We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - redhat

Pages: 1 ... 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ... 106
1021
Sounds like box # 2 has a weak oscillator transistor, or something isn't right on the crystal loading side.

...Also something I wouldn't tackle without a scope.  I've been using one for so long, I can't imagine not having one.


Good luck grasshopper!

+-RH

1022
".... Thus the Locomotive of The Lord is able chug on 24/7."

A ministry beats the Hell out of a plain ol' church. You can't make any real money on just tithes and bake sales

You have such a way with words  ;D

+-RH

1023
General Radio Discussion / Re: Solar panels and RFI
« on: May 09, 2016, 1749 UTC »
Most likely you will only have switching trash during the day, as that's when the charge controller is doing its job.  Both PWM and MPPT type controllers use switching techniques to regulate charge current and usually are not well filtered.  At night, unless its an off grid system with AC output, things should be pretty quiet.

Good Luck!

+-RH

1024
Other / Re: 6914 Oddity RTTY 0105 UTC 6 May 2016
« on: May 06, 2016, 1805 UTC »
Perhaps because it begs the question "why AM?".  My money is on MARS as well.

+-RH

1025
Your also dealing with a company that has a lot of military and government contracts, they know where their breads' buttered.

...Just sayin'

+-RH

1026
This is unfortunate, I guess I'll have to cross 6875 off my op list too :(

+-RH

1027
I recall when WRMI first appeared on 6915, someone asked Jeff White why they chose 6915, and his answer was that is the frequency the FCC assigned them. Very strange.


Especially because the FCC does not assign SW licenses, the NTIA does.

Still about four years ago there was a station on 6885 that ran brokered programming.  I wonder why they decided to move?

+-RH

1028
General Radio Discussion / Re: Why 69xx kHz?
« on: May 04, 2016, 0715 UTC »
After some research, it looks like the actual range is 6770-7000. It seems like this band aligns with the "land mobile" band right under 40 meters. Are there any specific stations to watch out for here (other than 6903, 6913 and 6915)?

How about the "land mobile" designations above and below the 20 meter band (13.87-14MHz and 14.35-14.99MHz)? Is there anything to watch for there? Apparently the 20m band is the most popular during the day?

I plan on operating AM. What is the normal audio bandwidth for AM on shortwave. Is it the same as the broadcast band (10khz)? Can I use whatever I want? My transmitter can go up to 50khz, so I'm deciding where to filter the audio.

I know these may seem like obvious questions to some of you, but I am not a ham, and I'm new to shortwave. (I do have all the equipment (spectrum analyzer) to make sure I'm not putting out any harmonics or spurs, though.)

Thanks for all the help!

Under ITU rules, 4.5 KHz is considered 'standard' audio bandwidth (but there is no license to appease so who cares ;) ).  At the end of the day, most guys are listening with receivers that, SDR's withstanding, have limited audio bandwidth.  Wider audio also disperses transmitter power across a much large range of frequencies and will be perceived as 'more open' and 'less dense' than using narrower bandwidth audio, but there's no free lunch; coverage and listenability often suffers.  Wider receive bandwidth also lets more noise in, hampering reception of wide, weak signals.

In short, if your running DX and lots of power (over 250W carrier power) the North American NRSC-1 10 KHz modulation with pre-emphasis is a good way to go.  For lower powers, 3-5 KHz is usually best.  These are judgements made based on the airchecks I've received over the years from listeners, noting that most guys, even if wider bandwidth is available, will usually settle on 3-5 KHz.  So most of the time, that lovely twinkerbell percussion in your favourite disco number is most like going to be enjoyed only by yourself on your modulation monitor ;)  SDR's are changing this, and as they become more prevalent, I would guess more people will be enjoying better audio from our stations.

1029
General Radio Discussion / Re: Why 69xx kHz?
« on: May 03, 2016, 0519 UTC »
It depends of who you ask, but the general consensus (in my view anyway) is that it provides a good balance of day and night propagation, particularly at shorter distances.  This allows ops to reach audiences close by during daylight hours via NVIS propagation, and longer distances at night via skywave.  It also has the added benefit of being close enough to the 40 meter ham band to allow commercially produced equipment to be used there.  Although antennas for this area are larger than those used at higher frequencies, propagation via NVIS during daylight hours is more reliable than the higher frequencies.  Higher frequencies also pose difficulties at night for DX, as just about anywhere on the continent would be in the skip zone, and very good propagation conditions are required to reach distant audiences at the power level most pirates have at their disposal.

In all fairness, there have been a few ops running just under the 20 meter ham bands, but usually during daylight hours, which is risky in my judgement.

Location plays into this alot as well.  East coasters rely on NVIS to reach close in targets, and a dipole or inverted V are good antennas for this application.

As always, YMMV...

+-RH

1030
General Radio Discussion / Re: Server Updates
« on: April 28, 2016, 2237 UTC »
Thank You for your hard work, Sir!

+-RH

1031
General Radio Discussion / Re: The Russian Woodpecker
« on: April 27, 2016, 1347 UTC »
The taper looks like it may be used for matching impedance and the large diameter should contribute to increasing bandwidth. Hope someone more knowledgeable can comment.

That's the jist of it.

+-RH

1032
General Radio Discussion / Re: Signal on 6947.45 or so
« on: April 21, 2016, 1605 UTC »
Yup that UTE has been there on and off for the last several years, destroying what used to be a good AM frequency of 6950KHz.

+-RH

1033
General Radio Discussion / Re: Signal on 6947.45 or so
« on: April 20, 2016, 1411 UTC »
Is it not the UTE that likes to hang out there, usually in slow speed FSK?

+-RH

1034
QSLs Received / Re: United States Coast Guard - QSL
« on: April 15, 2016, 1733 UTC »
Quote
Confirm with QSL in 202 days!

A new record for government efficiency!

+-RH

1035
That works for me, Thanks :)

+-RH

Pages: 1 ... 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 [69] 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 ... 106