16
Part 15 AM and FM Station Operation / Re: Talking House Transmitter - some spectrum plots
« on: September 26, 2020, 1920 UTC »Narrowing the bw will also give a slight increase in range, for those stations that can match that bw on rx.I generally agree with this, but I think it has more to do with packing the audio tightly in that bandwidth than it does simply limiting bandwidth.
I've tried both extensively and found that bandwidth restriction alone doesn't seem to have a huge impact, or any that I can tell at all from practical distances. It does give feel good points though so you know you're not interfering with adjacent stations.
What does matter is really cramming the audio into, as you suggested, the bandwidth of the average radio. Placing the NRSC curve to put some punch out to 5kHz makes a ton of difference, beyond that it's up to the station, and my preference is to ride the bandwidth so that up to 5kHz there is strong presence on soft passages or limited audio range (voice), and push the 5-9.5kHz hard to the standard curve, then drop it with the brick wall after that to comply like the big sticks. That presence around 2-5kHz needs to have its own care though or else it will sound awful on music. Professional audio processors actually treat this range specially with analyzing circuitry (or software) so that voice has punch and music remains full and good, and it's an art.
Remember stories of hot audio processors of yesteryear damaging old radio station transmitters? Running tubes too hot or pounding the mod transformer until destruction? That is what gets loudness and to really get that you need 100% modulation peaks and 95-98% neg. Maybe that is what the talking house transmitter needs? Sounds like a fun project
Not even sure if the thing can do close to 100% positive, or asymmetrical peak riding even though Stereotool can try its hardest to provide it.