We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Author Topic: Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts  (Read 5362 times)

Offline ChrisSmolinski

  • Administrator
  • Marconi Class DXer
  • *****
  • Posts: 33557
  • Westminster, MD USA
    • Black Cat Systems
Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts
« on: January 17, 2014, 1147 UTC »
FYI: I understand that the Hudson County TIS on 1710 KHz is going to 100 watts (or already is, testing). This will likely make it even more difficult to hear pirates on 1710.
Chris Smolinski
Westminster, MD
eQSLs appreciated! csmolinski@blackcatsystems.com
netSDR / AFE822x / AirSpy HF+ / KiwiSDR / 900 ft Horz skyloop / 500 ft NE beverage / 250 ft V Beam / 58 ft T2FD / 120 ft T2FD / 400 ft south beverage / 43m, 20m, 10m  dipoles / Crossed Parallel Loop / Discone in a tree

Offline atrainradio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
  • Pronouns AM/FM
Re: Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2014, 2048 UTC »
How'd you hear about this?
KD2VEG
QTH, Queens
Tecsun PL-990 w/ outdoor FM omni and 40m dipole, RTL-SDR, Grundig Sat 750

Offline Kilokat7

  • Global Moderator
  • DX Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 1456
  • West Michigan
  • FFFR
    • Kilokat7 DX
Re: Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2014, 2304 UTC »
How'd you hear about this?

MW loggings forum :-)
PLS QSL kilokat7(at)gmail.com
Location: Western Michigan
Perseus SDR / DKAZ loops
West Michigan DX

Offline ChrisSmolinski

  • Administrator
  • Marconi Class DXer
  • *****
  • Posts: 33557
  • Westminster, MD USA
    • Black Cat Systems
Re: Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2014, 2316 UTC »
How'd you hear about this?

MW loggings forum :-)

Yep :-)

Just thought I'd spread the word... I guess I'll be listening to 1720 more often.
Chris Smolinski
Westminster, MD
eQSLs appreciated! csmolinski@blackcatsystems.com
netSDR / AFE822x / AirSpy HF+ / KiwiSDR / 900 ft Horz skyloop / 500 ft NE beverage / 250 ft V Beam / 58 ft T2FD / 120 ft T2FD / 400 ft south beverage / 43m, 20m, 10m  dipoles / Crossed Parallel Loop / Discone in a tree

Offline redhat

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 1598
  • USA
  • Music is my drug.
    • Email
Re: Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts
« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2014, 0548 UTC »
This puts medium wave operators in a quandary;  Do we abandon 1710 (and all the casual listeners that might stumble upon MW pirates) in favor of 1720, which cannot be received on any domestic AM receivers?  Or do we use both?

Questions, questions....

+-RH
Somewhere under the stars...
Airspy HF+, MLA-30/Mini-whip/Chi-Town Loop
Please send QSL's and reception reports to xfmshortwave [at] proton [d0t] me

Offline John Poet

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 1129
  • USA
  • The dog ate my license.
    • The Crystal Ship Shortwave
    • Email
Re: Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2014, 0416 UTC »
WTF is the FCC doing, authorizing a station for out-of-band ? !


John Poet

"A treasonous voice of dissent"
"I love the smell of a hot Johnson in the morning..."



The Crystal Ship Shortwave

On Twitter  https://x.com/tcsshortwave
.

Offline BDM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
  • S/E Michigan
Re: Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2014, 0501 UTC »
My take on this. Sadly the TIS is creating interference. Celestial Radio also creates issues on Pirate Clear Channel 1710 :(  Anyhow, how many actual "regular Joe's" stumble into broadcast on 1710? I believe very very few. Naturally a regular Joe probably won't understand what he/she is listening to nor may not even care, nor even consider reporting it on one of the many websites. Not to mention most "John Q public's" only stand a chance with their car radio and most of us know they're not tuning the high end of the "X" band. I believe most folks who cruise the "X" band are enthusiast like you or me. Also most are going to have the capability to hear above 1710, I say most. Another thing to consider is that many enthusiast are either not setup to operate the lower bands properly (poor antenna and/or equipment choices), or suffer serious noise issues, or both compared to the SW spectrum.

