Well... mine is a little different story, but not too much.
From 1987 to around 1994 I was a "gatekeeper" for the TV rebroadcast station in the city where I lived at the time. In a province in the interior of Argentina. With resources and property from the local council, we operated three signals placed on channels VHF 11, UHF 29 and UHF 35 respectively PAL-NC (German PAL mode but with NTSC line ratio, due to the need to provide compatibility -at the time of the arrival of color -, with the previous 525-line technology of monochrome televisions imported from the USA and our 50 electric cycles)
All with tree national "Ditel" transmitters of 500 watts each, in video, and a lower power ratio for the FM channel of the audio carrier.
In the first case, the station linked by air from the "previous" retransmitter in channell VHF 9, about 55 km away, suffered from continuous fading and saturation events in the summer "tropo" periods. I remember that the transmitter was prepared to turn off one minute after the start of the overload episode, which always caused a period of negative image and synchronization interruption that was quite undesirable to be transmitted.
On the other hand, the case of the two UHF stations was noticeably more stable.
Channel 29 was operated with satellite downlink and generally had no problems.
Channel 35 lasted for a while, remaining on "delayed program" (yes, even well into the '80s.) For years they sent me by bus an S-VHS cassette -recorded at the slowest possible speed with the "yesterday program without news segments."
-, which I plays when I arrived to do my daily revision of the station, after leaving high school, around 7 pm. And it auto power off when tape ends and video carrier dissapear. During the last three years of attendance, they put on a satellite disc also for this station.
The VHF channel antennas were simple bidirectional crossed yagis (without a reflector) were at the top on about 48 meters of mast, while the UHF panels (without plastic cover, it didn't snow there or anything like that), a little further down.
I remember that the VHF performance was better towards the surrounding towns up to about 40 kilometers with fairly low receiving antennas, but much more unstable due to the multiple interferences and atmospheric abnormalities of the band, while UHF had less performance (needing directional corner reflect antennas placed at greater height, but with a much more stable and "clean" signal. There were also many fewer complementary services and signal-based appliances generating spurious radioelectric radiation in urban plants.
Around 1995, when I started university in this other city, I passed the work to friend. Today the station is fully automatic with hardly any periodic inspection, but with many more errors and outages.