We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Author Topic: The History of UHF TV in America?  (Read 2123 times)

Offline ThaDood

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 1401
  • Likely, not where you are.
    • View Profile
    • Extreme Part #15!
    • Email
The History of UHF TV in America?
« on: February 11, 2025, 2105 UTC »
Being one who's worked for a UHF TV station, for like 7 years, I can appreciate this site.    https://uhfhistory.com/index.html
“I am often asked how radio works. Well, you see, wire telegraphy
is like a very long cat. You yank his tail in New York and he
meows in Los Angeles. Do you understand this? Now, radio is
exactly the same, except that there is no cat.”
-Attributed to Albert Einstein, but I ripped it from the latest Splatter .PDF March 2025 issue.

Offline ThaDood

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 1401
  • Likely, not where you are.
    • View Profile
    • Extreme Part #15!
    • Email
Re: The History of UHF TV in America? Oh, UHF, the movie?
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2025, 1748 UTC »
While I'm at it, remember the Weird Al flick that ripped the UHF TV thang years ago? Wellllllllllllllllllllll...      https://tubitv.com/movies/305029/uhf
“I am often asked how radio works. Well, you see, wire telegraphy
is like a very long cat. You yank his tail in New York and he
meows in Los Angeles. Do you understand this? Now, radio is
exactly the same, except that there is no cat.”
-Attributed to Albert Einstein, but I ripped it from the latest Splatter .PDF March 2025 issue.

Offline NQC

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 221
  • Boston,MA
    • View Profile
Re: The History of UHF TV in America?
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2025, 1303 UTC »
Hey ThaDood,

UHF went on here in Boston in  1953 w/WTAO /DuMont.

Failed/ off air 1/56. Back on air  continuous  since  1962 under new ownership.

FWIW, my UHF timeline is a  little fuzzy. I am pretty sure we never had a TV top converter box ( we got 4 VHF Ch's then). So we had to wait until my Dad bought a UHF capable TV.

This could have been as late as 1969.

And OT/ FWIW, our first FM receiver was also around '69 . FWIW,  this kitchen  radio was for my MOM - FM was NOT  given to  young kids back then.

MY first FM could have been a late as '73 or '74 (when I was 14 !). 

(with 4 kids, Dad  ran on a "budget").

UHF was initially  considered "second banana " (and  frankly a bit cheesy or dull )   compared to the "big  budget " stations like WBZ-TV.

 But  2 or 3   movies on Sunday ( and other programming ) eventually won us over  to UHF   .

In later years    UHF  often actually BEAT BZ and the other big  VHF's .

de NQC
« Last Edit: May 12, 2025, 1307 UTC by NQC »
Station main receiver : Bed springs to  blue razor blade detector to 2000 ohm cans to steam  radiator. Grid FN 42

Offline skeezix

  • Global Moderator
  • Marconi Class DXer
  • *****
  • Posts: 5796
  • Minneapolis, MN EN35
  • What does 'RNO stand for?
    • View Profile
Re: The History of UHF TV in America?
« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2025, 0150 UTC »
Here in the Minneapolis area, back in the early 80's, we had 17, 23, 29, and 41. 17 was PBS. As I remember, 23 & 29 had some good stuff. 41 was up in St Cloud and also had good programming, but it was at a distance and was weak here. But with analog, weak was still ok with patience. Weak digital today? Forget it. I sometimes have problems getting a UHF station from about 15 miles away putting out several hundred kW. Why? Who knows... I rarely watch TV these days, its primarily radio. That's where the action is.

Then there was ch 14... which was scrambled HBO from a tower downtown Mpls (as I recall). I think very early on it was not scrambled (1980 or 1981), then went scrambled and it that was that. I had read about a descrambler, but never pursued it.

My how the times have changed.

I did find this interesting from the website:

Quote
Lee's proposal would have moved FM up to 342-362 MHz, just as it was finally recovering from having been moved from 42-46 MHz to 88-108 MHz less than a decade earlier.

I have a couple of radios with 42-46 and 88-108, but had never heard of the 342-362 MHz proposal.

I'd propose to extend the current FM band down to 65 MHz.. A 65-108 MHz FM band would be great, as it would give a lot more room which also included OIRT & Japan.




