Ethan Handel. Rutgers is part of a regional partnership working on ocean observing. Kohut told the ARRL that information they gather is used by the Coast Guard, fisheries, off shore energy facilities, storm forecasters and pollution studies. He explained that the transmitters are capable of 40 W and provide information from up to 100 miles.

Welch and Handel coordinated testing, and amateurs were contacted to help monitor the frequencies as Handel shut down the various transmitters in their network to determine which ones amateurs were hearing. “They conducted two tests a week apart and it was definitely determined that the pulses being heard on the two channels were being transmitted from one or more of their sites,” Skolaut said. “It is interesting to note that the West Coast stations were able to hear the East Coast CODAR much of the time, depending on propagation. After consulting with Welch, the Rutgers team was able to move their transmitter frequencies outside of the amateur band to 4.9 MHz to continue their valuable ocean research. Both Handel and Kohut said that they were glad we were able to resolve this issue in a mutually beneficial way. Now once again, 60 meters is quiet with regard to CODAR signals.”

Skolaut encourages amateurs to check out the band and sample what those frequencies have to offer, taking into regard the various restrictions for its use: “While conducting the monitoring checks, we noted a number of relaxed QSOs taking place on the other 60 meter frequencies, including a number of UK stations coming in quite nicely here on the East Coast on channel 5. This is a common frequency available to amateurs in the United States and the UK. Sixty meters is a band that fills the gap between 40 and 75 meters on phone quite nicely at times. It may truly be the ‘hidden treasure’ of the amateur bands.”


http://www.arrl.org/news/investigation-by-arrl-oos-researchers-leads-to-resolution-of-60-meter-interference
Chris Smolinski
Westminster, MD
eQSLs appreciated! csmolinski@blackcatsystems.com
netSDR / AFE822x / AirSpy HF+ / KiwiSDR / 900 ft Horz skyloop / 500 ft NE beverage / 250 ft V Beam / 58 ft T2FD / 120 ft T2FD / 400 ft south beverage / 43m, 20m, 10m  dipoles / Crossed Parallel Loop / Discone in a tree

Online Andrew Yoder

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 2324
    • View Profile
    • Hobby Broadcasting Blog
    • Email
It's great to see the CODAR move out of 60m, but I didn't realize that some channels were available for ham use!
I wrote to Josh Kohut a few years ago to complain about CODAR interference to tropical band stations. Thought you might like to read his very nice and informative response:

Andrew,

     Thanks for your interest in the site.  We at Rutgers operate 4 systems
along the New Jersey coast, one site on Block Island, and another on
Nantucket Island.

A few years ago when we started operating these systems we had some
communication with several shortwave radio listeners who asked that we try
and avoid the 60-meter band.  At that time we had four sites all operating
at different frequencies between 4.4 and 5.2 MHz.  The shortwave listeners
that we spoke with had the same request as you, to stay below 4.8 MHz.  So
in our applications to the FCC we applied for frequencies below 4.8 MHz as
well as the 4.8 MHz band.  We kept the 4.8 MHz band in the license because
that is a frequency that the FCC has asked to use in the past.

Since that time CODAR Ocean Sensors (the manufacturer) has developed some
new hardware/software that allows us to operate many sites at the same
frequency, without any interference.  This is great for everyone because the
4 frequencies we were occupying for four sites reduced to one frequency.  It
uses GPS timing (pretty cool stuff).

Up until this past summer we were able to operate all of our four sites in
New Jersey at 4.55 MHz and the two sites in New England at 4.47 MHz (well
below 4.8), taking advantage of the GPS synchronization.  This changed when
the FCC instructed us to discontinue our use of the 4.47 band and switch to
another frequency.  Our only other choice in the license was the higher
frequencies (around 4.8 MHz).  So we had to move the sites in Block Island
and Nantucket to 4.8.

We are only one out of several groups around the US (including Gulf of
Maine, Gulf of Mexico, San Diego, Monterey Bay, and the Gulf of Alaska) who
are operating these systems.  I am not sure how many of these other sites
are operating with frequencies in the upper 4 MHz region.  The interference
in Texas could be from any of these stations (including us).

These stations are being used by a diverse user group including us (the
geeky scientists), the Coast Guard, NOAA Hazmat, local police, k-12
education.  Because of the large user base, these systems are beginning to
multiply along the coast.  With this large number of systems being deployed,
there is a need for us, as a community, to explore primary bands with the
FCC.  These bands would include frequencies that you suggest (4.4-4.7 MHz).
This way we can't be kicked off like we were last summer.  This is a long
process, we have to go beyond the FCC to the ICU for approval.

Our intention is certainly not to interfere with your transmissions.  We
have tried in the past and will continue to try to work with shortwave
listening community so that we can both operate without interference.  If
you have any more questions, please do not hesitate to ask.


Regards,

     Josh
Please QSL to: POB 109, BRS, PA 17214
Hobby Broadcasting Blog: http://hobbybroadcasting.blogspot.com/
Drake R8, AOR AR-7030, R-390A, R-388, SX-28A, Philco 44 + some others    Horizontal loops & 1/2-wave inverted V

Offline John Poet

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 924
  • Lansing, Michigan, USA
  • I survived the Mad Lagomurph
    • View Profile
    • Free Radio Cafe forums
    • Email
That must have been the thing mucking up 5385 so I couldn't use it last winter/spring.  Now its gone.


John Poet

"A treasonous voice of dissent"

The Crystal Ship Shortwave

Offline Pigmeat

  • Marconi Class DXer
  • ********
  • Posts: 6684
    • View Profile
Codar has been screwing up reception on 60 meter broadcast band for a decade. How long does it take them to move? It's the same with all the domestic broadcasters on 90 and 60 meters running religious cons. Someone needs to file a lawsuit against the FCC for issuing permits in violation of international law.

cmradio

  • Guest
I have yet to hear anything on 60M besides swishers and CFL bulbs :-\

Peace!

 

HFUnderground Mug
HFUnderground Mug
by MitchellTimeDesigns