I would be interested in knowing if any of our fine former/current free radio broadcasters on 1710 have ever received a reception report from a regular John Q public? While the idea to operate on 1710 is preferred regardless since anyone stands a chance to pick up the broadcast. I doubt real world listener-ship will suffer by moving up to 1720. 20 years ago maybe, but today, nah..... Just MHO :)
« Last Edit: January 22, 2014, 1529 UTC by BDM »
Radios -- Perseus SDR // SDRPlay RSPdx-R2 // Icom IC-7300 // // Yaesu FT-991A // Tecsun PL-990x // Realistic DX-440 // Panasonic RF-5000A --Antennas-- Pixel Pro 1B loop - 82' fan-dipole at 40' - tuned MW/BCB 40" loop and 100' receive only dipole
-Brian--North of Detroit--MI-
1710/KHz the MW Pirate Clear Channel (not so much anymore "sigh")

Offline ChrisSmolinski

  • Administrator
  • Marconi Class DXer
  • *****
  • Posts: 33557
  • Westminster, MD USA
    • Black Cat Systems
Re: Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2014, 1727 UTC »
I agree, pirates aren't going to be losing too many listeners by moving up to 1720. I'm speaking of what I refer to as the "radio hobbyist" pirates, catering to the SW pirate crowd, vs the local radio pirates, that probably hang out on clear slots in the 16xx range anyway.
Chris Smolinski
Westminster, MD
eQSLs appreciated! csmolinski@blackcatsystems.com
netSDR / AFE822x / AirSpy HF+ / KiwiSDR / 900 ft Horz skyloop / 500 ft NE beverage / 250 ft V Beam / 58 ft T2FD / 120 ft T2FD / 400 ft south beverage / 43m, 20m, 10m  dipoles / Crossed Parallel Loop / Discone in a tree

Offline redhat

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 1598
  • USA
  • Music is my drug.
    • Email
Re: Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2014, 1742 UTC »
I just like the idea that a broader audience could be had by using frequencies that the average American (An important distinction, as the rest of the world stops at 1610KHz.) could hear.  Sometime toward the end of the year we may be doing some MW testing.  That's the goal anyway, lots of hurdles to overcome.  The number of radios that get 1710 is getting smaller and smaller.  Both of my Kenwood car stereos stop at 1700, and most Chrysler radios do too.  I think the GM Delco's go to 1710, as do Carver TX-11a's, and a variety of Walkmans, component tuners, and bookshelf systems at my disposal.

More stereo for your radio ;)

+-RH
Somewhere under the stars...
Airspy HF+, MLA-30/Mini-whip/Chi-Town Loop
Please send QSL's and reception reports to xfmshortwave [at] proton [d0t] me

Offline BDM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
  • S/E Michigan
Re: Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2014, 1755 UTC »
The number of radios that get 1710 is getting smaller and smaller.  Both of my Kenwood car stereos stop at 1700, and most Chrysler radios do too.  I think the GM Delco's go to 1710, as do Carver TX-11a's, and a variety of Walkmans, component tuners, and bookshelf systems at my disposal.

More stereo for your radio ;)

+-RH

Ohh, wasn't aware of this fact. 1710 going away in radios, ugh, sacrilege!
Radios -- Perseus SDR // SDRPlay RSPdx-R2 // Icom IC-7300 // // Yaesu FT-991A // Tecsun PL-990x // Realistic DX-440 // Panasonic RF-5000A --Antennas-- Pixel Pro 1B loop - 82' fan-dipole at 40' - tuned MW/BCB 40" loop and 100' receive only dipole
-Brian--North of Detroit--MI-
1710/KHz the MW Pirate Clear Channel (not so much anymore "sigh")

Offline redhat

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 1598
  • USA
  • Music is my drug.
    • Email
Re: Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts
« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2014, 1806 UTC »
One other thing I forgot to mention, there are a lot of people out there that never report anything.  Even if you give out an email or postal address, I think a lot of people just grin, listen to the music, and move on.  Only the diehards send in reports and such.  The fact that I could be on the air, and call up my cousin several states away and say "go to you car and tell me what you got on 1710" has some merit.

+-RH
Somewhere under the stars...
Airspy HF+, MLA-30/Mini-whip/Chi-Town Loop
Please send QSL's and reception reports to xfmshortwave [at] proton [d0t] me

Offline ChrisSmolinski

  • Administrator
  • Marconi Class DXer
  • *****
  • Posts: 33557
  • Westminster, MD USA
    • Black Cat Systems
Re: Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts
« Reply #11 on: January 22, 2014, 1854 UTC »
How clear is 1610, once you get far enough away from Toronto? 
It's blocked here, FWIW. Solid S9+10 in the evening.