Minneapolis, MN

Offline ThaDood

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 1401
  • Likely, not where you are.
    • View Profile
    • Extreme Part #15!
    • Email
Re: The History of UHF TV in America? 342 - 362MHz area?
« Reply #4 on: May 27, 2025, 1622 UTC »
A little 'off-topic' for TV, to talk about a proposed FM BC Band up in 300MHz, but... If, the FM BC Band was to be from 342 - 362MHz, there are perks & jerks to it. The perks??? Better S/N Ratio, with less noise from computer spurs, lightning, electrical interference, etc. Better penetration in buildings in urban areas. Smaller antennas could mean nice beams to put up. Oh... And, better distance from Tropo PROP, (DX'ers would like that.), but practically no Sporadic "E" effects. The downside jerks??? Mobile picket-fencing effects are way more pronounced. Foliage absorption attenuation is very pronounced up there. Long cable runs mean lots of attenuation there as well. And, penetration of signal in rouge / mountainous terrain would be even more difficult. (However, the plus-side there would be for more localized broadcasting for rural communities.) The US military has the band today, and I doubt that they'll give it up anytime soon. Propagation-wise, to compare to is what the current TV CH13 is like, in the lower 200MHz region. So, imagine propagation that's between what VHF TV CH13 and UHF TV CH14 would be. Just my $0.02 worth here.   
“I am often asked how radio works. Well, you see, wire telegraphy
is like a very long cat. You yank his tail in New York and he
meows in Los Angeles. Do you understand this? Now, radio is
exactly the same, except that there is no cat.”
-Attributed to Albert Einstein, but I ripped it from the latest Splatter .PDF March 2025 issue.

Offline NQC

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 221
  • Boston,MA
    • View Profile
Re: The History of UHF TV in America?
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2025, 2354 UTC »
Hey All,

Military aircraft is above and below the
“ proposed “ second FM band.

Not sure how fuzzy the USAF would be about the idea.

FWIW, Car  remotes run on one or more UHF aircraft frq.

 Anyway they are crazy low power, so may not matter re interference issues.

Back in ancient times, we had channel 27 running scrambled  movies for pay .

The would come out to your house and install a UHF yagi on your roof pointing towards the tower (not sure how much THAT install would cost you ! ) .

Apparently they then gave you a box . But being off the air not sure how they could deactivate recover the box if you stopped paying

( HONOR system ? Good luck.Drive by  remote RF shutdown? DOUBT it . Collection agency ?).

Someone came up with a ridiculously simple boot leg box ( a slug tuned coil in line on the center conductor in a shielded box - plastic screwdriver required ).

It cleaned up to watchable, but not great either.

The entire venture was technically ill advised, a scam or both .

It eventually folded.

No one ever bothered to their Yagis down.
 They were a reminder of this “ venture”for years afterwards.

NQC

« Last Edit: June 06, 2025, 0013 UTC by NQC »
Station main receiver : Bed springs to  blue razor blade detector to 2000 ohm cans to steam  radiator. Grid FN 42

Offline ChrisSmolinski

  • Administrator
  • Marconi Class DXer
  • *****
  • Posts: 32585
  • Westminster, MD USA
    • View Profile
    • Black Cat Systems
Re: The History of UHF TV in America?
« Reply #6 on: June 08, 2025, 1825 UTC »
Pay TV arrived in the DC (ch 50) and Baltimore (ch 54) areas in the 80s, IIRC branded as Super TV. A bit later than other cities IIRC, and they only lasted a few years before cable TV market penetration was enough to take away enough of their listeners. Both stations stayed on the air afterwards as regular TV stations. As I recall, they ran unscrambled programming until around 7 pm, maybe earlier on weekends. This may have been an FCC mandate?

I do believe they could disable boxes remotely via addressing. The scrambling was the usual - mess up the horizontal and maybe vertical sync enough so a regular TV could not lock on, and move the audio subcarrier frequency. They may have inverted the luminance and chroma signals as well? there were 3rd party boxes on the market of course.

Aha, wikipedia has a page about them, some of my vague memories were mostly correct: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_TV_(American_TV_channel)
Chris Smolinski
Westminster, MD
eQSLs appreciated! csmolinski@blackcatsystems.com
netSDR / AFE822x / AirSpy HF+ / KiwiSDR / 900 ft Horz skyloop / 500 ft NE beverage / 250 ft V Beam / 58 ft T2FD / 120 ft T2FD / 400 ft south beverage / 43m, 20m, 10m  dipoles / Crossed Parallel Loop / Discone in a tree

 

HFUnderground T-Shirt
HFUnderground T-Shirt
by MitchellTimeDesigns