We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Author Topic: F.C.C. Bars the Use of Airwaves for a Broadband Plan  (Read 1520 times)

Fansome

  • Guest
F.C.C. Bars the Use of Airwaves for a Broadband Plan
« on: February 15, 2012, 0215 UTC »
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/15/business/media/fcc-bars-airwave-use-for-broadband-plan.html?_r=1&hp

The New York Times

February 14, 2012
F.C.C. Bars the Use of Airwaves for a Broadband Plan
By EDWARD WYATT

WASHINGTON — A proposed wireless broadband network that would provide voice and Internet service using airwaves once reserved for satellite-telephone transmissions should be shelved because it interferes with GPS technology, the Federal Communications Commission said Tuesday.

The F.C.C. statement revokes the conditional approval for the network given last year. It comes after an opinion by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration, which said that “there is no practical way to mitigate the potential interference at this time” with GPS devices. The telecommunications and information agency oversees telecommunications policy at the Commerce Department.

The news appears to squash the near-term hopes for the network pushed by LightSquared, a Virginia company that is majority-owned by Philip Falcone, a New York hedge fund manager.

LightSquared said on Tuesday that the testing of the network was “severely flawed.” It “remains committed to finding a resolution with the federal government and the GPS industry to resolve all remaining concerns,” the company said in a statement.

The company said it “profoundly disagrees” with the results of the testing, which was done by a national engineering group, and the telecommunication agency’s opinions, “which disregard more than a decade of regulatory orders, and in doing so, jeopardize private enterprise, jobs and investment in America’s future.”

The F.C.C., which had granted a conditional approval to LightSquared to go ahead with its network pending the results of more testing, will now propose barring near-term deployment of the LightSquared system, the F.C.C. said. The commission will issue a request for public comment on the proposed action on Wednesday.

LightSquared has argued that its network would have relieved a potential “spectrum crunch” and created billions of dollars of investment and thousands of jobs in support of President Obama’s push to expand wireless Internet access around the country.

The network has been opposed by organizations and industries that make heavy use of GPS systems, including the military, aviation, construction and agriculture.

After earlier negative test results, LightSquared had proposed using only land-based transmitters and receivers, rather than satellites, to transmit broadband signals over a narrow slice of the satellite airwaves. The company intended to build a wholesale network, selling access to other companies that provide broadband service directly to consumers.

The telecommunications and information agency said tests showed that even a scaled-back version of the company’s wireless network would interfere with GPS signals and systems.

Interference of LightSquared’s signals with GPS systems is a tricky issue for the F.C.C., telecommunications experts say, because the interference appears not to be the fault of LightSquared. The most commonly used GPS receivers tend to pick up signals from outside of the segment of spectrum designated for GPS.

Because the satellite-telephone segment of airwaves, used by LightSquared, is next to the GPS band on the electromagnetic spectrum, GPS devices will frequently hear those extraneous transmissions.

The F.C.C. could have told GPS users and systems manufacturers that they were at fault for letting their devices stray into nearby airwaves, but that would mean overhauling an industry now in widespread use.

Jeff Carlisle, LightSquared’s executive vice president for regulatory affairs and public policy, wrote on the company’s blog this week that the GPS industry had apparently become “too big to fail,” seeking protection from the federal government for its own mistakes.

“GPS manufacturers have been selling devices that listen into frequencies outside of their assigned spectrum band — namely into LightSquared’s licensed band,” Mr. Carlisle wrote. “The GPS industry has leveraged years of insider relationships and massive lobbying dollars to make sure that they don’t have to fix the problem they created.”

Opposition to LightSquared’s network has come from the Pentagon and military industries, as well as from commercial companies like John Deere, whose advanced farm equipment uses GPS systems.

Last July, the Federal Aviation Administration issued a report saying that it would take 10 years for the civil aviation industry to design, develop, certify and install modified GPS equipment in the nation’s fleet of commercial and private jets.

But in January, after initial results of the latest round of testing began to appear in the media, LightSquared conducted a conference call with reporters in which the company’s executives said the testing requirements were aimed at producing a failing result and that members of the advisory board overseeing the testing “have deep ties with the same GPS manufacturers who have sold poorly designed equipment to America’s farmers, public safety officials, military and government agencies.”

