We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissable in your locale.

Author Topic: Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation  (Read 1222 times)

Offline ChrisSmolinski

  • Administrator
  • Marconi Class DXer
  • *****
  • Posts: 23861
  • Westminster, MD USA
    • View Profile
    • Black Cat Systems
Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation
« on: June 25, 2019, 1745 UTC »
The new 550 kW 9330 kHz WBCQ transmitter is already causing overloading issues for many SWLs. One solution is to built a notch filter. This can easily be done using a Tee adapter and a piece of coax cut to 1/4 of the wavelength (taking into account the velocity factor of the coax). Put the Tee adapter in series with your coax run from antenna to radio. Then from the other part of the Tee connect the 1/4 section.

9330 kHz is 32.15 meters, 1/4 of that is 8.04 meters, or 26.13 feet. The velocity factor of coax varies depending on the type (and even run to run to some degree). I used RG-6 which is about 82%. That suggests 1/4 wavelength is about 21.42 ft. Cut it somewhat longer than that, then trim to get the notch where you want it. I ended up at about 21.6 ft long.

Here's two screenshots taken with SdrUno and an SdrPlay  RSP1A receiver, I used a homemade noise generator as the signal source. The top screenshot is without the notch filter, the second is with.  The notch is not going to just take out 9330, but also a good chunk of the 31 meter band as well, but the rest of HF is mostly unaffected (you will also get a notch at 3x the design frequency or about 28 MHz). It's fairly deep, 20 dB or so. 

Thanks to CommSigma for sending me in this direction.

Chris Smolinski
Westminster, MD
eQSLs appreciated! csmolinski@blackcatsystems.com
NRD 545 / netSDR / AFE822x / AirSpy HF+ / KiwiSDR / 670 ft horizontal loop / 500 ft northeast beverage / 58 ft T2FD / 300 ft south beverage / 43m / 20m / 10m  dipoles / Crossed Parallel Loop

Offline R4002

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 2526
    • View Profile
Re: Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2019, 1851 UTC »
Thanks Chris and COMMSIGMA.  I use both your KiwiSDRs on a pretty regular basis, and the WBCQ signal on 9330 kHz is insanely powerful (especially on the Westminster, MD KiwiSDR). 

A notch 3x up in frequency?  9330 kHz x3 is 27990 kHz (27.990 MHz).  Hmmm....would this mean a similar sized notch effect just below the 28.000 MHz 11 meter freeband / 10 meter amateur band interface?  While there isn't a lot of activity in the Americas in the upper portion of 27 MHz (unless the band is really busy), the UK FM band, CADS and WPAS bands (Irish Church Radio, UK FM CB, etc.) are 27601.25 to 27991.25 and 27605 to 27995.  Would the UK FM Channel 19, 27.78125 MHz / 27781.25 kHz be notched out as well? 

While most 11m CB activity tops out in the 27.8 MHz to 27.9 MHz region (channel 40 on the high band is 27.855 MHz), the 27.8 MHz to 28.0 MHz region is heavily used by 27 MHz Church transmitters and other 11m DX targets coming out of Europe, Ireland and the UK. 
U.S. East Coast, various HF/VHF/UHF radios/scanners/receivers

Offline Σ

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 175
    • View Profile
    • ΣSDR KiwiSDR online
Re: Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2019, 2322 UTC »
I haven't put a 9330 kHz filter on my SDR yet. I'm watching to see if the overloading is regularly occurring or not. I currently have one tuned to 7435 kHz to reduce the overloading affects of R. Marti that did occur almost nightly. Ideally, if I could rig up a coax switch on a timer that would only add them at night during the high signal strength time... hmmm. :)
Σ
CT/MA border
Afredri SDR-Net with multiband dipole at 65 ft.
KiwiSDR online - http://sigmasdr.ddns.net:8073/
ΣSDR Blog - https://sigmasdr.blogspot.com/

Offline Pigmeat

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 4281
    • View Profile
Re: Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2019, 0238 UTC »
Buy a real radio with knobs. They come with notch and noise filters installed.

Offline ChrisSmolinski

  • Administrator
  • Marconi Class DXer
  • *****
  • Posts: 23861
  • Westminster, MD USA
    • View Profile
    • Black Cat Systems
Re: Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation
« Reply #4 on: June 26, 2019, 1258 UTC »
Buy a real radio with knobs. They come with notch and noise filters installed.

Looks like Fansome hacked Pigmeat's account.
Chris Smolinski
Westminster, MD
eQSLs appreciated! csmolinski@blackcatsystems.com
NRD 545 / netSDR / AFE822x / AirSpy HF+ / KiwiSDR / 670 ft horizontal loop / 500 ft northeast beverage / 58 ft T2FD / 300 ft south beverage / 43m / 20m / 10m  dipoles / Crossed Parallel Loop

Offline i_hear_you

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation
« Reply #5 on: June 26, 2019, 1549 UTC »
I was listening to 9330 yesterday afternoon.  The broadcast sounded "hot," heavy audio compression squeezing the voices of both weeneys as they spoke, room noise pumping during pauses.  I understand heavy processing for intelligibility while QRP (if I don't make use of serious compression and EQing with my 15W I'm usually not understood,) but pushing a half-million I hope they decide to ease it back some.  It was extremely fatiguing to my ears.

Offline ThaDood

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 314
  • There
    • View Profile
    • Extreme Part #15!
    • Email
Re: Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2019, 1836 UTC »
You could always build a DIY Notch Filter.    http://www.wa4dsy.net/cgi-bin/lc_filter4?FilterResponse=Bandstop&poles=6&CF=9.330&cfunits=MHZ&cutoff=.020&funits=MHZ&Z=50       I've used a site like this to calculate a 7 Element Chebychev filter when I've built the 13.560MHz mW TX. One trick to really bring this filter dead-nuts perfect? Use all variable CAP's. The inductors you can wind yourselves.   http://www.wa4dsy.net/filter/filterdesign.html        There are other filter design sites out there, but this one works pretty well.
I can't decide upon what's worst, young and stupid, or old and chemically dumbed down.

