We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Author Topic: Calibrated receive frequency  (Read 1191 times)

Matt285

  • Guest
Calibrated receive frequency
« on: December 20, 2019, 2307 UTC »
I feel a bit silly asking this, but I see a lot of postings labeled with such frequencies as 13475.7, 12090.3, 6950.1 etc. What I wanted to know is how do you get such an accurate frequency when the transmission is likely perfectly modulated at a flat frequency such as 14.200? I'm not saying people are proposing it has a guess. I just wonder what factors hone in on dead center when everyone has a different ear for sounds. For instance when im on HF transmitting and receiving I just leave the dial set to where the persons voice is clear and I feel like im likely on frequency as well.

Offline redhat

  • DX Legend
  • ******
  • Posts: 1586
  • USA
  • Music is my drug.
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Calibrated receive frequency
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2019, 0009 UTC »
If an AM signal is being monitored, it is fairly easy to determine by measuring the carrier frequency on an SDR.  With SSB transmissions, often this needs to be done by ear and takes a lot of practice.  Also, your measurements are only as accurate as your receiver's timebase.  I periodically calibrate my WinRadio against WWV for this reason.

+-RH
Somewhere under the stars...
Airspy HF+, MLA-30/Mini-whip/Chi-Town Loop
Please send QSL's and reception reports to xfmshortwave [at] proton [d0t] me

Matt285

  • Guest
Re: Calibrated receive frequency
« Reply #2 on: December 21, 2019, 0019 UTC »
Thanks for the reply. I never thought I would want an SDR receiver, but I plan on buying a RSPdx receiver in a month or so. All the features and full  spectrum monitoring are awesome. Im also really excited about  having 3 switchable antenna ports. I will still always have a love for turning a dial though and will always have a traditional rig. I think I can learn a lot from it though and broaden my skills as a whole from using an SDR.

Offline ChrisSmolinski

  • Administrator
  • Marconi Class DXer
  • *****
  • Posts: 31195
  • Westminster, MD USA
    • View Profile
    • Black Cat Systems
Re: Calibrated receive frequency
« Reply #3 on: December 21, 2019, 1521 UTC »
I have several SDSs, my netSDR has a GPS derived 10 MHz reference, so I am able to make 1 Hz or better measurements of carrier frequencies.

Once I went the SDR route, I gave up on using radio with knobs. Barbaric  :)
Chris Smolinski
Westminster, MD
eQSLs appreciated! csmolinski@blackcatsystems.com
netSDR / AFE822x / AirSpy HF+ / KiwiSDR / 900 ft Horz skyloop / 500 ft NE beverage / 250 ft V Beam / 58 ft T2FD / 120 ft T2FD / 400 ft south beverage / 43m, 20m, 10m  dipoles / Crossed Parallel Loop / Discone in a tree

Offline NJQA

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
  • Virginia
    • View Profile
Re: Calibrated receive frequency
« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2019, 1548 UTC »
Once I went the SDR route, I gave up on using radio with knobs. Barbaric  :)

Knobs aren’t the issue.  Isn’t it really giving up on the use of radios without spectral displays?  Listening on a conventional radio feels like driving with blinders on.   I gotta know what is going on around me.

Matt285

  • Guest
Re: Calibrated receive frequency
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2019, 1552 UTC »
Yes. i can understand. Im going to post a question on the SDR forum about another aspect.

Offline ChrisSmolinski

  • Administrator
  • Marconi Class DXer
  • *****
  • Posts: 31195
  • Westminster, MD USA
    • View Profile
    • Black Cat Systems
Re: Calibrated receive frequency
« Reply #6 on: December 21, 2019, 1612 UTC »
Once I went the SDR route, I gave up on using radio with knobs. Barbaric  :)

Knobs aren’t the issue.  Isn’t it really giving up on the use of radios without spectral displays?  Listening on a conventional radio feels like driving with blinders on.   I gotta know what is going on around me.

Definitely, the waterfall and being able to see the entire band at once is important.

Also for me, the ability to record the entire band overnight, and then quickly go through it looking for transmissions of interest. Once you get used to that, going back to a conventional radio is impossible.
Chris Smolinski
Westminster, MD
eQSLs appreciated! csmolinski@blackcatsystems.com
netSDR / AFE822x / AirSpy HF+ / KiwiSDR / 900 ft Horz skyloop / 500 ft NE beverage / 250 ft V Beam / 58 ft T2FD / 120 ft T2FD / 400 ft south beverage / 43m, 20m, 10m  dipoles / Crossed Parallel Loop / Discone in a tree

Offline Josh

  • DXing Phenomena
  • *******
  • Posts: 4322
    • View Profile
Re: Calibrated receive frequency
« Reply #7 on: December 21, 2019, 1637 UTC »
Once I went the SDR route, I gave up on using radio with knobs. Barbaric  :)

Knobs aren’t the issue.  Isn’t it really giving up on the use of radios without spectral displays?  Listening on a conventional radio feels like driving with blinders on.   I gotta know what is going on around me.

I had a heck of a time going from a 756 Pro (has fishfinder) to a 746 Pro (does not has fishfinder). Never want to go through those kind of withdrawls again.
We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations.

Offline Brian

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 521
  • Ireland
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Calibrated receive frequency
« Reply #8 on: December 21, 2019, 2200 UTC »
I switch to USB and tune for min beat.