Mr. Falcone’s hedge fund, Harbinger Capital Partners, lost more than 46 percent of its value last year because of declines in the value of LightSquared, a private company whose shares do not actively trade.

Harbinger marked down the value of its LightSquared investment by 50 percent in December, a move that came after a 9 percent markdown earlier in the year. The New York Times reported earlier this month that LightSquared accounted for an estimated 60 percent of Mr. Falcone’s fund.

Late last year, Mr. Falcone received a Wells Notice from the Securities and Exchange Commission, an action the agency typically takes when it is planning enforcement proceedings against a firm or individual. The Times reported in December that the S.E.C was investigating whether Harbinger agreed in 2009 to allow Goldman Sachs to withdraw up to $50 million from the firm’s hedge funds, while not striking similar deals with other clients.

In a federal filing disclosing the issue, Harbinger said that it was “disappointed” about the notices, and that it would “vigorously defend against” any formal charges.

Mr. Falcone was part of an investment group that bought 19 percent of the common stock of The New York Times Company and in 2008 reached a deal to award the group two new seats on the company’s board. The group urged the company to begin selling assets to help increase the stock price. One of the two directors has since left the board.

Offline jFarley

  • Marconi Class DXer
  • ********
  • Posts: 5922
  • near Chicago
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: F.C.C. Bars the Use of Airwaves for a Broadband Plan
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2012, 0319 UTC »
Absolutely hilarious, and sad, at the same time.  I particularly loved the FAA foot-dragging claim.
Joe Farley, Near Chicago
SDR-IQ / R8 / R7
Remote Resonant Loops for HF and LF / ALA 1530
Active 60" Whip / PA0RDT
QSLS appreciated to:    jfarley44@att.net

Offline CptFourA

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 49
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: F.C.C. Bars the Use of Airwaves for a Broadband Plan
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2012, 0403 UTC »
That is interesting. I can see both sides. I think what the FCC needs to focus on now is better part 15 regulation. As SWL's or Ham's we have all been affected by crappy electronics that are "Unintentional Radiators". Just because the widget does what it advertises to its intended user doesn't mean its "working well". If your crap isn't sufficiently filtering or suppressing as much as it should, just so you can shave some parts (and a few cents) off the device. People get so worried about cell phones and brain cancer but what about that plasma your plopped down in front of or that laptop you've got on your lap.

With the pressure on spectrum being what it is, you have to tighten up the ship. I guess what it comes down to is what the crap is interfering with, as always. If its some lowly HF band or some nothing VHF range, "oh well". If its a portion of the spectrum with industry behind it your crappy electronics aren't going to stay crappy long.

On the other hand to whine about the FCC stopping you from doing what you want as preventing private enterprise and harming jobs is just silly. When your product is vaporware and the incumbent industry is responsible for plenty of private enterprise and jobs of its own.

4a.

-= Mesa,Arizona =-
Icom IC-718 and doublet

Offline Zoidberg

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 2364
  • Gopher Stomp, Texas
  • i c u
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: F.C.C. Bars the Use of Airwaves for a Broadband Plan
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2012, 0152 UTC »
I think what the FCC needs to focus on now is better part 15 regulation. As SWL's or Ham's we have all been affected by crappy electronics that are "Unintentional Radiators". Just because the widget does what it advertises to its intended user doesn't mean its "working well". If your crap isn't sufficiently filtering or suppressing as much as it should, just so you can shave some parts (and a few cents) off the device.

Amen.  Failure to inspect crappy electronic doodads and enforce those regulations just serves to reinforce the FCC's appearance of being corporate shills.

And if the FCC is going to spend taxpayer's money in enforcement activity against unlicensed radio, they should be obligated to prove there's actual radio frequency interference.  Of course the problem with that is most of the valid concerns about RFI will point back to the flood of crappy imported electronics, rather than to intentional or unintentional jamming by radio operators.   >:(

Quote
...what about that plasma your plopped down in ... your lap.

Hey, leave my lap plasma out of this.  :o
That li'l ol' DXer from Texas
Unpleasant Frequencies Crew
Al: Palstar R30C & various antennae
Snoopy: Sony ICF-2010
Roger: Magnavox D2935
(Off-air recordings.)