When looking at others' comparisons of antennas, particularly loops, it's important to consider the RF environment where the comparisons were made.
In the typical high RFI urban/suburban environments, it's quite possible for inexpensive antennas such as the W6LVP to compare favorably with a Wellbrook/etc. That's not because the loops actually have the same performance, but rather because the local high RFI levels are the limiting factor.
If you live in such an area, then yes, it doesn't make sense to buy a "better" antenna since you won't be able to take advantage of the higher performance. The same goes for erecting large passive antennas. Even if you had the room to install a 500 ft Beverage or Sky Loop on a city lot, there's really no point.
But if you live in a rural / low RFI environment, the situation is likely much different, and better performing antennas start to make sense.
Of course you can always make a bad situation worse, even in relatively high RFI environments, by using very poorly made active antennas that cause all sorts of problems (overloading, images, mixing products, etc). The goal is not more signal, the goal is a higher signal to noise ratio. Modern communications receivers and high performance SDRs are very sensitive, and can work extremely well with "low" signal levels, such as from Beverage antennas.