We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - NJQA

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22
241
Equipment / Consumer grade antenna splitters
« on: December 27, 2019, 1443 UTC »
KA7OEI has a good article on the use of consumer antenna splitters for ham/swl purposes.  I wasn’t aware of the problem with using “satellite only” splitters at lower frequencies.

http://ka7oei.blogspot.com/2019/12/using-tv-type-75-ohm-splitters-and-taps.html


242
This is fascinating to me.  This is a good transmitter fingerprinting tool.

Many years ago we would identify multiple carriers on a frequency by using Sub-Audible Heterodynes (SAH).  If two carriers were on the same frequency and differed by a small amount, your S-meter would show a small periodic oscillation up and down.  If it did this twice a minute, the two carriers differed by two hertz.  You had to factor out variations due to propagation and if there were multiple signals there it was hard to tell anything useful, but it worked somewhat.

You do exactly the same thing when calibrating your boat anchor frequency marker to WWV.   At some point you would no longer be able to hear an audible beat note and you would look at the S-meter for that point at which the small variations stopped.

Back in the seventies I would hear AM radio stations perform periodic frequency checks by broadcasting a tone and an independent lab some distance away would measure their transmit frequency.  It always amazed me that they could do this on graveyard channels where dozens of carriers were simultaneously present.  I don’t know how they did this, but I suspect that the audio tone they transmitted must have been accurate to less than a hertz.  The remote lab probably zero beat that tone on either the upper or lower sideband, measured the actually RF frequency of the tone, and by subtracting out the audio tone frequency would have the transmitted carrier frequency.  That’s my guess...if any of you station engineers can provide further insight I would be interested.  I don’t know how they accounted for frequency variations due to skywave effects.

243
SDR - Software Defined Radio / Re: New kiwiSDR Update
« on: December 26, 2019, 1247 UTC »
The narrow AM and narrow CW options are still there, though it took me a little while to find them.

Click on either the AM or CW button to select that mode.  Now click again on the same button to toggle between normal and narrow bandwidth.

244
General Radio Discussion / Re: Calibrated receive frequency
« on: December 21, 2019, 1548 UTC »
Once I went the SDR route, I gave up on using radio with knobs. Barbaric  :)

Knobs aren’t the issue.  Isn’t it really giving up on the use of radios without spectral displays?  Listening on a conventional radio feels like driving with blinders on.   I gotta know what is going on around me.

245
General Radio Discussion / Re: WQFG689 antenna
« on: December 20, 2019, 1258 UTC »
Is DX Toolbox for the iPad going to be updated for these features?

246
General Radio Discussion / FT8
« on: December 18, 2019, 1347 UTC »
A pet peeve of mine is when I hear someone claim FT8 operates with signals below the noise floor.  It works well, but there is no magic here.

https://tapr.org/pdf/DCC2018-KC5RUO-TheReal-FT8-JT65-JT9=SNR.pdf



247
The April 2016 issue of QST had an article by K1KP on his experiences with his solar panel installation, including what he did to control RFI.  There was some good advice in the article.

249
There is the nice Elad TMate 2.  It only costs three times the cost of a RSP1A.

251
I saw that.  There are a number of similar controls on Amazon for about $25.  I don’t know if they have the same board inside, so the code may require modification.

In the past people would modify an old mouse to provide this (I don’t think the current optical mouses will work).  The no-detent EC16 encoder is a bit of a challenge to find - most of what you see will have detents.

http://www.qsl.net/z33t/sdr_frequency_controller_eng.html

It is not clear to me what the advantage is of the modified USB volume control over the modified mouse.

252
My home power installation includes an automatic transfer switch for an outboard generator.  The electric company replaced the meter assembly with a new one that sticks out an additional 6 inches and added another metal box for control circuitry and the plug for the generator to connect to.  The 200 amp transfer relay is inside the new meter assembly.  It is noticeably bigger than the old one and is hard to miss.

If they replaced the meter assembly with one to support remote monitoring, it is conceivable they could have  included a 200 Amp relay in there.  The relay wouldn’t need to be physically larger than your main power breaker, but I would expect to see the whole meter assembly be a bit bigger than your old one.

253
General Radio Discussion / Russian EW
« on: December 08, 2019, 1350 UTC »

254
The fallacy about the 5G story is that it is probably not practical the way it is described.  The high data rates described require even higher amounts of eNB (the cell site xcvr) baseband connectivity.  The short range of the RF transmissions means you need many more eNB sites than 4G...again requiring more baseband connectivity.  The physical supporting infrastructure costs to fully provide 5G coverage are staggering.  Most industry people think that 5G will only be fielded to urban areas where the density of the population can make the investment worthwhile.  Suburban and rural locations will likely only get 4G coverage.  5G will be primarily for the cities.  Even the CEOs of wireless providers have implied this.

Verizon has been bragging about how they have wired a dozen or so football stadiums for 5G.  The trade publications say that they haven’t been able to provide full coverage, even at the football stadium level.

Keep in mind that the 5G spec includes multiple frequency bands and many data rates.   Not all 5G systems are equal.  Some 5G implementations are much less breathtaking than others.  T-Mobile is looking at using 600 MHz for their system - their data rates will be  lower than those  in the high GHz range - but their equipment won’t be on the bleeding edge.

255
General Radio Discussion / Re: FCC approves all digital AM
« on: November 28, 2019, 1351 UTC »
I spent a little time this week listening to WWFD while driving around.  I am in the lower Southern edge of WWFD’s fringe area according to this:

https://radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/pat?call=WWFD&service=AM&h=D

My receiver was the factory radio in my 2017 pickup.

First of all, I was surprised at how well it worked.  I expected dropouts (and there were plenty) but they were far fewer than I expected.  As is normal with digital radio, everything was either perfect, or non existent.  When the signal was there, sound quality was markedly better than the normal AM radio I listen to.  In fact it sounded much better than our local 22kW station.

Looking at the spectrum on my SDR at home, I realized that this is a much better “neighbor” than stations running the hybrid analog/digital mode.  WWFD’s entire carrier is contained +/- 5 kHz of their assigned frequency.  The analog stations have their digital carriers on the adjacent channels.  Granted, their digital carriers are 30 dB below their carrier power, but they do interfere with stations on those adjacent channels.

So I have mixed feelings about this.  As a DXer, I abhor this as the digital carrier effectively wipes out a channel.  You can’t hear anything through this.  Last night I saw three strong hybrid stations that effectively wiped out the channels above and below them - and that was with them running the digital signal at -30 dBc.  A digital carrier will lock up a channel for DXing purposes.  You can’t hear anything thru it.  It is a white noise jammer.

But as a consumer, I would listen to digital AM radio for local listening. The sound quality is significantly better.  And whatever range problems the current hybrid system has will get much better if they can up the digital power by 30 dB!  WWFD was “listenable” in my fringe area-I imagine it is very usable where Chris lives.

This could gain steam.

The bright side is that if you replaced a local hybrid station with a pure digital station, you will probably get the adjacent channels back for DXing.

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22