We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Synthetik Mayham

Pages: [1] 2
1
0003Z I've got it about 6944.5...fair strength but audio is very distorted to me...west coast, maybe peaking to S3 but pretty much unintelligible.
0018Z has drifted down to about 6944.3...still very distorted audio

we narrowed it down to a loop of rf down the audio cable back into the transmitter should be good to go in the future

2
5/3 report significant fading hearing talking and then music at 0442 but nothing overly legible atm will try catch it on a peak

 my beam says directly west of my qth so my guess west coast bc/washington/cali

3
And broadcast concluded at 0404 thanks for listening for those who could

4
Appreciate the welcome thanks yes new broadcaster testing various antenna configurations and xtmr designs see best results but I agree band conditions have been Piss poor on all band lately 40m has been ok ssb with some power but that's about it

But thanks for the welcome I operate mostly covert portable atm :) 35w carrier atm

5
Hurm that's to bad wondering what tonight's conditions are like currently running at about 30w I shall leave it running :)

Thanks for the reports

6
North American Shortwave Pirate / Radio After Dark 6952.5 AM 01:37 UTC
« on: November 17, 2015, 0140 UTC »
Currently running a show at 6952.5 I apologies I have not designed qsl cards yet or made and jingle intros strictly music stay tuned in the near future for sstv / qsl cards

All audio samples appreciated and station reports to Canadianradioafterdark at gmail dot com

7
North American Shortwave Pirate / Re: UNID 6952.5 AM 2359 UTC 15Nov15
« on: November 16, 2015, 0233 UTC »
And offline at 0232 thank you for the reports

-sm

8
North American Shortwave Pirate / Re: UNID 6952.5 AM 2359 UTC 15Nov15
« on: November 16, 2015, 0122 UTC »
Good to hear thanks for the report strange your off the ends of the antenna with polarity North / south ah well propgation does strange things

9
North American Shortwave Pirate / Re: UNID 6952.5 AM 2359 UTC 15Nov15
« on: November 16, 2015, 0119 UTC »
Welp glad I'm making it some where currently countrified soul playing im testing a new tx design apologies for the shakey show and random song flips testing actual levels rather then into a dummy load my bad

Enjoy tonight's show

I'm currently trying to figure out why I'm 20kc off freq atm however

Apologies if some of you are not country fans

10
Second station moved up to 6950 or so

S5 here on this one at 0153 in Alberta Canada

11
Disappeared for a while now hearing it at a s4-s5 at 0427 UTC

Rolling Stones under cover of night 0427
The who i can see for miles 0429

12
North American Shortwave Pirate / UNID 6925 AM 0214 UTC Nov 10 2015
« on: November 10, 2015, 0215 UTC »
S7

0215 the who I can see for miles
0226 Stephan wolf - rock me

13
faint faint s2-s3 not overly made out even with swinging my beam around a full 360 in central alberta canada

14
Good solid s5-s9 now over in central alberta fair amount of fading your bottom though is about a s3 top end seen some good s9's  for sure some good programming tonight at 0345UTC

15
Equipment / Re: 43 meter dipole
« on: October 13, 2015, 1832 UTC »
With a 1:1 balun, 75 ohm coax is a better match than 50 ohm for a 73 ohm dipole. Of course, chances are the only place in the universe your dipole is actually 73 ohms is in a NEC simulation.

For receiving only, matching is not super critical. I personally use 75 ohm RG-6 coax because it is cheap and easily found. I usually leave the F connectors on and use adapters as necessary.


I don't mean to step on toes and be a ass especially because I'm "new" to your guys world but here's the thing your radio what ever it may be is expecting a 50ohm impedance by using a 75ohm coax (TV coax) you now have a loss then add your dipole which is yes in a perfect world 73ohm again there are more factors for me to list that would impact impedance of a dipole

The purpose of a balun or balance unbalance transformer is to match the impedance of your antenna to te nominal impedance of the coax going to your radio not the coax to the radio

Yes 75 ohm coax is a better match for the dipole and in that very instance a balun would not be nessicarily at all ! Other then to seperate the sheild from the antenna in which case you could use a ugly balun however the goal and objective is to Match the impedence of the radio

Again kinda superficial because you won't be transmitting

With that said things to take into consideration when using TV coax firstly it is not even close to 100% shielding like no where near 2 it has a high db loss over larger runs 3 if you use regular F connector you might as well just through a attenuator on the line then on top of the adding adapters even more attenuation

IM by no means saying it won't work im simply saying that if you want your best quality signal and you want a dipole that's ideal with low loss your best solution is to cut each legs to resonance add insulators on both ends of the less put a 1:1 balun in the center of that feed it with preferably N connectors however regular pl259 -so239 will work just fine use a good quality low loss coax with a 50ohm impedance to your radio on runs less then 35-40 feet I would just use regular rg-58u coax and then seal the outside end with butyl tape to prevent water ingress additional to cut back on some noise you can make a air wound choke with coax or use clip on ferrite beads to keep crap off the shield of the coax from near by Ed noise sources


My 2 worthless Canadian cents


Pages: [1] 2