25
« on: July 22, 2010, 1702 UTC »
Friends, I cannot state more clearly the following sobering fact: Lex's new definition of "ultraphotomicrograph" is unquestionably in disagreement with his primitive commentaries. Please note that many of the conclusions I'm about to draw are based on cogent and virtually incontrovertible evidence provided by a set of people who have suffered immensely on account of Lex. Throughout history, there has been a clash between those who wish to lift the fog from his thinking and those who wish to contravene decency. Naturally, Lex belongs to the latter category. Make special note of that point because he contends that those of us who oppose him would rather run than fight. What planet is he from? The planet Haughty? Well, while you're deliberating over that, let me ask you another question: Is Man to be free to follow his conscience and worship as he sees fit, or must he accept a conscience and god provided to him by Lex? Now, not to bombard you with too many questions, but Lex claims that he has mystical powers of divination and prophecy. I respond that his chums are too indolent to question his authority.
One of Lex's squadristi once said, "You and I are objects for Lex to use then casually throw away and forget like old newsprint that's performed its duty catching bird droppings." Now that's pretty funny, of course, but I didn't include that quote just to make you laugh. I included it to convince you that Lex is careless with data, makes all sorts of causal interpretations of things without any real justification, has a way of combining disparate ideas that don't seem to hang together, seems to show a sort of pride in his own biases, gets into all sorts of viperine speculation, and then makes no effort to test out his speculations—and that's just the short list! He invariably supports politicians who have been groomed from childhood to turn us into easy prey for picayunish boors for a variety of reasons. For instance, when he hears anyone say that most of us avouch that he is extremely gruesome, his answer is to revive an arcadian past that never existed. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to allay the concerns of the many people who have been harmed by him.
Can you believe that Lex once said that a totalitarian dictatorship is the best form of government we could possibly have? I have a collection of similar pearls from Lex, but rather than recite them all I'll simply point out that Lex should stop calling me a footling parasite. Although I've been called worse things by better people, I've never bothered Lex. Yet Lex wants to interfere with a person's work performance, bodily security, physical movement, and privacy rights. Whatever happened to "live and let live"? In the beginning of this letter, I promised you details, but now I'm running out of space. So here's one detail to end with: Someone ought to ask Lex point-blank why he thinks he can impress us by talking about "unexceptionableness this" and "isomerizeparabolization that".