We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Author Topic: homeland security  (Read 1666 times)

Nella F.

  • Guest
homeland security
« on: January 22, 2014, 2358 UTC »
Has anyone heard traffic on the following frequ.'s as per Monitoring Times Federal File column from March of 2013:  165.8375; 166.4625; 168.35; 170; 166.5875; 168.5875; 170.7875; 408.2875; 412.4375; 417.3875.
I haven't heard squat, data burst, digital or other.

Offline redhat

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 1592
  • USA
  • Music is my drug.
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: homeland security
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2014, 0805 UTC »
My guess is your location will likely influence your likelyhood of hearing something.  I would guess that anything they use will be APCO-25 with some form of encryption.

+-RH
Somewhere under the stars...
Airspy HF+, MLA-30/Mini-whip/Chi-Town Loop
Please send QSL's and reception reports to xfmshortwave [at] proton [d0t] me

Nella F.

  • Guest
Re: homeland security
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2014, 0102 UTC »
As soon as I get home I'll dig out the instructions for my Pro-94 & see if it's apco-25 capable. I don't recall in the "M. T." article that the frequ.'s listed were part of a "trunked" system. If they were I wouldn't of bothered programing them. Where I live there are no "trunked" systems so I haven't bothered to master that part of my scanner. And certainly if they are "encrypted" I doubt "M.T." would supply the frequ.'s. in the first place. Unless I'm missing something (very possible).  Any other comments?
« Last Edit: January 24, 2014, 0104 UTC by Nella F. »

Nella F.

  • Guest
Re: homeland security
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2014, 0110 UTC »
Ahhh, I just googled and found on radioreference.com that my Pro-94 can't hear apco-25. So there too.
Guess I'm out of luck.
Thanks for contributing rh.
« Last Edit: January 24, 2014, 0112 UTC by Nella F. »

Offline redhat

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 1592
  • USA
  • Music is my drug.
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: homeland security
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2014, 0122 UTC »
I'm not sure if they would be trunked or not.  P25 is the norm now.  I worked for a TV station at one point that bought a P25 capable scanner for news purposes.  All the stuff they wanted to hear was encrypted :)  This is also becoming the norm for EMS, fire, and police, at least in the areas I've surveyed.

Good luck,

+-RH


...The 'Old Professor says "Your 9-11 tax dollars at work!"
Somewhere under the stars...
Airspy HF+, MLA-30/Mini-whip/Chi-Town Loop
Please send QSL's and reception reports to xfmshortwave [at] proton [d0t] me

 

HFUnderground T-Shirt
HFUnderground House Flag
by MitchellTimeDesigns