61
The RF Workbench / Re: Pushing a SHORT Antenna With Loading Coil
« on: July 24, 2024, 2052 UTC »
Hey Brian.
Thank you for the reply.
Re adding capacitance in “ parallel “ with the antenna: Since this antenna is only a single wire I can certainly see how I could wire a variable cap in series to it.
I am not sure how one would wire a var cap in parallel to a single wire antenna.
A var cap could, I suppose, be wired in parallel to the single winding loading
coil.Perhaps such an arrangement could / would influence the antenna itself.
But the antenna tank coil in the radio has a great deal of flexibility: it can have the var cap in series or parallel. It also has a wide range of taps for Z experimentation.
If, in a hypothetical, the load had a parallel wired var cap on it, it would seem to redundant to the functions that could be achieved in the radio’s antenna tank coil.
Since this is an occasional use endeavor it is preferable to keep the var cap count down to two- if all possible.
Re Slinky: I would like the actual 35 ft antenna run to be as thin and discrete as possible.The far end would be attached to the guy wire of a small telephone only wooden pole ( no power lines on pole) .It is NOT authorized and technically, NOT supposed to be there.
A Slinky would probably give a bit more of a visual profile than I would like.Also , one is much better off RF wise with the brass ( or even gold) plated Slinkys.Tough to find and a little deeper than I want to go.
Anyways, it’s really fun to bounce ideas around .
OT , my people are from Galway.
Again, I REALLY appreciate your looking at my post.
Thanks,
NQC
Thank you for the reply.
Re adding capacitance in “ parallel “ with the antenna: Since this antenna is only a single wire I can certainly see how I could wire a variable cap in series to it.
I am not sure how one would wire a var cap in parallel to a single wire antenna.
A var cap could, I suppose, be wired in parallel to the single winding loading
coil.Perhaps such an arrangement could / would influence the antenna itself.
But the antenna tank coil in the radio has a great deal of flexibility: it can have the var cap in series or parallel. It also has a wide range of taps for Z experimentation.
If, in a hypothetical, the load had a parallel wired var cap on it, it would seem to redundant to the functions that could be achieved in the radio’s antenna tank coil.
Since this is an occasional use endeavor it is preferable to keep the var cap count down to two- if all possible.
Re Slinky: I would like the actual 35 ft antenna run to be as thin and discrete as possible.The far end would be attached to the guy wire of a small telephone only wooden pole ( no power lines on pole) .It is NOT authorized and technically, NOT supposed to be there.
A Slinky would probably give a bit more of a visual profile than I would like.Also , one is much better off RF wise with the brass ( or even gold) plated Slinkys.Tough to find and a little deeper than I want to go.
Anyways, it’s really fun to bounce ideas around .
OT , my people are from Galway.
Again, I REALLY appreciate your looking at my post.
Thanks,
NQC