We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Author Topic: SDRs vs Sun Spot Number  (Read 1793 times)

Offline ChrisSmolinski

  • Administrator
  • Marconi Class DXer
  • *****
  • Posts: 31284
  • Westminster, MD USA
    • View Profile
    • Black Cat Systems
SDRs vs Sun Spot Number
« on: July 19, 2014, 2157 UTC »
Chris Smolinski
Westminster, MD
eQSLs appreciated! csmolinski@blackcatsystems.com
netSDR / AFE822x / AirSpy HF+ / KiwiSDR / 900 ft Horz skyloop / 500 ft NE beverage / 250 ft V Beam / 58 ft T2FD / 120 ft T2FD / 400 ft south beverage / 43m, 20m, 10m  dipoles / Crossed Parallel Loop / Discone in a tree

Offline jFarley

  • Marconi Class DXer
  • ********
  • Posts: 5922
  • near Chicago
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: SDRs vs Sun Spot Number
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2014, 2328 UTC »
Perhaps the ritual sacrifice of a virgin SDR will appease the Sun God?  We could tie it to a boatanchor and pitch both into the Sacred Cenote at Chichen Itza.
Joe Farley, Near Chicago
SDR-IQ / R8 / R7
Remote Resonant Loops for HF and LF / ALA 1530
Active 60" Whip / PA0RDT
QSLS appreciated to:    jfarley44@att.net

rdla4

  • Guest
Re: SDRs vs Sun Spot Number
« Reply #2 on: July 19, 2014, 2348 UTC »
Based on the graph, and the "law" of supply and demand, I am expecting to hear radio commercials that advise you to sell gold and buy SDRs. Lucky me, I got in on the ground floor of this investment

Offline skeezix

  • Global Moderator
  • Marconi Class DXer
  • *****
  • Posts: 5554
  • Minneapolis, MN
  • What does 'RNO stand for?
    • View Profile
Re: SDRs vs Sun Spot Number
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2014, 0057 UTC »
Well, its pretty clear from that graph that the SDRs are interfering with the sun creating them things. SDRs are unnatural and the sun knows it, so its denying us propagation.


jFarley has inspired an idea- Instead of tying an SDR to a boatanchor, what if instead, make an analog SDR with vacuum tubes? Not only may it appease the sun god, but would also survive an EMP (don't bring up the point that the computer & power grid wouldn't. Next step is an analog computer made from vacuum tubes. We've done that before, and can do it again in 2014, better...stronger...faster. ).

Yes... yes.... Analog SDR sends the data to the control unit, which is some form of embedded SDR s/w. Tuners, home entertainment systems, and car stereos. Portable radios may be a bit tricky, so need to invent better power source than chemical batteries.
 
The sunspots will return!
Minneapolis, MN

Offline ka1iic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 903
  • Troy, Ohio
  • Troy, Ohio. 20m Vertical & low long wire E/W,
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: SDRs vs Sun Spot Number
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2014, 0318 UTC »
time to stock up on 12AU7's for that next fun computer thingie ;-)  Don't forget the 6080's too also <grin>
73 Vince
KA1IIC

"If you can't be anything, you can at least be annoying"

Troy, Ohio. 20m Vertical & low long wire E/W, Yaesu FT-187ND, SDRplay 2, Ratt Shack 2 meter rig, and other little bits of electronics I'm not talking about, homebrewed and otherwise... so there bleech!

Fansome

  • Guest
Re: SDRs vs Sun Spot Number
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2014, 0526 UTC »
Once again, science vindicates Fansome. It's too bad it took this long; the situation is probably irreparable. We'll probably never see a sunspot again, and now we know whom to blame.