We seek to understand and document all radio transmissions, legal and otherwise, as part of the radio listening hobby. We do not encourage any radio operations contrary to regulations. Always consult with the appropriate authorities if you have questions concerning what is permissible in your locale.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - redhat

Pages: 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 [70] 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 ... 106
1036
Any chance you could add sunspot info somewhere too?

Thank You for all the hard work around here!

+-RH

1037
Yup, and the ENG crew went out and searched for hours looking for the only three people in Chicago that were offended by it.  LOL

With the increasing tendency for stations to link to their transmitters over IP, due largely to the scarcity of microwave spectrum in most markets (large and small believe it or not) they have left the door open for intrusion.  At least in the old days you had to build gear, now you can sit at home with some clever software (and probably some inside knowledge about the target station) and cause chaos.

It is a new age.  I will be over here, under my rock :)

+-RH

1038
General Radio Discussion / Re: Dropbox
« on: April 08, 2016, 0533 UTC »
For the record, Google drive has many of the same features, and is included with any gmail address.  I've been using it lately to send large files and works well.

+-RH

1039
Equipment / Re: RE:Sony ICF 2010 MIB on ebay goes for big bucks
« on: April 05, 2016, 0413 UTC »
Don't forget, the 2010 used an AM stereo decoder IC as part of its sync detector and can easily be modified to receive c-quam transmissions  ;)

+-RH

1040
Wind perhaps?  Any off-grid system is going to need batteries, and they don't usually like it that cold.  Any flowing hydro nearby?

+-RH

1041
Ah yes, the days when radio still needed 'heavy metal'  ;D

+-RH

1042
General Radio Discussion / Re: Sick R71A
« on: March 13, 2016, 1741 UTC »
ASIC's aren't that hard to find.  You'd be surprised what you can find on ebay.  C-QUAM IC's have been out of production for close to 20 years, but they are still on ebay :)

There is also the notion of picking up a second unit as a 'parts kitten'.

+-RH

1043
General Radio Discussion / SWPC appears to be down
« on: March 12, 2016, 1118 UTC »
I noticed the Ionograms on the propagation page didn't work, and none of the others on the web seem to work either.

I wonder what our tax dollars broke this time?

http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/

+-RH

1044
Equipment / Re: Yaesu FT-1000D Receiver failure...
« on: March 06, 2016, 0540 UTC »
If the receiver has a mechanical transmit/receive relay the contacts may have oxidize or got dirt in them.  Sometimes soldering flux from manufacturing will absorb moisture and cause all sorts of problems.  Sony had a problem with this in the early 2000's when the world went to water wash flux.

There could be a protection diode in the front end that shorted, or a bad pin switching diode.  Sometimes preamps go out too.

The FT857/897 had a problem where the glue/potting material on the IF filters would become conductive and short out the IF path.  Check there too.

Without a spectrum analyzer and a signal generator its going to be hard to find.  You may be able to extract some 455KHz IF from an AM tuner and inject it into the IF path and see if you can find where it loses the signal.

+-RH

1045
The RF Workbench / Re: RF lowpass filters and inductor orientation
« on: February 27, 2016, 2002 UTC »
The basic idea is to wind all the inductors the same direction, but reverse the input and output on every other pole.  So in essence, the magnetic flux is flowing in the reverse direction than it would be for the normal orientation.  This is accomplished by merely connecting the starting point of the wound toroid to the output of the pole rather than its input.

1046
The RF Workbench / Re: RF lowpass filters and inductor orientation
« on: February 26, 2016, 0751 UTC »
A little of both.  I'll try and post a pic or two when I get some time.

1047
The RF Workbench / Re: RF lowpass filters and inductor orientation
« on: February 26, 2016, 0114 UTC »
Smaller sized cores unfortunately could not handle the power excursions that these filters will have to reliably endure.  This is further complicated by the relatively low inductance values which when coupled with higher mu core types leads to higher losses through core saturation.  The only real way to reduce coupling is to play games with inductor phasing, spacing, or throw in the towel and go with air inductors.

+-RH

1048
The RF Workbench / Re: RF lowpass filters and inductor orientation
« on: February 21, 2016, 2144 UTC »
No, insertion loss would remain at the same ratio regardless of power level.

1049
The RF Workbench / RF lowpass filters and inductor orientation
« on: February 21, 2016, 2002 UTC »
I've been playing with filter design lately in the process of making PCB's for a few prototype transmitters and the old debate is raging.  This is what I found.

Among hams there is a notion that toroids are self-shielding, that is the magnetic flux of the winding is contained to within the core and thus very little outside influence can be expected.  With air-wound inductors, this is not true, and every pole in a filter is usually designed and build with adjacent coils at right angles to each other.

This lack of interaction in toroids is somewhat true I found, but measurable interaction does occur.

I built a 7 element MW lowpass filter of shunt type Chebyshev design with 0.1dB ripple and a cutoff frequency of 1.9 MHz.  In this design, all inductors were built  broadside to each other to save space, cores were T200-2 spaced about 0.6"

Anticipated rejection (Fc = 1720 KHz)
Fc -0.5dB
2Fc -50dB
3Fc -76dB

Measured rejection
Fc -1.9dB
2Fc -51dB
3Fc -77dB

I then changed the winding direction of the middle inductor and measured again.

Measured rejection
Fc -0.26
2Fc -51
3Fc -76

I found it interesting that the rejection of the harmonics was little affected, but reversing the winding direction had a large effect on the passband loss.  With the inductors wound the same way,  passband power loss was around 35%, meaning 100W in, 65W out!  With the inductor wound the other way, losses were reduced to just 6%.

All measurements were done with a HP signal generator and spectrum analyzer.  First, reference measurements were made with the generator set at 10dBm on each frequency, then the filter measured, and the loss calculated.

+-RH

1050
Huh? / Re: Floppy Disks
« on: February 21, 2016, 1934 UTC »
 ;D

In the early days, I like to use 5-1/4" floppies to save qbasic programs.  I just like the sound of the drives doing their thing!

+-RH

Pages: 1 ... 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 [70] 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 ... 106