Offline R4002

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 2526
    • View Profile
Re: Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation
« Reply #7 on: July 10, 2019, 1425 UTC »
I was listening to 9330 yesterday afternoon.  The broadcast sounded "hot," heavy audio compression squeezing the voices of both weeneys as they spoke, room noise pumping during pauses.  I understand heavy processing for intelligibility while QRP (if I don't make use of serious compression and EQing with my 15W I'm usually not understood,) but pushing a half-million I hope they decide to ease it back some.  It was extremely fatiguing to my ears.

I concur.  It does seem like they're running some pretty heavy compression...but there's differences from program to program, so there's also the possibility that the audio is being provided to WBCQ already compressed.  Who needs dynamic range anyway? [kidding]   with 550,000 watts carrier power, you can afford to have some dynamic range and make the audio sound nicer, especially for music. 
U.S. East Coast, various HF/VHF/UHF radios/scanners/receivers

Offline i_hear_you

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 109
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation
« Reply #8 on: July 10, 2019, 2100 UTC »
...but there's differences from program to program, so there's also the possibility that the audio is being provided to WBCQ already compressed.

I was listening to Bossman and his wife (Alan and Angela) who, I assume, should know better!

A question to the old-timers:  was this what it was like during the good 'ole days of shortwave broadcasting?  Were the Cuban, Russian and Chinese (and American, for that matter) propaganda stations shooting around the globe with 500k watts like the WBCQ super station?  I reckon I could RX WBCQ with a salty shoestring.

Back on topic, are any of you suffering from overloading?  I haven't noticed any on my end, but I'm still quite green and probably wouldn't know it if I saw it.  Are you talking about de-sensing on adjacent frequencies?  Images on other bands and so on?

Offline Σ

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 175
    • View Profile
    • ΣSDR KiwiSDR online
Re: Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation
« Reply #9 on: July 10, 2019, 2139 UTC »
Radio Moscow has some serious flame thrower transmitters. Sometimes the audio was very poor. I don't remember them splattering like China though. The old days of the late 70s and 80s were a lot of fun. You could hear tons of countries broadcasting and the content was often very good.
Σ
CT/MA border
Afredri SDR-Net with multiband dipole at 65 ft.
KiwiSDR online - http://sigmasdr.ddns.net:8073/
ΣSDR Blog - https://sigmasdr.blogspot.com/

Offline skeezix

  • Global Moderator
  • DX Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 3684
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • What does 'RNO stand for?
    • View Profile
Re: Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation
« Reply #10 on: July 11, 2019, 0248 UTC »
When are they going to switch to C-QUAM?

Minneapolis, MN

Offline ChrisSmolinski

  • Administrator
  • Marconi Class DXer
  • *****
  • Posts: 23861
  • Westminster, MD USA
    • View Profile
    • Black Cat Systems
Re: Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation
« Reply #11 on: July 11, 2019, 1225 UTC »
When are they going to switch to C-QUAM?

They could even switch to DRM and the audience would not get any smaller.
Chris Smolinski
Westminster, MD
eQSLs appreciated! csmolinski@blackcatsystems.com
NRD 545 / netSDR / AFE822x / AirSpy HF+ / KiwiSDR / 670 ft horizontal loop / 500 ft northeast beverage / 58 ft T2FD / 300 ft south beverage / 43m / 20m / 10m  dipoles / Crossed Parallel Loop

Online Ray Lalleu

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 8591
  • Western Europe, Western part of France
    • View Profile
Re: Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation
« Reply #12 on: July 11, 2019, 2052 UTC »

A question to the old-timers:  was this what it was like during the good 'ole days of shortwave broadcasting?  Were the Cuban, Russian and Chinese (and American, for that matter) propaganda stations shooting around the globe with 500k watts like the WBCQ super station?  I reckon I could RX WBCQ with a salty shoestring.
There were lots of high power transmitting stations. Many have been dismantled. The highest power was in  Grigoriopol with 1000 kW transmitters in SW. Now set back to 300 kW modern TXes  under Babcock management. Also don't forget the high gain antennas, and anything else carefully planned to give the strongest signals in the target areas. Look for the Radio Liberty in Playa de Pals, now dismantled.
D/E/F/G/It/Sp : Dutch/English/French/German/Italian/Spanish
Balanced wire antennas, wire lines and ATU
Ray, western France.

Offline Josh

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 3412
    • View Profile
Re: Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation
« Reply #13 on: July 11, 2019, 2107 UTC »
When are they going to switch to C-QUAM?

They could even switch to DRM and the audience would not get any smaller.

I second DRM use! Who wouldn't love hidef pics of Bro Stare?
Conveniently located near Vincennes Indiana.

Offline redhat

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 1198
  • USA
  • Music is my drug.
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Notch Filter for the 9330 kHz WBCQ SuperStation
« Reply #14 on: July 12, 2019, 1337 UTC »
When are they going to switch to C-QUAM?

They could even switch to DRM and the audience would not get any smaller.

At least C-QUAM is AM compatible...there would be something to hear during fades, unlike DRM.

+-RH
Somewhere under the stars...
WinRadio Excalibur/305 w/ a chi-town resonant loop, Kenwood KDC-U356 for mobile listening.
Please send QSL's and reception reports to xfmshortwave [at] gmail [d0t] com