We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Author Topic: Solar Cycle 24 Nears Peak  (Read 806 times)

Offline ChrisSmolinski

  • Administrator
  • Marconi Class DXer
  • *****
  • Posts: 31291
  • Westminster, MD USA
    • View Profile
    • Black Cat Systems
Solar Cycle 24 Nears Peak
« on: July 29, 2013, 1347 UTC »
Notice that the peak of solar cycle 24, which we are currently in, is nowhere near the peak of solar cycle 23. Then, compare that to what was predicted. According to NASA, cycle 24 should of been at least as busy, if not busier than cycle 23.

So, the question is: with NASA's prediction that the peak of solar cycle 25 is even lower, do we believe it?

Was it so wrong about solar cycle 24 that we throw out the prediction? Or do we believe the trend that it will go down?

Another wild card is that some scientists are thinking this current solar cycle may see a secondary peak early in 2014. Notice, in the second graph above, the recent trend was that there was a second peak (cycle # 20, 21, 22 and 23) while cycles #18 and #19 did not. The thinking is that #18 and #19 were strong, while the others were not. The fact that this solar cycle is weak plays a role into the thinking that a second peak is possible.

http://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-blogs/astronomy/solar-cycle-24-nears-peak/15903420
Chris Smolinski
Westminster, MD
eQSLs appreciated! csmolinski@blackcatsystems.com
netSDR / AFE822x / AirSpy HF+ / KiwiSDR / 900 ft Horz skyloop / 500 ft NE beverage / 250 ft V Beam / 58 ft T2FD / 120 ft T2FD / 400 ft south beverage / 43m, 20m, 10m  dipoles / Crossed Parallel Loop / Discone in a tree

cmradio

  • Guest
Re: Solar Cycle 24 Nears Peak
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2013, 0654 UTC »
Quote
Was it so wrong about solar cycle 24 that we throw out the prediction?

No, it means the model is broken. The solution is to fix it by examining other relevant data :P
(Keppler for example is so busy looking at other planets around stars that NASA is ignoring the stars themselves. The question should be, "What do other G-type main-sequence stars tell us about our own sun?")

Peace!

 

HFUnderground T-Shirt
HFUnderground Garden Flag
by MitchellTimeDesigns