Chris Smolinski
Westminster, MD
eQSLs appreciated! csmolinski@blackcatsystems.com
netSDR / AFE822x / AirSpy HF+ / KiwiSDR / 900 ft Horz skyloop / 500 ft NE beverage / 250 ft V Beam / 58 ft T2FD / 120 ft T2FD / 400 ft south beverage / 43m, 20m, 10m  dipoles / Crossed Parallel Loop / Discone in a tree

Offline BDM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
  • S/E Michigan
Re: Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts
« Reply #12 on: January 22, 2014, 2039 UTC »
One other thing I forgot to mention, there are a lot of people out there that never report anything.  Even if you give out an email or postal address, I think a lot of people just grin, listen to the music, and move on.  Only the diehards send in reports and such.  The fact that I could be on the air, and call up my cousin several states away and say "go to you car and tell me what you got on 1710" has some merit.

+-RH

Yes the chances of a John Q Public catching a broadcast are possible however, very unlikely just from my own experience with the average Joe. Now with all the post/reception reports regarding MW/1710 catches, many are far more aware of this being used by free radio broadcasters. I even heard HAMs talking about 1710 catches a few times in the 80m band last spring/summer. As it stands now, our friendly area TIS and religious/ethnic broadcaster out of the Bronx ain't going away anytime soon. 1720 affords us a nice clean clear broadcast capture. That for me is equally important for enjoying the broadcast itself ;)

Over the last few years I've noticed many reception post regarding the Big Q (probably the biggest user of 1710 for some time) as hard to hear or being completely covered by our friendly east-coast broadcasters. This wouldn't have occurred on 1720. But as you say, they probably would have lost a few John Q Public's doing that. Oh what to do what to do.... Well, obviously it is up to you fine folks who plan on utilizing these freqs. I will follow where ever you go regardless  ;D
Radios -- Perseus SDR // SDRPlay RSPdx-R2 // Icom IC-7300 // // Yaesu FT-991A // Tecsun PL-990x // Realistic DX-440 // Panasonic RF-5000A --Antennas-- Pixel Pro 1B loop - 82' fan-dipole at 40' - tuned MW/BCB 40" loop and 100' receive only dipole
-Brian--North of Detroit--MI-
1710/KHz the MW Pirate Clear Channel (not so much anymore "sigh")

Offline BDM

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
  • S/E Michigan
Re: Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts
« Reply #13 on: January 22, 2014, 2042 UTC »
How clear is 1610, once you get far enough away from Toronto?  
It's blocked here, FWIW. Solid S9+10 in the evening.



CJWI and CHHA make it near impossible at my location. With signal strengths from them topping out easily in the red in the late evening :P  For someone in the outer midwest and southern/western states, it may make a good freq. Provided they do not have a TIS in their backyard so to say.

EDIT: This is interesting
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CJWI
According to that info, they no longer broadcast on 1610. I know I hear more than one player on 1610. I'll need to pay closer attention.
« Last Edit: January 22, 2014, 2056 UTC by BDM »
Radios -- Perseus SDR // SDRPlay RSPdx-R2 // Icom IC-7300 // // Yaesu FT-991A // Tecsun PL-990x // Realistic DX-440 // Panasonic RF-5000A --Antennas-- Pixel Pro 1B loop - 82' fan-dipole at 40' - tuned MW/BCB 40" loop and 100' receive only dipole
-Brian--North of Detroit--MI-
1710/KHz the MW Pirate Clear Channel (not so much anymore "sigh")

Offline refmo

  • Marconi Class DXer
  • ********
  • Posts: 8099
  • Northeast Kentucky
Re: Hudson County TIS 1710 Going to 100 Watts
« Reply #14 on: January 22, 2014, 2313 UTC »
How clear is 1610, once you get far enough away from Toronto? 
It's blocked here, FWIW. Solid S9+10 in the evening.



At my QTH, 1610,1620, and 1700 are all occupied by local TIS stations.
I believe the situation is better if you are not near cities and state/national parks.
Northeast Kentucky
Please eQSL to refmo[at]outlook[dot]com
Radios: Afedri AFE822x, Airspy HF+, RX-888, RSPdx, Tecsun PL880
Antennas: 700' Loop Skywire, Wellbrook ALA1530LN Loop, 400' Beverage, low dipoles on upper bands.

 

HFUnderground T-Shirt
HFUnderground Garden Flag
by MitchellTimeDesigns